|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Waves APA32 Report
There's no more latency than there is using the plugs without the APA.
I tend to use it only for verbs in auxes, so I don't have to deal with latency issues.
__________________
Pro Tools 10.3.3 | HD Native | HD I/O 8x8x8 | Mac Pro 8 Core Westmere | 24GB RAM | OSX Lion 10.7.4 | API 3124 | Chandler TG-2 | UA 4-710d | Empirical Labs Distressor EL8X | Kemper Rack | |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Waves APA32 Report
Quote:
I wonder how it will run with the UAD card installed too.
__________________
Docta'J Download free music at http://www.nukmusic.com nEVER uNDERESTIMATE kNOWLEDGE |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Waves APA32 Report
Well, if you already have Waves plugs the unit certainly makes sense, and getting the IR-L and QClone with it make it seem pretty affordable from my view.
__________________
Pro Tools 10.3.3 | HD Native | HD I/O 8x8x8 | Mac Pro 8 Core Westmere | 24GB RAM | OSX Lion 10.7.4 | API 3124 | Chandler TG-2 | UA 4-710d | Empirical Labs Distressor EL8X | Kemper Rack | |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Waves APA32 Report
I agree with EJ on this with one addition, you'd need to be a waves diamond bundle user to get the most benefit, check what plugs are available for the APA and whether you use them often enough to warrant the purchase. For me the Q-clone is really worth having, its even better that it isn't sucking cycles out of my CPU. I haven't had any latency issues during a mix and haven't attempted to use the unit during tracking.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Waves APA32 Report
another quick question...
I read that automation isn't supported in vst netshell. total bummer can you use automation in the rtas versions? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Waves APA32 Report
Hi guys, Im impressed by the q-clone, its perfect for preserving 'out of the box' mixes.
Id love them to make a 'comp-clone' one which emulates any outboard compressor cheers |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Waves APA32 Report
I use a Control/24 with 002. Since this is ethernet based would the APA and Control/24 create any probs?
Shane
__________________
Pro Tools Power User Editing Give your plug-ins a facelift...and skin 'em! __________________ "Music should be performed by the musician, not by the engineer." Michael Wagener 25th July 2005, 02:59 PM __________________ Pro Tools|HD Native 9.0.1 | Pro Tools|HDX 10.2 | Studio One | REAPER 4.22 | HD OMNI | HoboMac Pro 2.26Ghz Quad-Core | W7 Ultimate 64-bit |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Waves APA32 Report
Quote:
hth |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Waves APA32 Report
Quote:
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Waves APA32 Report
Hope you don't mind me jumping on your thread EJ...
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Waves APA32 experiences | crizdee | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 2 | 11-29-2007 06:09 AM |
Waves APA32 vs UAD-1 | artvolk | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 6 | 08-10-2005 03:15 PM |
Waves APA32 Plug In Accelerator | dodo | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 1 | 07-02-2005 05:49 PM |
Waves 4.0 performance report | basschair | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 2 | 02-13-2003 12:05 AM |
Bug report Waves Supertap | Ben Jenssen | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 03-13-2002 09:53 AM |