Avid Pro Audio Community
How to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support
|
|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
|
#1
09-05-2006, 03:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Bypassing C|24
I'm using a 002R and a Presonus Digimax for 1-8 and 9 - 16 respectively. Since the 002R gets 9-16 through the optical, am I gaining anything at all by splitting my inputs between the C|24 (9-16) and the Presonus?
Isn't the 002R/PTLE what actually determines the assignment of tracks to the C|24? not the otherway around? I am about to reposition my equipment which will mean disconnecting and re-routing cables. If I don't really need the Y-cords I might as well eliminate them. Thanks Stainless
__________________
Stainless - G5 2.3x2, 5 GB RAM, 1.5TB, OSX 10.5.x and 8.0 002R/D8, MC Control/MC Mix, etc, etc, etc 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bypassing the preamps | stainless | ICON & C|24 | 9 | 05-26-2007 05:19 AM |
| Bypassing 002 converters? | MaKoRancid | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 7 | 04-18-2007 11:51 AM |
| bypassing the pre-amps? | stainless | ICON & C|24 | 3 | 05-26-2006 01:20 AM |
| Bypassing Pre & A/D Conversion | Dk0rr | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 09-29-2004 01:26 PM |
| Bypassing ALL plug-ins? | dBHEAD | Tips & Tricks | 3 | 10-30-2001 08:10 AM |
Linear Mode
