|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
BTD-16 bit 44.1k sessions sound better?
I just did a session 16bit/44.1. I bounced to disc just for ruff-mixes. They sound so much more like the pre-BTD, Is that because there's less numbers to crunch as opposed to 24 bit? There's more depth and there's no muffle sound like I get with 24 bit sessions. The BTD mystery continues...
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DAE Error now no sound from some sessions | gofortheheart | Windows | 1 | 01-15-2013 06:11 AM |
Sound Sample Library Same Drive As Sessions? | PatrickJ | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 3 | 11-29-2011 12:44 PM |
New sessions in PT9 are defaulting to the wrong sound device | thisjanuary | macOS | 35 | 02-04-2011 04:14 AM |
Sessions sound different in Leopard & Snow Leopard | the.engineer | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 15 | 08-27-2010 11:57 AM |
Creating bounced sessions to sound as good as ProT | KJR | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 5 | 09-18-2006 06:15 AM |