S6 v.2.3 feature wishlist

[creativecontrol]

Perhaps the track you are looking at has another dynamics plug-in upstream? Try sticking a Pro Compressor by itself on a track and Attention it.

Also - make sure your version of ProCompressor is at least 12.1 or higher.


Jeff

Originally Posted by rcutz

Jeff, what is going wrong with mine? It doesn't make sense right?
I'm on mac os 10.10.5, s6 3.5 and 12.6 and plugins are uptodate.
I will do a video today and send it as message to you.
Best

Ps: I'm on M10.

[bergj00]

Originally Posted by creativecontrol

Yes, I was just playing with Spill as well. We definitely need to get a workflow implemented so you can quickly leverage this on S6 Fader modules.


Jeff

Jeff - I wish pro tools had this feature built in natively into the software. It would be great if we could adjust levels of each multi-channel "stem" per clip. This could be similar to the new 12.6 clip based processing or spilling a master on the S5.

Josh

[EddieJones]

Have you seen this https://neyrinck.com/products/spill/ once plugin knobs to faders are done it could be very useful.

[innenhofstudios]

Originally Posted by EddieJones

Have you seen this https://neyrinck.com/products/spill/ once plugin knobs to faders are done it could be very useful.

The idea or "wish" was to implement a Clip Effect like Spill i guess...

[rcutz]

Originally Posted by creativecontrol

Perhaps the track you are looking at has another dynamics plug-in upstream? Try sticking a Pro Compressor by itself on a track and Attention it.

Also - make sure your version of ProCompressor is at least 12.1 or higher.


Jeff

Jeff, updated pro compressor, the gain curve shows up.
Thanks
Best.
(Sorry for hijacking the thread)

[bergj00]

Originally Posted by innenhofstudios

The idea or "wish" was to implement a Clip Effect like Spill i guess...

Exactly. This should be integral to PT. no need for extra plug in to do it. The trim plug in can do this but it's super clunky.

[EddieJones]

Controlling Clip FX from the surface is definitely on our list.

[bergj00]

Cool. Thanks Eddie. Would be very cool to see avid do something similar to the neyrink offering natively in pro tools. Seems like a pretty easy thing to do, right?

[rcutz]

I receive this email from developer today:
"Sorry, this one I do not understand. Is he saying that Tight/Diffuse and "Out" are missing in the controller when he adds the plug-in? If so, then what is this talk about "expand”?
I complained about some parameters missing in the console when his pluggin was expanded. I guess this guy even researched about S6, or maybe my english was pretty bad ( i guess both).

So my request is:

- apple like strict guidelines and control of third partie plug-ins mapping implementantion for S6.

I miss a lot when plug-ins don`t map properly. When I can`t have any kind of visual feedback from MTM from plug-ins that aren`t Avid. I understand that it would be a huge work, but it is necessary right now in my humble opnion.

best.

[EddieJones]

Originally Posted by rcutz

- apple like strict guidelines and control of third partie plug-ins mapping implementantion for S6.

We do have guidelines in the API on how things should map but it would be very hard for us to enforce it.