|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ye or ne ---- 176/192khz recording/mixing
ye or ne?
i wanna see if anyone actually claims to record and mix at 176 or 192 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ye or ne ---- 176/192khz recording/mixing
Nay.
Most plugs won't work, resource allocation (memory, HD space) too high.
__________________
Mac Pro 2013 2.7GHz 12 Core 128GB • Mac OS 10.5.5 • PT Ultimate 2020.5.0 • PT HDX3 • 192 IO x 8 • D-Control 32 Fader • UAD2 Octo Ultimate |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ye or ne ---- 176/192khz recording/mixing
mos def, ill be sticking with 88.2 for cd / 96 for dvd
just wanted to see if anyone would even respond, ha! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ye or ne ---- 176/192khz recording/mixing
I've thought about it a couple of times.... but then I chicken out and stick with 96K. None of my engineer buds in Nashville cutting at 192K either... but that's not to say it's not happening out there somewhere.
There's still a bunch cutting at 44.1K and 48K..... some even on OS9 as well. BT |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ye or ne ---- 176/192khz recording/mixing
Have done it on specific music occasions, but 96 is great for most music purposes - not to mention the lack of tracks at 192. All of post is great at 48!
__________________
Jonathan Wales Sonic Magic Studios Culver City CA |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: ye or ne ---- 176/192khz recording/mixing
the jamie palumbo classical guitar CD i produced was done at 192
i cut 3 mics on his european made spanish guitar and added some L2 or L3 we chose not to take to mastering engineer as he liked the sound in his car better than other classical guitar cds he loves http://www.earbuzz.com/Action.lasso?...=15677&-Search
__________________
CAZADOR RECORDING PT10.3.10/HD6/192w16in/MTN.LION OS 10.8.5 / Westmere MacPro 8 Core W/20gRAM MAGMA-PE6R4/TDM&RTAS/WAVES Platinum/UA/Eventide Plugs/I usually record at 88.2 With GOD as my partner. . . I need to make my plans LARGER. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ye or ne ---- 176/192khz recording/mixing
which palumbo cd was it?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ye or ne ---- 176/192khz recording/mixing
Nay,
Data management is hard enough at 96K. I couldn't imagine having to back up even more data. Besides, does it really sound better after it's been crushed down to a mp3(160). hmmmm...... I guess it does, but it most likely won't sell more CD's. A great song will be a great song at any sample rate..... Roger
__________________
Roger Arnold |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ye or ne ---- 176/192khz recording/mixing
well yeah, but sometimes geeks like me need a little techy bull**** to lose sleep over
if its "hidef sample rates or not?" today, it could be something else tommorow haha adam |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ye or ne ---- 176/192khz recording/mixing
I don't even like the hit on my DSP with 96k when doing big mixes in the box. But I do think the converters sound great at 192k. If I was doing a project that was meant to be real hifi and wasn't going to use more than 16 tracks, I might try it. For me it's about the converters. Once it is in the box, I'm pretty much just as happy with 96k (or even 48k). If you're mixing on a board and ProTools is just a tape machine then 192 really makes sense.
STeve
__________________
macmandigital.com |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Profire 2626 recording 192khz?? | Kemo3ce | macOS | 2 | 12-19-2012 07:32 PM |
Recording 192khz gives audio error 6061? | olamo | macOS | 0 | 03-18-2012 12:53 PM |
192khz recording | capt kirk | Pro Tools 9 | 1 | 02-12-2012 09:16 AM |
I cant go to 192KHZ | KINGDRAGON | Tips & Tricks | 2 | 01-29-2010 11:57 PM |
Anyone recording at 192kHz? | Rupert Limehouse | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 17 | 10-07-2009 11:36 AM |