Avid Pro Audio Community
How to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support
|
|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
|
#1
02-18-2008, 04:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Expected latency with software instruments
Hi, I have Protools M-powered 7.1x with a M-Audio USB Audiophile. It works great so far (without instruments) but at a 256 samples latency (5.8 ms), which is a lot I think especially when comparing Logic on Leopard with a Firewire interface where I can run stable at 128 samples or less... So what latency should you expect in Protools M-powered? What latency should I expect from a Firewire M-Audio interface instead of a USB? 256 samples is too much for software instruments I think so... How do I improve it? I cannot even see a option less than 128 samples in the program..? Does this mean this software is not suitable for software instrument? Latency is everything when playing software instruments. Anyone running stable at 128 samples? How? /floatingpoint_32bit 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| no sound from most of the software instruments | bsateb | Pro Tools SE and Essential (Mac) | 1 | 06-11-2013 11:34 AM |
| Virtual instruments and latency | brianf | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 05-06-2007 05:03 PM |
| Latency with Soft Instruments? | Cliffy_Boy | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 0 | 03-20-2005 07:42 AM |
| software instruments | coreybox | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 02-09-2005 02:51 PM |
| Native Instruments Latency | Voutsonios | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 5 | 01-14-2002 02:59 PM |
Threaded Mode