|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
quick antares auto tune 4 question
When I am installing antares auto tune 4, should I install the direct x installer or the RTAS installer or both? I am running pro tools m-powered 7.0 with an m audio firewire 1814 on my laptop. Thanks,
Seth |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: quick antares auto tune 4 question
RTAS, unless you have another app, that hosts Direct-X.
good luck,
__________________
cheers, Andrew W7 pro 64_i7 3930K_16GB_ Nuendo 6.5.4-7.1.3 / PT 12.4 ------Mac Mini OSX Lion_PT 10.xx Allen&Heath GS R-24M_ full rack of vintage analog boxes _UAD2_Nugen_iZotope_Melda_Waves_Plugin Alliance_DMG and more 2.0 and 5.1 monitoring |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: quick antares auto tune 4 question
When doing vocals, should I run the vocal track through antares auto tune first before adding any effects such as reverb, eq, compression, etc. How do you guts do it to get a good vocal sound. Also, I am currently recording a terrible singer and have to try my best to fix his off key vocals but when I do, some of the notes seem electronic or phasery. Is there a tip you guys can give me for smooth natural pitch correction? Im sure with a good singer this wouldn't be as much of a problem.
Thanks, Seth |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: quick antares auto tune 4 question
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: quick antares auto tune 4 question
Hey thanks for the awesome tips. Tbe way I use it is...after tracking, I create a new track and name it AT and run the original vocal out to a bus and set the new tracks (AT) input to the same bus I sent the original vocal out to. I fix sections at a time and then record the fixed sections to the new track. Now, the way that I insert auto tune is through the inserts in the mix window, which I know takes up more cpu. But, after I have corrected the vocals and they are recorded to the new track, if I take the inserted auto tune plug in off of the track, it will be as if I hadn't used a plug in, and the vocals will be in tune on the new track correct? I am just trying to save cpu power. Also, I got this method of correcting vocals from another post on this forum, but I dont really know why I have to use buses...I do and it works great, but couldn't I just insert auto tune on a track, fix the vocal and solo the track and record it to the new track, same thing? I dont fully understand buses yet...any help or tips would be great!
Thanks, Seth |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: quick antares auto tune 4 question
Seth ,
>> run the original vocal out to a bus and set the new tracks (AT) input to the same bus >> I dont fully understand buses yet... It looks as you are already using it ! Don't forget your ears...they are the most useful instruments in music production.. keep it up & happy tooling,
__________________
cheers, Andrew W7 pro 64_i7 3930K_16GB_ Nuendo 6.5.4-7.1.3 / PT 12.4 ------Mac Mini OSX Lion_PT 10.xx Allen&Heath GS R-24M_ full rack of vintage analog boxes _UAD2_Nugen_iZotope_Melda_Waves_Plugin Alliance_DMG and more 2.0 and 5.1 monitoring |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Antares Auto-Tune | Oblivion777 | AAX Plug-ins | 2 | 04-09-2013 02:49 PM |
Antares Auto-Tune 4 Used Value Question | timstar78 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 05-16-2008 06:10 PM |
Antares Auto-Tune | FullFreq | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 2 | 09-29-2004 07:11 AM |
Antares Auto-Tune 3 For OS X | pookadilly | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 0 | 03-08-2003 03:22 PM |
Antares Auto Tune | robert kramer | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 10-24-1999 11:43 PM |