Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-26-2010, 10:25 AM
sweetness sweetness is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 50
Default 2010 iMac 27" i7 quad VS 2009 MacPro 2.66 Xeon

I am about to buy into a new machine.

I'd be doing some mixes in PT LE, with quicktime video.

I'll also be editing video. 1080p ProRes in Final Cut Pro. Some Apple Color and After Effects.

Looking at the new iMac, with OWC eSATA retrofit vs a Refurb 2009 Mac Pro with internal softraid.

The i7 seems like a speed boost over the 2.66 Xeon Quad plus it has a stronger graphics card. I'm wondering what you guys would suggest here, are there some other hardware issues that I'm overlooking that would give the mac pro the edge?

Mac Pro 2009 specs:
http://tinyurl.com/ylx37hb
Imac i5/i7
http://tinyurl.com/2v8nfc8

Thanks much.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-26-2010, 12:21 PM
ssealy ssealy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Denver
Posts: 2
Default Re: 2010 iMac 27" i7 quad VS 2009 MacPro 2.66 Xeon

Hi, I just purchase the iMac 27" i3 to replace my older Mac Pro-- it was a dual G5 1.8 gHz. I'm running a digi 002 interface. My main reason for switching was because of the loud fan sound from the Mac Pro-- I had to bury it under a bunch of blankets.
The Mac Pro Tower does have much more flexibility as far as internal drives and expansion slots. For my Final Cut, I use a quad Mac Pro with AJA Kona-- something you wouldn't be able to do with iMac.
But the iMac is a beautiful, fast and quiet computer-- I'm hoping it'll be a nice fit for music recording.
I'm wondering what you mean by the OWC eSata retrofit. How would you use that with the iMac?
Thanks,
Steve
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-27-2010, 11:01 PM
ssealy ssealy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Denver
Posts: 2
Default Re: 2010 iMac 27" i7 quad VS 2009 MacPro 2.66 Xeon

Thanks for the eSata info! I get my iMac this week, I'll let you know how it goes. I'm a little concerned about having only one FireWire port-- I read that I should connect the drive first and then connect my digi 002 from the drive. The digi 002 is only a :FireWire 400 so I ordered an 800-400 adapter.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2008 Mac Pro w/ lots of ram or 2009/2010 w/ low ram? Ross H macOS 6 08-29-2011 03:19 PM
iMac "Quad Core" worth it? KinetiX20fifth 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 15 12-03-2010 11:20 AM
2009 Quad or 2009 8-Core Nehalem? psmworld Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 8 04-08-2010 03:18 AM
3x 27" iMac core i7 or 1x 2009 8core Mac Pro? logicalways General Discussion 14 01-03-2010 08:13 AM
New MacPro Intel Xeon "Nehelam" MusoPro Post - Surround - Video 1 03-12-2009 01:29 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:21 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com