Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-07-2004, 09:19 AM
scottevl scottevl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 2
Default Have I been off by 164 samples all along?

I'd like to consider myself an experienced enough user of Pro Tools and a bunch of other DAW's for that matter. I surf the user boards and grasp most topics without a problem.
I've always understood the concept of latency and where it can be introduced into your signal flow, and how to reduce it to it's most unobtrusive levels.
My question is that aside from monitoring directly I have done nothing else to ever correct it. Should I have been nudging every piece of audio I have recorded into a session all along?

thanks, Scott
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-07-2004, 12:57 PM
RinnyTin RinnyTin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 365
Default Re: Have I been off by 164 samples all along?

I'm not sure I understand your question, you mean, for example, if you do a vocal overdub, nudge it back 164 samples because the singer was hearing themselves in the headphones with a delay of 164 samples?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-07-2004, 01:12 PM
MidnightFlyer MidnightFlyer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: L.A.
Posts: 674
Default Re: Have I been off by 164 samples all along?

If you record all your tracks to a pre-existing drum track, loop or a click, they will all be 52 samples off, which you probably won't notice. You can nudge them back.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-07-2004, 01:23 PM
DesertDude DesertDude is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,669
Default Re: Have I been off by 164 samples all along?

164 only if you use an Mbox - or if you make abient music you would be right on...

__________________
DesertDude

1.25 Alu/1.5 ram/10.3.4
PTLE 6.4-002R-Live-Reason
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-07-2004, 01:25 PM
RinnyTin RinnyTin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 365
Default Re: Have I been off by 164 samples all along?

Why 52?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-07-2004, 01:39 PM
tele_player tele_player is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: California
Posts: 6,557
Default Re: Have I been off by 164 samples all along?

You should double-check that. That was a bug in 5.x on Mbox, might have been fixed in 6.x. Was definitely fixed in 5.3.3 (and up) on Windows.

Quote:
164 only if you use an Mbox - or if you make abient music you would be right on...


__________________
Quad 2.5 G5, 4.5G RAM


Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-07-2004, 01:56 PM
mobilemac'nstrat mobilemac'nstrat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 258
Default Re: Have I been off by 164 samples all along?

Look here:
http://answerbase.digidesign.com/detail.cfm?DID=7868
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-07-2004, 02:32 PM
Chris Coleman Chris Coleman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,656
Default Re: Have I been off by 164 samples all along?

I've always thought that "Mbox latency on a Mac" Answerbase document was hilarious. That's like a FAQ on a car manufacturer's website saying:

"Congratulations on your new car. Now, you may have noticed that it takes gas to run the car...and you may have also noticed that the gas tank we manufactured for your car has a gaping hole in the bottom which you, the consumer, must fix. You'll definitely want to patch this hole or else you won't get the best mileage out of your car.

Oh, by the way, we fixed this problem in the version we sell overseas, but for some inexplicable reason, the domestic cars still have this gas-tank-hole 'feature'. Remember to fix it."
__________________
It's not rocket surgery
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-07-2004, 02:37 PM
MidnightFlyer MidnightFlyer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: L.A.
Posts: 674
Default Re: Have I been off by 164 samples all along?

Sorry, I thought it was 52 samples. 164 samples is fairly noticable.


Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-07-2004, 02:49 PM
mobilemac'nstrat mobilemac'nstrat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 258
Default Re: Have I been off by 164 samples all along?

Although I don't find it THAT much of a problem to remember to shift each track 164 samples earlier after recording, It is scandalous that we are STILL obliged to use this work around in lieu of Digi (HELLO!!?) sorting it out for many thousands of loyal mbox/mac users.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
using PT8 in 24 nit with 16 bit samples converted 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 3 04-02-2010 11:05 PM
samples soulcactus 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 3 01-28-2007 10:01 AM
OT - Help with Samples roxy 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 2 01-04-2003 02:33 PM
EMU samples into Mac SSC Renie Digidesign Hardware & Software 3 11-15-2001 08:57 AM
samples SNAPPER 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 1 10-09-2000 03:12 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:26 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com