|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
OMF AAF Volume Automation
Avid state that "AAF is the new format and contains more information than the OMF. OMF loses the volume automation and names of the tracks when exporting and importing from one application to another. AAF retains the volume automation and the track names"
https://avid.secure.force.com/pkb/ar...S/FAQ/en331113 I’ve had been using OMF for decades prior to the AAF. The volume automation has always transferred from FCP into Protools using OMFs. Why does all Avid/Protools affiliated sites state this when i have OMF sessions from over 10 years ago that proves to me that OMFs do transfer volume automation? Other non avid related sites support my claim. Here's an example i made https://vimeo.com/619438950/bc308f8092 I'd really like to find out why this is Avid's take on it. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Volume vs Volume Trim Automation? | snowplaysmusic | Getting Started | 2 | 06-25-2021 11:20 PM |
Converting Volume Automation to Clip Gain = Higher Volume! | EricWillhelm | Pro Tools 10 | 8 | 11-01-2011 11:12 AM |
need help with volume automation | Digitalsound1 | Tips & Tricks | 4 | 07-17-2010 09:00 PM |
Volume Automation | Robbie Hollywood | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 6 | 09-24-2007 03:20 PM |
Volume Automation | hookiefree | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 8 | 08-31-2003 07:01 PM |