Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Software > Pro Tools
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-29-2022, 08:30 AM
audiogamble audiogamble is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Canada
Posts: 237
Default Re: What am I missing? I expected better.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raphaeld View Post
Interesting, I didn't suspect this.
Also to note, the amount of latency any given plugin adds is fixed at different sample rates. This is built in by the plugin developers for various reasons.

Some plugins, like neutron or liquidsonics reverb for example, do have "low latency" or "zero latency" options in their settings. That is achieved either by taxing the computer's CPU more heavily, or by removing some high-powered processing within the plugin thereby changing the sound quality slightly. Again, these are on/off features of the plugins themselves, and do not auto-scale via detection of the host computer's processing capabilities.

So in conclusion, you just need to get to know which plugins add latency and which do not. And when that is / isn't a problem.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-29-2022, 09:04 AM
Raphaeld Raphaeld is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: Wilton, CT
Posts: 50
Default Re: What am I missing? I expected better.

SOLVED

So, in the spirit of helping another member who may see this I have solved the problem, for now. Like with most problems, there were a number of factors.

First the results
o no delay, nothing even amber
o I have my playback engine at 128 samples and cache size at "normal." (4TB SSD)
o My CPU runs at 52% for the complete song (I have a Mac Studio Ultra)
o UAD DSP @ 48% (have have an x4 and two satellites)


In no order in particular here is what changed to fix it and take advantage of my system:
o I switched from using one instance of Opus and 7 channels to 11 instances of Opus on 11 different instrument tracks. Once instance/track.

FYI-I have all my busses (i.e. drum bus, guitars bus, etc.) going to aux sends called, for example, MX_DMS, MX_BG, MX_GTRs, MX_LVOX, etc. This makes it easy for me to do automation on the bus faders while still letting me quickly tweak the MX_nn faders. All the MX_nn auxes goes to an aux called MX_MIX and then out. This lets me raise and lower the entire mix easily and also is useful for automation like raising the overall volume for the chorus.

o I had my non-vocals reverb send channeled to the above MX_MIX aux which was also getting all the MX_nn auxes as well. Basically, I had a lot of channels going to MX_MIX. Obviously, PT couldn't keep up. I created a new aux MX_FX and sent MX_FX to MX_MIX and that removed all red delay.

o I had only one Neutron 4 instance on MX_LVOX. I removed it and that made a difference. I'm sorry, I like Neutron.

o I like to use UA plugins. Even though I have a lot of DSP I decided, anytime I have a choice, I'll use the Spark version so it'll use the computer's powerful CPU and, even though minimal, there's no need to run out to my satellites and back. Also, I suspect my CPU is much faster than the ones in the satellites.

o Lastly, for some reason, the xUAD SSL Bus Compressor was causing a lot of delays. I had one on each of the seven MX_xx auxes. I replaced them all with the xUAD API 2500 and green all around.

This experience, while frustrating at times, really helped me improve my template which let's me work in PT the way that works well for me and, so far, let's me take advantage of my new gear. The major lesson learned was, while plugins are always the usual suspects for good reason, your routing can cause delays too.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-29-2022, 09:37 AM
indeloon85 indeloon85 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 148
Default Re: What am I missing? I expected better.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raphaeld View Post
SOLVED

o Lastly, for some reason, the xUAD SSL Bus Compressor was causing a lot of delays. I had one on each of the seven MX_xx auxes. I replaced them all with the xUAD API 2500 and green all around.
Side Question - the mention of an 'xUAD SSL Bus Compressor' makes me think they've released a spark/native version of this plugin (Like the mentioned xUAD API 2500). Is that true?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-29-2022, 09:51 AM
Raphaeld Raphaeld is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: Wilton, CT
Posts: 50
Default Re: What am I missing? I expected better.

Quote:
Originally Posted by indeloon85 View Post
Side Question - the mention of an 'xUAD SSL Bus Compressor' makes me think they've released a spark/native version of this plugin (Like the mentioned xUAD API 2500). Is that true?
Good catch! That helps me, the SSL Bus Compressor was the DSP version and removing it improved the speed so that aligns with my theory. I went from the DSP SSL to the non-DSP API and saw the red disappear immediately on each bus.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BFD lite? does not act as expected b mcgibney 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 3 11-24-2008 07:23 PM
What can be expected at NAMM mik Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 10 12-29-2006 04:20 PM
When is PT's 7 expected? TCDet Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 5 10-24-2005 02:05 PM
Digi 003. When is it expected? JasonGough 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 2 09-18-2005 11:44 AM
1.6 GHz G5 expected in 2 months! Slaterman 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 9 11-30-2001 05:02 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:24 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com