Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-17-2002, 10:08 AM
tlester tlester is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 549
Default Least expensive 32 in HD system?

Hi all -

I'm still deciding what DAW to purchase. I'm most familiar with PT's layout, so I keep coming back to it. Anyway... I need some help architecting a system based on my minimum requirements. I'd like some opinions. Here's what I need:

Base HD system
32 simultaneous ins
8 outs

I'm looking for the cheapest way to do this. I.e. utilizing the Adat, AES, and possibly TDIF imputs, as well as the analog inputs. The 192 is quite pricy, so I don't want to have to buy 4 of them to get my 32 ins. At least not at the very beginning.

Let me know what you think

-Tom
__________________
http://SpeakRecords.COM
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-17-2002, 10:11 AM
doug_hti doug_hti is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Calabasas, CA
Posts: 669
Default Re: Least expensive 32 in HD system?

two 192s, with 2 additional AD cards, making it 16 ins for each interface...the additional AD cards are somewhere around 1k...so you have 32 analog ins, 16 analog outs...
__________________
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-17-2002, 10:17 AM
Jeff D. Jeff D. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 811
Default Re: Least expensive 32 in HD system?

If you can live with 32 inputs at 44.1/48 khz only, you could get:

192 + A/D expansion card
1622 I/O connected to legacy port on 192

That's what I did and it works great. 32 simultaneous inputs. The inputs on the 1622 are a little lower in quality, but work great for keyboards, drum machines, scratch vocals, room mics, etc. I route the important stuff to the 192's inputs.

This also gets you 10 outputs (8 from the 192 and 2 from the 1622).

I found a 1622 on eBay for $750.

Good luck,

Jeff D.
__________________
www.jephthastudios.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-17-2002, 01:36 PM
jic3 jic3 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 136
Default Re: Least expensive 32 in HD system?

I believe you can only have 16 simultaneous inputs on the 192 regardless of format (adat, xlr, analog,etc.)

Good luck,
J
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-17-2002, 02:58 PM
tlester tlester is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 549
Default Re: Least expensive 32 in HD system?

So... what do you guys think of this:

1 Core
2 192's
2 8xMic pre w/ ADAT out (aka Prosonus or Octopre).

That would give me 32 ins and 16 outs. Then I could get some "nicer" pre's for the analog ins.

Can the ADAT in's do 96K? Can you tell that I'm an analog guy ;-)

-t
__________________
http://SpeakRecords.COM
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-17-2002, 07:25 PM
aswstudios aswstudios is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 64
Default Re: Least expensive 32 in HD system?

Unfortunatelty Tom DIGI did not use the S/MUX
protocol on these Optical connections so as far as high res recording goes they are worthless. Furthermore you can have 16 ins and outs from 1 192 I/O but they have to be in banks of eight according to digidesign.
ex AD Ins 1 8 ------ DA Outs 1-8
not ADAT Ins 1-4--AD Ins 5-8 -------
ADAT Outs 1-4--DA Outs 5-8.....
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-18-2002, 12:31 AM
tlester tlester is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 549
Default Re: Least expensive 32 in HD system?

What about the light pipe inputs on the 192? How many are there. I see two sets of optical (one of the Digi card, and on on the 192 main section). Are they both 8 channel ADAT light pipes? If so, that would give me 24 ins on one 192. I'd have to front it with and A/D or something like a Prosonus Digimax, but that would be OK.

Does anyone do this?

-Tom
__________________
http://SpeakRecords.COM
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
pro tools is expensive so... JhunBorruel Pro Tools 10 46 04-29-2012 01:49 PM
Does This seem expensive to you? funeral 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 4 02-20-2007 10:17 AM
Least Expensive was to get into TDM PhatBit Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 22 06-03-2005 02:41 AM
Which is more expensive? Sudsy 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 5 12-10-2001 10:52 PM
Best, least expensive CD burners... sidereal General Discussion 7 12-29-2000 09:54 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:33 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com