Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Software > macOS
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-24-2011, 02:07 PM
orbro orbro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 26
Default Why Does The Profire 2626 Suck So Much?

Just upgraded to a 2626 from a Digi 002r and am constantly getting 6101 errors regardless of how many cores I'm using. Any buffer setting other than 1024 is very unstable whether I'm recording one track with one plug in or sixteen tracks with no plug ins. I really don't think it's a system issue as I've tried the same sessions with the same buffer settings on the same drive with my 002 and everything is rock solid. The only difference is the 2626.

Can anybody help? Here are my specs.

Pro Tools 9.0.3
OSX 10.6.7
Profire 2626
Dedicated internal WD Velociraptor audio drive
2008 Mac Pro 8 core 3.2GHz with 4 gigs of ram
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-24-2011, 02:18 PM
spenner spenner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow
Posts: 1,202
Default Re: Why Does The Profire 2626 Suck So Much?

Interesting. The 2626 is the complete opposite of suck for me. I have two on PT9.0.3 and M-Powered 8 PC systems. Both solid... love em. Do you have the latest OS X 10.6.7 driver installed?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-24-2011, 04:26 PM
orbro orbro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 26
Unhappy Re: Why Does The Profire 2626 Suck So Much?

I do have the latest driver installed. Maybe it's a 9.0.3 issue? I'm just not sure why it would work flawlessly with my 002 and not with the 2626. I really want to be able to use 9.0.3 because it allows the 2626 to be used with a 32 sample buffer.

I actually have not had an issue in Pro Tools since 5.0 and really like the 2626. I just want to be able to use it the same way I used my 002.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-24-2011, 07:59 PM
spenner spenner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow
Posts: 1,202
Default Re: Why Does The Profire 2626 Suck So Much?

The only other thing I would suggest is, in the PT9 Playback Engine setup, make sure the Profire 2626 is selected as the Current Engine, not "Pro Tools Aggregate I/O". This once gave me errors on my iMac.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-24-2011, 09:16 PM
orbro orbro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 26
Default Re: Why Does The Profire 2626 Suck So Much?

Thanks Spenner but I've done that as well. Anybody have any ideas? I'm use to doing tracking sessions at a 32 sample buffer with no issues whatsoever. Now it's an absolute no go
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-25-2011, 04:33 PM
JonesH JonesH is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 159
Default Re: Why Does The Profire 2626 Suck So Much?

Check how it's connected to the FW chain. I had to connect mine in the opposite order between interface and HD to computer to get it recognized.
__________________
I just wanna do engineering...

(as opposed to make music :/ )
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-25-2011, 08:25 PM
orbro orbro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 26
Default Re: Why Does The Profire 2626 Suck So Much?

It's the only thing connected to the firewire port as I record to a dedicated internal drive. Anybody using the same configuration as me, specifically a 2008 Mac Pro?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-27-2011, 01:55 PM
orbro orbro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 26
Default Re: Why Does The Profire 2626 Suck So Much?

Any other ideas?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-27-2011, 03:03 PM
guitar486 guitar486 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 727
Default Re: Why Does The Profire 2626 Suck So Much?

I have had no problems with the 2626 on my 2008 Mac Pro, have you tried trashing the preferences? Is this happening on old sessions you are opening up or new sessions as well? I'm pretty sure PT is still not qualified for 10.6.7 so maybe that's your problem?
__________________
----I was thinking of taking a solo in the bridge.
-Nah, I don't think that would sound good.
----Ok, well how about just a series of cool riffs?

Mac Pro 2008 (Harpertown) -- OS X 10.8.2 -- 16GB RAM -- WD Black Drives -- UA Apollo Quad -- Pro Tools 10 w/ CPTK
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-27-2011, 03:35 PM
orbro orbro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 26
Default Re: Why Does The Profire 2626 Suck So Much?

Yup, 10.6.7 is qualified. I've trashed preferences, databases and did all of the basic troubleshooting that Avid recommends. Are you on 9.0.3 and are you able to track reliably at a 32 sample buffer? Am I wrong in assuming that the 2626 should work the same as my 002r in that respect?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is the Profire 2626 more stable than Profire Lightbridge? (PT8 or snow leopard?) tomv-k Pro Tools M-Powered (Mac) 5 03-09-2012 02:45 PM
Can this be done with the profire 2626 boabyd23 Pro Tools M-Powered (Mac) 7 05-04-2010 08:39 AM
Help with profire 2626 guitar486 Pro Tools M-Powered (Mac) 13 12-31-2009 03:19 PM
profire 2626 pie55 Pro Tools M-Powered (Win) 6 10-29-2009 02:41 AM
Profire 2626 spookster Pro Tools M-Powered (Mac) 5 03-06-2008 03:35 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:04 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com