|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why is Pro Tools so unstable? Why is support so bad? Update Sandra report added
I have an 003 and Eleven rack. I have a dell xps dual core running Win 7 Ultimate 32 and find pro tools to be a very unstable program. Whenever I restart my system I see the blue screen of death 5 or 6 times before pro tools finally loads. I have submitted 3 support requests and the answer is always bad drivers reinstall. That is [bleep][bleep][bleep][bleep][bleep][bleep][bleep][bleep], I have reinstalled 7 times now and nothing changes. I do not understand why the software engineers at Avid are so incompetent that they cannot fix this. Features and User Interface are nice but system stability across ALL possible platforms and interfaces (USB, Firewire 400 or 800 etc.) is the base of a well written product. Pro Tools is not a well written product and Avid should be ashamed of the garbage they sell. THEY NEED TO MAKE THEIR PRODUCT STABLE. Please Avid listen because right now your software sucks.
Last edited by Robert Todd; 02-09-2011 at 09:29 AM. Reason: update title |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is Pro Tools so unstable? Why is support so bad?
Hmmm....I've been making a living with Pro Tools since version 5.3, and am likely not alone with the sentiment that if it was UNSTABLE I'd be using something else. It is VERY resource intensive, and very specific concerning its requirement in a host computer. I'd be interested to see a Sandra report on your system to see if it's compatible. One out-of-place component can create a very unstable system.
That being said, I'm teaching audio recording on two different programs at the local community college, and the "runs on anything" program that people learn BEFORE my Pro Tools class is a clunky amateurish piece of junk in my humble opinion. Stability across ALL platforms and interfaces is not always realistic because of the huge amount of data that's being sent around inside the box....there's typically one well-researched, proven configuration. So...if you're truly SOLUTION-oriented, theres LOTS of people on here willing to help sort this out. Start with that Sandra report and let's see what we're dealing with. Might be something really simple. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why is Pro Tools so unstable? Why is support so bad?
Can you post us a Sandra report so we can check out your system? "Off the shelf" Dell's are known to be problematic with PT at times.
You also need to do the standard system optimizations. Shane
__________________
Pro Tools Power User Editing Give your plug-ins a facelift...and skin 'em! __________________ "Music should be performed by the musician, not by the engineer." Michael Wagener 25th July 2005, 02:59 PM __________________ Pro Tools|HD Native 9.0.1 | Pro Tools|HDX 10.2 | Studio One | REAPER 4.22 | HD OMNI | HoboMac Pro 2.26Ghz Quad-Core | W7 Ultimate 64-bit |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why is Pro Tools so unstable? Why is support so bad?
Robert, I can only mimic the answers above. You have been around here for a while and must know that Pro Tools is a very special application, and it requires a special host computer and peripherals. Not only the choice of hardware and drivers, but also other installed applications must be considered. As requested in the "Help Us Help You" sticky, post a Sandra report and we'll go from there.
__________________
~ tom thomas Formerly hobotom Pro Tools Ultimate 2024 HDX Hybrid HD Omni and 192 I/Os Windows 10 Intel Hexcore i7 All Samsung Pro SSDs Ampex MM1200 2" 24 trk tape Outboard: UREI, Eventide, Lexicon, Yamaha, TC Electronics, Orban, ART, EchoAudio, Dolby, Hughes, API, Neve, Audio Arts, BBE, Aphex, Berringer, MOTU, dbx, Allison, etc. Plug-ins: Too many to talk about. www.metrostudios.com |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why is Pro Tools so unstable? Why is support so bad?
Quote:
There wasn't a response from you to either case. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is Pro Tools so unstable? Why is support so bad?
