|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#311
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT8 CPU Usage
+1 for the suggestion that known working configurations should be posted. PTLE has never been compatible with all hardware--this is well documented and understood--so why the heck have updated known-working PT8 hardware specs not already been posted by Digi if only a small percent of users (with evidently incompatible hardware) have been impacted?
I'm kinda DOA here because my current antique rig won't keep up with the level of complexity of my current project session track count/DVIs and I'm afraid to pull the trigger on new hardware if I don't know for sure what will run PT8. It's like buying a new car without wheels and then having to leave it on blocks in the driveway for six months because the manufacturer can't tell you what wheels are compatible with the #@#!#$ thing!!! |
#312
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT8 CPU Usage
Quote:
Quote:
It's more like they're selling the wheels but then not telling you what vehicles it'll fit, or that it only fits on certain vehicles. And hell if you've ever bought wheels before you'll know THAT IS THE CASE. So really not a very good analogy all around... They have told you what configurations Pro Tools is compatible with, and you don't like the answer. By straying from it, you're either not listening or think you know better! |
#313
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT8 CPU Usage
Quote:
There is a member here who is using one of the "qualified systems" and is experiencing the same problems... I will bet my bottom dollar there are more out there as well. The list is not the "be all to end all". It is not completely immune to the issue. His analogy may not be perfect, but his point is still well taken. We need a list of confirmed working machines, which the "qualified list is not". With all due respect, no one here is interested in semantics; we need solutions not analogical critiques. |
#314
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT8 CPU Usage
Quote:
I have been using Pro Tools 8 on an un-supported machine of late, and did not experience this big problem, so I can't directly relate to it unfortunately. I've also been using it on supported machines since October with no problems. There is likely a common theme somewhere with the machines that experience this - and it is likely to do with the graphics cards involved. By the way I don't mean to sound at all inflamatory in my posts - sorry if I come across like that. I just wanna help! |
#315
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT8 CPU Usage
Quote:
I know you do pezking. And you have been helpful. I think many already have computers that are not on the list, and are hoping that PT8 will work anyway. To have to purchase an expensive machine to support the application seems a little over the top, as other software works on a multitude of hardware configurations and their current machines worked so well on PT7.X. For instance, I would not have bought PT8 if it was absolutely mandatory I buy one of the qualified machines for it to work. This adds a LOT of expence over just buying PT8. I think many others here would agree with that as well. The qualified list is a list of machines that DIGI tested on and found to work with PT8. My experience over the years is that these lists are helpful, but vendors' software will work on machines that are not part of their qualified lists as well. PT8 has a very limited list of qualified machines and the developers need to find a way to widen the hardware compatibility. It appears that DIGI is working the fix and hopfully this will do just that, widen the compatibility and allow for users who don't have these OEM machines to use the software without seeing this issue... I always appreciate your input here..... |
#316
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT8 CPU Usage
Bump.
|
#317
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT8 CPU Usage
And now? Anybody noticed some CS3 improvements on the named issue...?
|
#318
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT8 CPU Usage
I do not believe CS3 contains the fix for this issue. In fact DIGI did say the fix would not be contained in a CS release.
|
#319
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT8 CPU Usage
Quote:
Apparently there are none. Consequently I *have* read through the user experience forums--specifically the i7 builds--and I have placed a $1500 bet that the hardware I ordered to custom-build my next machine (just so that I can install and run the LE8 software I purchased months ago) will actually run. I did not order any hardware that was not explicitly mentioned in that thread so I'm hoping that I have a least a 50-50 chance of having a functional machine when I'm done. I would have appreciated some definitive direction from Digi, but as none was forthcoming, I had little choice but to take my chances and forge ahead--or completely abandon Pro Tools. |
#320
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT8 CPU Usage
Quote:
And as I mentioned in the last post, I'm not trying to stray from any specified hardware nor do I think I 'know better'--I just can't find where any PTLE 8 compatible hardware is specified. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What would normal disk usage considered to be in the usage window? | Digitopian | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 7 | 09-08-2009 09:50 PM |
Help understanding CPU Usage, RAM, Disk Usage... | Bezo | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 12 | 02-03-2006 07:41 PM |
HTDM not showing CPU usage in the system usage | Brandonx1 | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Win) | 3 | 12-19-2004 09:45 AM |
CPU usage | Room24Prod | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 3 | 11-16-2004 06:20 PM |
DSP Usage? | Smithtrax | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 1 | 10-15-2003 02:13 PM |