Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-28-2005, 07:49 AM
fradenigris fradenigris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Roma, Italy
Posts: 16
Default Mac OS X worst than 9.2?????

Hi,
I am a 001 user, I have recently upgraded my system to a Pro Tools 6.4. Until now I have always worked with PT 5.2.1 in a 9.2.2 environment. I work on a 933MHz G4, installed Mac OS X 10.3.8 with a custom install, created two user accounts and disabled all the redundant stuff in PT account. Updated prebinding, repaired permissions and did all of the stuff mentioned in the Digidesign troubleshooting page and more. But I hate to say that my 9.2 system was more agile than the 10.3 one. Running the same session on 10.3 and 9.2 and using Altivec Fractal Carbon app to measure the number of operation per second yelded much better results in system 9. And I get many more DAE errors in OS X than in 9.

Is it so for you out there too or am I missing something?

Any help will be greatly appreciated...

Ciao

Ngr
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-28-2005, 11:24 AM
GORILLA GORILLA is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Your Ma's house...hehehe
Posts: 1,812
Default Re: Mac OS X worst than 9.2?????

How much memory did you add to your system? IS 10.3.8 cleared for PTLE 6.4? I'm running great 6.4///10.3.5///1.25gig of Mb///1.4Ghz G4
__________________
METAL LABS
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-28-2005, 11:30 AM
fradenigris fradenigris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Roma, Italy
Posts: 16
Default Re: Mac OS X worst than 9.2?????

I have 512 mB of RAM. It's not very clear to me how RAM is allocated for applications in OS X. I cannot assign more memory to PT as in OS9, can I? Maybe with more RAM things could get better...
Can you give me any enlightment?
Thanks

Ngr
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-28-2005, 11:47 AM
GORILLA GORILLA is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Your Ma's house...hehehe
Posts: 1,812
Default Re: Mac OS X worst than 9.2?????

Quote:
I have 512 mB of RAM.
Ngr
There's a big problem there! OSX loves ram!!!!! Go get more memory and you should be getting better results. At least 1.25g. Or just max (2g) your G4 out.
__________________
METAL LABS
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-28-2005, 02:54 PM
tele_player tele_player is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: California
Posts: 6,557
Default Re: Mac OS X worst than 9.2?????

Baloney...
Ok, I'll be more polite than that. 512M is enough for ProTools to work correctly, without errors using OS X. Unless you're running other programs at the same time which require lots of memory, adding more memory won't result in better performance.

You can learn a lot by running Activity Monitor. Adding more memory only results in significant performance improvements if lack of memory is causing lots of paging activity, which is reported as 'page outs' in Activity Monitor.
__________________
Quad 2.5 G5, 4.5G RAM


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-28-2005, 06:17 PM
j creasey j creasey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 313
Default Re: Mac OS X worst than 9.2?????

Only pro tools 7 is qualified for over osx 10.3.6 and you must use a 002 ! if you want to use your 001 downgrade to 0sx 10.3.4 and your troubles will go away " hint ! read compatabilities" there priceless.
good luck
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-28-2005, 07:18 PM
AverageJoe AverageJoe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 779
Default Re: Mac OS X worst than 9.2?????

there is no PTLE 7. I'm guessing you mean 6.7.

But even though that's the only officially qualified system for 10.3.8, there are lots of us running 6.4/001/10.3.8 just fine.

There might be some other setup things you still need to do- but I would tend to agree with the RAM. I have done lots of RAM swapping in and out and my dual 1GHz runs MUCH better overall with more than 512 MB.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-28-2005, 09:47 PM
lamp lamp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Ohio
Posts: 571
Default Re: Mac OS X worst than 9.2?????

Quote:
Mac OS X worst than 9.2?
Yes, OSX is a bloated hog. Go back down to 10.3.4 and PTLE 6.4cs9 and max out your ram. I only use OSX because of the apps I want to run, Reason ect. I lost three tracks on the DaveC test when I switched from 9 to OSX. But OSX is the future if you want to run curent apps.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Worst Has Happened! GothicV 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 9 02-02-2005 09:01 AM
Well the worst has happened.... TULL 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 20 10-30-2004 03:54 PM
OT: WORST MOVIES! pk_hat 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 40 08-29-2004 12:06 AM
the worst laptop that can run PT! keithl 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 3 03-24-2004 07:31 PM
it was the worst I have ever seen surchur 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 3 08-02-2001 07:50 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:06 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com