Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > Pro Tools 12

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 05-24-2016, 01:58 AM
Morten folmer Morten folmer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Copenhagen/Denmark
Posts: 9
Default Re: Delay compensation ignored on commit?

connor@@vid i have a session i would like submit. where can i send it to?

thanks

Last edited by Morten folmer; 05-24-2016 at 02:00 AM. Reason: i put in a name
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-24-2016, 04:02 AM
nigelpry's Avatar
nigelpry nigelpry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Home
Posts: 2,166
Default Re: Delay compensation ignored on commit?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric Lambert View Post
I strongly disagree and can't find any single reason why the two need to match. There should be an evolution of this technology, not an adherence to an unnecessary and antiquated limitation. What would be the practical point of that? When we make the decision to commit a track we've left real-time audio for good reason and we want audio in sync.

In fact, "commit" could become a NEW option for situations when a track is forced to cross the compensation threshold. I'd even argue that it makes zero sense to limit this function artificially IF ProTools is able to compensate for any delay when freezing tracks.

Out of curiosity, how does Logic deal with this?
More fundamentally .... Why, when doing a "ground up', "complete rewrite", of Pro Tools for 64bit, did Avid choose to perpetuate an archaic limit on maximum length of delay compensation?

Surely Avid must have known that there are commercially released plugins around that by their very nature generate long delays? Was this another piece of old code that was simply copied and pasted, warts and all, into the 64bit compiler?
__________________
Mac Pro 2009 with 2010 firmware, 12-Core 3.46ghz, 64gb RAM & working Thunderbolt, OS 10.14.6 and Windows 10
Macbook Pro 2011 17", 2.2ghz i7, 16gb RAM OS 10.12.6
Digi 003 Console, Focusrite OctopreLE and MOTU Traveler for extra analog-ADAT conversion, UAD Apollo Quad Silver with Thunderbolt card, Apollo x4 and pci-e Octo, Adam A77X monitors.
Pro Tools 2020.3, Media Composer 8.9, Sibelius 8.7, Cubase Pro 10.5, Wavelab Pro 10, Logic Pro X 10.4.8, Mainstage 3.
Various apps, soft synths, FX plugins.
Plenty of hardware synths, rack gear, microphones etc.
And then there's the studio ;-)
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-08-2017, 06:09 PM
johnnymacvkguitar johnnymacvkguitar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Oswego, IL
Posts: 6
Default Re: Delay compensation ignored on commit?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dankin View Post
No issues with Slate Trigger. Wonder if it's something to do with those plugins?
I was using Slate Trigger and after committing my snare tracks they moved in my session and I found out the hard way with a client remarking the snare flams that were happening where they shouldn't be. They were committed and the time stamp is of course off from the original. How can I report this to AVID?
:-(
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-08-2017, 11:20 PM
H-Musikk H-Musikk is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 96
Default Re: Delay compensation ignored on commit?

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnymacvkguitar View Post
I was using Slate Trigger and after committing my snare tracks they moved in my session and I found out the hard way with a client remarking the snare flams that were happening where they shouldn't be. They were committed and the time stamp is of course off from the original. How can I report this to AVID?
:-(
I experience the same with Drumagog...
__________________
Regards
www.h-musikk.no/english.html
Norway
ASUS X99-E, Intel Core i7-6850K, Noctua NH-U9S, Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133MHz 16GB, Samsung 960 EVO 250GB M.2 PCIe SSD (System), Samsung 850 EVO 500GB 2.5" SSD (Data), Samsung 850 EVO 1TB 2.5" SSD (Sample), WD Desktop Black 1TB 3.5" (Audio), Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060, Corsair RM750x 750W, Samsung 34" LED Curved, Windows 10 Pro 64-bit, Lynx AES16e, Aurora 16, Cakewalk by BandLab, Pro Tools 2021
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-14-2019, 06:03 AM
Pyxis360 Pyxis360 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 26
Default Re: Delay compensation ignored on commit?

Hello all

I'm on 2019.5 and Mojave, committing tracks with a hardware insert creates an audio track that is out of time.

If listening in realtime it's fine.

I've tried everything. An empty project with nothing but a single track and a hardware insert, tried turning compensation blue, etc. Nothing.

Has there been any update on this?

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-03-2021, 11:17 AM
LoZion's Avatar
LoZion LoZion is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Montreal
Posts: 349
Default Re: Delay compensation ignored on commit?

Bumping this old thread to see how commit is now with the new Hybrid engine and side chain compensation..
__________________
"The secret in life is to have no fear"
Fela Anikulapo Kuti
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-03-2021, 01:48 PM
JFreak's Avatar
JFreak JFreak is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 21,934
Default Re: Delay compensation ignored on commit?

Commit is working fine, wxcept if you use bad plugins like Waves and Slate.
__________________
Janne
What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-03-2021, 02:17 PM
LoZion's Avatar
LoZion LoZion is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Montreal
Posts: 349
Default Re: Delay compensation ignored on commit?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JFreak View Post
Commit is working fine, wxcept if you use bad plugins like Waves and Slate.
Txs Janne.
Any instances where the i/o plug is bypassed by hybrid, depending on plug order?
__________________
"The secret in life is to have no fear"
Fela Anikulapo Kuti
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-03-2021, 02:37 PM
JFreak's Avatar
JFreak JFreak is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 21,934
Default Re: Delay compensation ignored on commit?

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoZion View Post
Txs Janne.
Any instances where the i/o plug is bypassed by hybrid, depending on plug order?
You only need to have one bad plugin to be loaded into memory (not necessarily instantiated in session) to cause random trouble. Only fix is to get rid of it as in move to unused plugins folder.
__________________
Janne
What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 08-03-2021, 03:49 PM
LoZion's Avatar
LoZion LoZion is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Montreal
Posts: 349
Default Re: Delay compensation ignored on commit?

I meant approved plugs, so AAX DSP before or after the i/o plug in DSP mode will work but native in either order wont.. right?
__________________
"The secret in life is to have no fear"
Fela Anikulapo Kuti
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
help fixing plugin delay and delay compensation disaster prestonhavill macOS 14 12-24-2014 03:35 PM
Pro Tools 9 Delay and Delay Compensation on Aux Tracks and Bussing CNSound macOS 1 01-27-2012 11:10 AM
To Commit or not to Commit, that is the question. georgejw22 Pro Tools 10 10 12-20-2011 05:30 AM
Delay compensation- choice of 'Medium delay'? dtmprod Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 2 05-05-2010 11:00 PM
Delay Compensation - Delay Monitoring when REC Howardk Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 2 06-18-2006 08:59 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:56 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com