Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Hardware > Pro Tools | MTRX & MTRX Studio
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-29-2023, 01:23 PM
Picture Start Picture Start is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: featureland
Posts: 252
Default MTRX Studio I/O Setup is Confusing

Can anyone else tell me or post a screenshot to their I/O Setup when using a MTRX Studio? I find the fact that you have two mic inputs as 1-2 and two TRS monitor outputs as 1-2 breaks up the usual way of thinking about I/O, which we've all trained ourselves to do, which is in groups of 8/16/24.

Is the move to make an I/O Setup where you ignore the hard channels numbers and just number them how you want to see them? for example:

INPUTS:

TB Mic 1
INST 2
LINE 1-2
LINE 3-4
LINE 5-6
LINE 7-8
LINE 9-10
LINE 11-12
LINE 13-14
LINE 15-16
DIG 1-2
DIG 3-4
DIG 5-6
DIG 7-8
DIG 9-10
DIG 11-12
DIG 13-14

Last edited by Picture Start; 12-29-2023 at 01:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-29-2023, 02:23 PM
Picture Start Picture Start is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: featureland
Posts: 252
Default Re: MTRX Studio I/O Setup is Confusing

Maybe something like this?



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-29-2023, 02:41 PM
BScout BScout is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,197
Default Re: MTRX Studio I/O Setup is Confusing

You can map any physical channel to any place in DADman.
The digilink ins and outs seen in Pro Tools are independently configurable inside DADman to the physical actual connections.

If you want the mic pres and monitor outs in a different location, you can. So you can keep your sets of 8. It is not a "fixed" set up -- it's up to the user.

(also, you should have 64 channels not 32 unless for some reason you aren't using both digilink ports on your HDX card and your MTRX Studio.)
__________________
Pro Tools Ult 2024.3.1, HDX 2, MTRX/SPQ, RME BBF Pro + MADIface ProS1 x 2, Fire Max11 x 2, Dock, iPad Air5 Mac Mini 14,12, 12 core, macOS 13.6.6RAM 32GB, SSD 4TB, GPU 19 coreQNAP TVS-872XT 148TB TB3
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-29-2023, 02:58 PM
creativecontrol's Avatar
creativecontrol creativecontrol is offline
Avid
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,255
Default Re: MTRX Studio I/O Setup is Confusing

Indeed, the double edged sword that is MTRX + Pro Tools is -> anything is possible! So, documentation is critical.

Figure out how you want to allocate and organize patches and monitors in DADman, then in Pro Tools, create the appropriate IO Setup and save templates, PIOs and everything else that will help you avoid reinventing the wheel.

best,


Jeff
__________________
Jeff Komar
Solutions
S6 FAQ
MTRX FAQ
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-29-2023, 03:03 PM
Picture Start Picture Start is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: featureland
Posts: 252
Default Re: MTRX Studio I/O Setup is Confusing

Quote:
Originally Posted by BScout View Post
You can map any physical channel to any place in DADman.
The digilink ins and outs seen in Pro Tools are independently configurable inside DADman to the physical actual connections.

If you want the mic pres and monitor outs in a different location, you can. So you can keep your sets of 8. It is not a "fixed" set up -- it's up to the user.

(also, you should have 64 channels not 32 unless for some reason you aren't using both digilink ports on your HDX card and your MTRX Studio.)
Correct, I'm only with one digilink for the moment. These things were always included, but Avid got cheap along the way. And I bought two of these things, so I need to buy 3 digilinks, aargh.

Yes, I think I'm finding the patchability will allow me to make I/O look how I want. Like everything in DADMan, you have to come around to ITS way of thinking. But already possibilities are revealing themselves.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-29-2023, 03:09 PM
Picture Start Picture Start is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: featureland
Posts: 252
Default Re: MTRX Studio I/O Setup is Confusing

Quote:
Originally Posted by creativecontrol View Post
Indeed, the double edged sword that is MTRX + Pro Tools is -> anything is possible! So, documentation is critical.

Figure out how you want to allocate and organize patches and monitors in DADman, then in Pro Tools, create the appropriate IO Setup and save templates, PIOs and everything else that will help you avoid reinventing the wheel.

best,


Jeff
Yes, that seems to be the best order of operations: DADman > Pro Tools. I'm getting there, little by little.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-30-2023, 01:22 AM
LDS LDS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,502
Default Re: MTRX Studio I/O Setup is Confusing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Picture Start View Post
Yes, that seems to be the best order of operations: DADman > Pro Tools. I'm getting there, little by little.

