|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Have I been off by 164 samples all along?
I'd like to consider myself an experienced enough user of Pro Tools and a bunch of other DAW's for that matter. I surf the user boards and grasp most topics without a problem.
I've always understood the concept of latency and where it can be introduced into your signal flow, and how to reduce it to it's most unobtrusive levels. My question is that aside from monitoring directly I have done nothing else to ever correct it. Should I have been nudging every piece of audio I have recorded into a session all along? thanks, Scott |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Have I been off by 164 samples all along?
I'm not sure I understand your question, you mean, for example, if you do a vocal overdub, nudge it back 164 samples because the singer was hearing themselves in the headphones with a delay of 164 samples?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Have I been off by 164 samples all along?
If you record all your tracks to a pre-existing drum track, loop or a click, they will all be 52 samples off, which you probably won't notice. You can nudge them back.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Have I been off by 164 samples all along?
164 only if you use an Mbox - or if you make abient music you would be right on...
__________________
DesertDude 1.25 Alu/1.5 ram/10.3.4 PTLE 6.4-002R-Live-Reason |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Have I been off by 164 samples all along?
Why 52?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Have I been off by 164 samples all along?
You should double-check that. That was a bug in 5.x on Mbox, might have been fixed in 6.x. Was definitely fixed in 5.3.3 (and up) on Windows.
Quote:
__________________
Quad 2.5 G5, 4.5G RAM |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Have I been off by 164 samples all along?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Have I been off by 164 samples all along?
Quote:
"Congratulations on your new car. Now, you may have noticed that it takes gas to run the car...and you may have also noticed that the gas tank we manufactured for your car has a gaping hole in the bottom which you, the consumer, must fix. You'll definitely want to patch this hole or else you won't get the best mileage out of your car. Oh, by the way, we fixed this problem in the version we sell overseas, but for some inexplicable reason, the domestic cars still have this gas-tank-hole 'feature'. Remember to fix it."
__________________
It's not rocket surgery |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Have I been off by 164 samples all along?
Sorry, I thought it was 52 samples. 164 samples is fairly noticable.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Have I been off by 164 samples all along?
Although I don't find it THAT much of a problem to remember to shift each track 164 samples earlier after recording, It is scandalous that we are STILL obliged to use this work around in lieu of Digi (HELLO!!?) sorting it out for many thousands of loyal mbox/mac users.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
using PT8 in 24 nit with 16 bit samples | converted | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 3 | 04-02-2010 11:05 PM |
samples | soulcactus | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 3 | 01-28-2007 10:01 AM |
OT - Help with Samples | roxy | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 01-04-2003 02:33 PM |
EMU samples into Mac SSC | Renie | Digidesign Hardware & Software | 3 | 11-15-2001 08:57 AM |
samples | SNAPPER | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 10-09-2000 03:12 PM |