Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > Pro Tools 10
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-30-2011, 05:58 AM
gbross gbross is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 132
Default Automatic Latency Compensation & Plug Ins - Average? or Additive?

Ok, I think I have a handle on how ALC works and where and when to apply it.

Scenerio:
Guitar Track has 1000 samples of Latency
Vocal Track has 1000 samples of Latency
Drum Track has 750 samples of Latency
Bass Track has 500 samples of Latency

When setting ALC do I use the lowest setting because none of my tracks goes above 1000 samples?

Or do I add up all the numbers yielding 3250 samples and boost the ALC setting higher?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-30-2011, 06:11 AM
Ant B Ant B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 116
Default Re: Automatic Latency Compensation & Plug Ins - Average? or Additive?

set it anywhere above 1000 for that scenario
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-30-2011, 06:31 AM
gbross gbross is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 132
Default Re: Automatic Latency Compensation & Plug Ins - Average? or Additive?

I'm still unclear.

There are 3 ALC settings in the Playback Window
Short 1023 samples
Long 4095 samples
Max 16383 samples

So, using my scenerio I would be completely safe and in sync using the Short (1023) setting, correct?

Using my scenerio, if I use Long(4095) or Max(16383) it wouldn't hurt anything, correct? Or is that just overkill?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-30-2011, 06:44 AM
ejwells's Avatar
ejwells ejwells is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,530
Default Re: Automatic Latency Compensation & Plug Ins - Average? or Additive?

Nothing wrong with a bit of overkill.
__________________
Pro Tools 10.3.3 | HD Native | HD I/O 8x8x8 | Mac Pro 8 Core Westmere | 24GB RAM | OSX Lion 10.7.4 | API 3124 | Chandler TG-2 | UA 4-710d | Empirical Labs Distressor EL8X | Kemper Rack |
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-30-2011, 07:30 AM
albee1952's Avatar
albee1952 albee1952 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Norwich, CT
Posts: 39,332
Default Re: Automatic Latency Compensation & Plug Ins - Average? or Additive?

Short will do it with those latency numbers. Long will also work, and may be desirable so you don't need to change the setting if you suddenly decide to add a plugin with longer latency(Like AutoTune Evo). In any case, you only NEED to cover the single longest latency number.
__________________
HP Z4 workstation, Mbox Studio
https://www.facebook.com/search/top/...0sound%20works


The better I drink, the more I mix

BTW, my name is Dave, but most people call me.........................Dave
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-30-2011, 07:43 AM
gbross gbross is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 132
Default Re: Automatic Latency Compensation & Plug Ins - Average? or Additive?

Thank you! Totally clear now.

One more thing and I'm out of here - need clarification...

If all my tracks have NO latency but my Master Track has 3000 samples (Ozone 5 added for example). I do not need to use ADC - correct?

Sorry if I'm belaboring the point.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-30-2011, 08:31 AM
Ant B Ant B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 116
Default Re: Automatic Latency Compensation & Plug Ins - Average? or Additive?

correct

however - like someone said above - I wouldn't use the minimum setting just because your plugs don't go over that. This is an efficiency thing moreso than a technical thing. When you change ADC you have to restart the session - if you're using ADC at all it's much more efficient to set it high enough that you're covered for whichever direction your mix might take plugin/latency wise - not just high enough for your current plugin/latency needs.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-30-2011, 08:34 AM
gbross gbross is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 132
Default Re: Automatic Latency Compensation & Plug Ins - Average? or Additive?

And ALC should be turned off when recording tracks. Correct?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-01-2011, 06:40 AM
Ant B Ant B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 116
Default Re: Automatic Latency Compensation & Plug Ins - Average? or Additive?

correct.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-01-2011, 07:03 AM
Shatzer Shatzer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sherwood, AR
Posts: 602
Default Re: Automatic Latency Compensation & Plug Ins - Average? or Additive?

I keep it on during tracking, never had a problem even on big sessions with lots of plugs. What's the reason for turning it off for tracking? I haven't noticed anything unusual.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Automatic Latency Compensation - PT 10 - Am I doing this right? gbross Pro Tools 10 4 11-30-2011 04:41 AM
Automatic Plug-in Delay Compensation for PTLE Obsidian Dragon 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 11 01-01-2009 03:42 PM
LE support automatic plug-in delay compensation.?? nossnevs 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 4 10-22-2007 02:35 AM
automatic latency compensation?? Zen_Baby 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 3 01-06-2005 03:18 PM
Digi - an advances on automatic plug-in delay compensation? Live drums are hard going Jules Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 27 01-31-2000 03:34 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:50 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com