The DAD/MTRX stuff is quite divergent from the previous decades of integrated Avid interfaces where the I/O page directly reflected the physical inputs and outputs on the digilink interfaces, but it is very flexible & powerful stuff. For DAD/MTRX stuff, I always found it helpful to compartmentalise the various I/O routing pages.

- The Pro Tools I/O menu only handles the routing of the digilink ports directly on your HD native or HDX card.

- DADman handles the I/O routing of all the physical inputs and outputs on your MTRX Studio, including its digilink ports.

In so many way, DADman becomes the epicentre of everything happening in your studio. It handles the talkback. It handles the monitoring. It handles the routing of analogue and digital I/O. The Pro Tools I/O page becomes something much simpler, as it is just there to send digilink audio between Pro Tools and DADman.
__________________
Pro Tools Ultimate 2024.3. OSX 13.6.5. Win 10. HD Native. Lynx AES16e. Lynx Aurora 16. i9-13900KF. ASRock Z690 Steel Legend. 64GB Ram. AMD Vega 64. BM Decklink. Dolby Atmos Renderer 5.2. Trinnov D-Mon. D-Command.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-30-2023, 02:31 AM
uptheoctave uptheoctave is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 719
Default Re: MTRX Studio I/O Setup is Confusing

Quote:
Originally Posted by LDS View Post
The DAD/MTRX stuff is quite divergent from the previous decades of integrated Avid interfaces where the I/O page directly reflected the physical inputs and outputs on the digilink interfaces, but it is very flexible & powerful stuff. For DAD/MTRX stuff, I always found it helpful to compartmentalise the various I/O routing pages.

- The Pro Tools I/O menu only handles the routing of the digilink ports directly on your HD native or HDX card.

- DADman handles the I/O routing of all the physical inputs and outputs on your MTRX Studio, including its digilink ports.

In so many way, DADman becomes the epicentre of everything happening in your studio. It handles the talkback. It handles the monitoring. It handles the routing of analogue and digital I/O. The Pro Tools I/O page becomes something much simpler, as it is just there to send digilink audio between Pro Tools and DADman.
Yep, this is how I do it too.
__________________
James Richmond
https://www.jamesrichmond.com

2019 Mac Pro, 2022 Mac Studio Ultra
Avid S6, HDX2, MTRX II, MTRX, DAD AX64, AX32, Focusrite Rednet PCIER, Trinnov MC8 Pro.
Studio: https://www.voltperoctave.com | Music: https://www.euclideancircuits.com
Latest Article: Auto-Bounce for Logic Pro

Affiliate Links:
Auto-Bounce by Tom Salta
Dreamhost Web Hosting
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-30-2023, 11:18 AM
Picture Start Picture Start is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: featureland
Posts: 252
Default Re: MTRX Studio I/O Setup is Confusing

Quote:
Originally Posted by LDS View Post
The DAD/MTRX stuff is quite divergent from the previous decades of integrated Avid interfaces where the I/O page directly reflected the physical inputs and outputs on the digilink interfaces, but it is very flexible & powerful stuff. For DAD/MTRX stuff, I always found it helpful to compartmentalise the various I/O routing pages.

- The Pro Tools I/O menu only handles the routing of the digilink ports directly on your HD native or HDX card.

- DADman handles the I/O routing of all the physical inputs and outputs on your MTRX Studio, including its digilink ports.

In so many way, DADman becomes the epicentre of everything happening in your studio. It handles the talkback. It handles the monitoring. It handles the routing of analogue and digital I/O. The Pro Tools I/O page becomes something much simpler, as it is just there to send digilink audio between Pro Tools and DADman.
I appreciate this framing. It makes it easy to understand the mindset behind it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-30-2023, 11:32 AM
nsureit nsureit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 216
Default Re: MTRX Studio I/O Setup is Confusing

I have connected both Digilink cables from MTRX Studio to HDX card = 32 hardware device I/Os. Most are outboard preamps, plus several compressors.













Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dual MTRX Studio setup Goombot Pro Tools | MTRX & MTRX Studio 12 04-28-2023 01:20 PM
MTRX Studio with Hd Native and HD I/O 16x16 Analogue. Anyone with this setup? baslotto Pro Tools | MTRX & MTRX Studio 1 01-24-2023 01:44 AM
Dante Virtual Soundcard - MTRX Studio Setup TrentWilliams Pro Tools | MTRX & MTRX Studio 10 07-22-2021 06:52 PM
MTRX Studio Audio Midi Setup Goombot Pro Tools 2020 6 02-25-2021 08:35 AM
Advice on MTRX Studio setup please Cheesehead Pro Tools | MTRX & MTRX Studio 9 09-03-2020 03:01 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:06 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com