Quote:
There wasn't a response on the first because of being away from my studio and you closed the case. All responses after that, when I returned home, were ignored. The second case I repeated the exact same thing you sent in the 1st case, which both times was to reinstall everything, a time consuming task. That said, both times for a short while, the problems disappeared, only to reappear yesterday after I installed an external HD per the hardware specifications page here. I have now ignored the support request, knowing the answer in advance and reinstalled everything again, and yes the system now starts up smoothly except, Pro tools sees the 003 when the 11R is turned off, but, sees only the 11R when it is turned on, not both as it did before. I apologize for the rant, but prior to retiring I was a software engineer writing in C, C++ and Java and writing applications thast hbandled much higher data flows than music files do, and the only times I ever saw such instability in application performance was in C languages when the programmer either failed to close the memory allocations they had opened when they were through with them, known as a memory leak, or when the programmer directed the application attempts to access memory or interupts used by other system resources. Both are absolutely preventable (Java does it for you) by having the application check availability of these resources prior to attempting to access them, or in the case of memory leaks (again Java does this without any coding by the programmer) carefully tracking where memory is allocated with the malloc(X) command where X is the name of the variable and freeing it programaticaly immediately after it is used with the free(X) command. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is Pro Tools so unstable? Why is support so bad?
Sandra report below
SiSoftware Sandra Computer Model : Dell Dell DXP061 Workgroup : WORKGROUP Host Name : Windows-PC User : Robert Todd Processor Model : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6700 @ 2.66GHz Speed : 2.66GHz Cores per Processor : 2 Unit(s) Threads per Core : 1 Unit(s) Type : Dual-Core Integrated Data Cache : 2x 32kB, Synchronous, Write-Thru, 8-way, 64 byte line size L2 On-board Cache : 4MB, ECC, Synchronous, ATC, 16-way, 64 byte line size, 2 threads sharing Computer Mainboard : Dell 0CT017 BIOS : Dell 2.5.0 05/24/2007 Bus(es) : X-Bus PCI PCIe IMB USB FireWire/1394 i2c/SMBus Multi-Processor (MP) Support : No Multi-Processor Advanced PIC (APIC) : Yes Total Memory : 2GB DIMM DDR Chipset Model : Dell P965/G965 Memory Controller Hub Front Side Bus Speed : 4x 266MHz (1GHz) Total Memory : 2GB DIMM DDR Memory Bus Speed : 800MHz Memory Module(s) Memory Module : Hynix (Hyundai) HYMP512U64BP8-S5 1GB DIMM DDR2 PC2-6400U DDR2-800 (5-5-5-18 3-23-6-3) Memory Module : Hynix (Hyundai) HYMP512U64BP8-S5 1GB DIMM DDR2 PC2-6400U DDR2-800 (5-5-5-18 3-23-6-3) Video System Video Adapter : NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS (32 SM4.0 1.35GHz, 256MB DDR3 2GHz 128-bit, PCIe 1.00 x16) Video Adapter : NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS (32 SM4.0 1.35GHz, 256MB DDR3 2GHz 128-bit, PCIe 1.00 x16) Graphics Processor OpenCL Processor : NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS (32SP 4C 1.45GHz, 256MB DDR3 2GHz 128-bit) Compute Shader Processor : NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS (32SP 1.35GHz, 256MB DDR3 2GHz 128-bit) Storage Devices Seagate ST3250820AS (250GB, SATA300, 3.5", 8MB Cache) : 233GB (C:) OWC Mercury Elite-AL 2TB (USB) : 2TB (F:) PBDS CD-RW/DVD-ROM DH-48C2S (SATA150, DVD+-R, CD-RW, 2MB Cache) : N/A (D:) PBDS DVD+/-RW DH-16W1S (SATA150, DVD+-RW, CD-RW, 2MB Cache) : N/A (E:) Logical Storage Devices Reservado para el sistema : 100MB (NTFS) New Volume (F:) : 2TB (NTFS) @ OWC Mercury Elite-AL 2TB (USB) Hard Disk (C:) : 233GB (NTFS) @ Seagate ST3250820AS (250GB, SATA300, 3.5", 8MB Cache) Optical Drive (D:) : N/A @ PBDS CD-RW/DVD-ROM DH-48C2S (SATA150, DVD+-R, CD-RW, 2MB Cache) Optical Drive (E:) : N/A @ PBDS DVD+/-RW DH-16W1S (SATA150, DVD+-RW, CD-RW, 2MB Cache) Peripherals LPC Hub Controller 1 : Intel 82801HH (ICH8DH) LPC Interface Controller LPC Legacy Controller 1 : SMSC SCH5514D-NS Audio Device : Dell 82801H (ICH8) HD Audio Controller Audio Device : Creative Labs Audigy Audio Processor Serial Port(s) : 1 Disk Controller : Dell ICH8R (ICH8) SATA RAID Controller USB Controller 1 : Dell 82801H (ICH8) USB UHCI #4 USB Controller 2 : Dell 82801H (ICH8) USB UHCI #5 USB Controller 3 : Dell 82801H (ICH8) USB2 EHCI #2 USB Controller 4 : Dell 82801H (ICH8) USB UHCI #1 USB Controller 5 : Dell 82801H (ICH8) USB UHCI #2 USB Controller 6 : Dell 82801H (ICH8) USB UHCI #3 USB Controller 7 : Dell 82801H (ICH8) USB2 EHCI #1 FireWire/1394 Controller 1 : ADS Technologies TSB43AB23 1394a-2000 OHCI PHY/link-layer Controller SMBus/i2c Controller 1 : Intel ICH SMBus Printers and Faxes Printer : Send To Microsoft OneNote 2010 Driver (1200x1200, Colour) Printer : Microsoft XPS Document Writer (600x600, Colour) Fax : Microsoft Shared Fax Driver (200x200) Printer : Dell Laser Printer 1720dn (1200x1200) Network Services Network Adapter : Intel(R) 82566DC Gigabit Network Connection (Ethernet, 100Mbps) Power Management Mains (AC) Line Status : On-Line Operating System Windows System : Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate 6.01.7600 Platform Compliance : x86 Windows Experience Index Current System : 5.5 |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why is Pro Tools so unstable? Why is support so bad?
Quote:
Case 2 on 1/26: "Digi 003 and Eleven Rack used together crash system" (We responded within a day asking you for computer information, and provided driver info again as well as a DigiDelivery link for the 8.0.4 installer. There are no responses from you on this case.) So we tried to help, but instead of responding to us you started a thread calling our programmers incompetent, our products garbage, and our support bad. You are entitled to your opinion, but our products work for the vast majority and we are honestly trying to help you figure out why they aren't working properly for you. So back to that... Please try holding the N key when you see the splash screen during launch. Do you see options for 003 and Eleven Rack? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is Pro Tools so unstable? Why is support so bad? Update Sandra report added
FireWire/1394 Controller 1 : ADS Technologies TSB43AB23 1394a-2000 OHCI PHY/link-layer Controller
From my experience with 2 Dell Laptops I own, (although different firewire chipsets) that they are not stable using the onboard firewire controller. I have had sessions crash 20 min into a live recording, and during the same show, it froze but appeared to continue recording. At the end of the night 2 of 3 sets got less than 20 min of usable material, and 1 set was completely unusable. I purchased a TI chipset PCIe adapter card (for my laptop expansion card) and have not had a problem since then. Just a thought. I have had problems with onboard firewire controllers even just getting my 2626 recognized let alone stable. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is Pro Tools so unstable? Why is support so bad? Update Sandra report added
Hi,
I have exactly the same problem. Playing live, either the system crashes, either suddenly a very bad noise occurs. Thanks for your help. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
No sound in pro tools (have sandra report and all info in thread) | Scruffy1012 | Getting Started | 4 | 04-10-2013 12:00 AM |
Laptop Compatibility for Pro Tools SANDRA REPORT INCLUDED | Richard621 | Windows | 4 | 04-01-2013 10:07 PM |
Is this cpu compatible with Pro Tools 9 ? Sandra Report included | bobbybland | Windows | 9 | 09-04-2011 10:32 AM |
Digi support here is my sandra report- please advise | Fullsound Recording | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Win) | 7 | 01-03-2010 08:16 PM |
Sandra report - for Support | bmcoonan | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 1 | 01-22-2009 07:58 AM |