|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post Community Terms of Use Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search Community Search Learn & Support |
#41
|
||||
|
||||
Re: PT12 has less Instrument Tracks?
Quote:
__________________
Mac Pro 2009 with 2010 firmware, 12-Core 3.46ghz, 64gb RAM & working Thunderbolt, OS 10.14.6 and Windows 10 iMac 2012 27", 3.4ghz i7, 32gb RAM OS 10.14.6 Digi 003 Console for control surface only, Focusrite OctopreLE and MOTU Traveler for extra analog-ADAT conversion, UAD Apollo Quad Silver with Thunderbolt card, Apollo x4 and pci-e Octo, Adam A77X monitors. Pro Tools 2022.4, Media Composer 8.9, Sibelius 8.7, Cubase Pro 11, Wavelab Pro 11, Logic Pro X 10.5.1, Mainstage 3. Various apps, soft synths, FX plugins. Plenty of hardware synths, rack gear, microphones etc. And then there's the studio ;-) |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT12 has less Instrument Tracks?
Quote:
Pro Tools 12 and Pro Tools HD 12 will have the same Instrument Track numbers as Pro Tools 11, when they were doubled from the number in Pro Tools 10. This is from the What’s New in Pro Tools 11.pdf... Increased Instrument Track Count Pro Tools 11 supports up to 128 Instrument tracks. Pro Tools HD 11 supports up to 256 Instrument tracks. Same numbers in Pro Tools 12. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT12 has less Instrument Tracks?
I would just like to chime in and mention that there is some precedence for these kinds of typos. I found a very similar typo for PT10:
http://duc.avid.com/showthread.php?t=333081 |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT12 has less Instrument Tracks?
Quote:
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT12 has less Instrument Tracks?
Quote:
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT12 has less Instrument Tracks?
A "typo"? I'm suspicious.
More likely that marketing decision was quickly reversed after the negative feedback it generated. I'm sure that within the PT application code changing the number of instrument tracks is simply changing a configuration setting that controls the maximum number of tracks. So for a developer it's literally a 2-second code change. Marketing says make it 128 again. Change the number 64 in the config file to 128. Done. Dean Quote:
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
Re: PT12 has less Instrument Tracks?
Quote:
Why in hell would Avid do this on purpose? Do you think that they don't have more inportant issues to deal with than secretly planning this rediculous conspiracy theorie of yours? Everything is not conspiracies and people at Avid are human beings and as clearly documented everywhere humans make mistakes and correct accordingly. Its just life! Just wait until EVERYTHING is clear and release notes inplace instead of making such a HUGE issue of every detail you find "odd" Christopher
__________________
Best Regards Christopher #thestruggleisreal South Side Music Group WEBHOME |
#48
|
||||
|
||||
Re: PT12 has less Instrument Tracks?
Quote:
Seriously, it seems they do what they want do and can weather whatever storm it brings. That's been the recent history. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT12 has less Instrument Tracks?
L O L, you are so wrong!
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pro Tools FAQ is now updated for PT12, etc. | nst7 | Pro Tools 11 | 120 | 01-25-2015 01:08 PM |
2 instrument tracks each controlled by different MIDI input/instrument | Midimax | Pro Tools M-Powered (Win) | 0 | 03-20-2012 03:10 PM |
Applying Instrument Tracks to Reg. Audio Tracks | d00m1001 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 6 | 03-13-2009 08:55 PM |
MIDI Tracks Versus Instrument Tracks. VERY Confused. | Rick540 | MIDI | 8 | 12-04-2008 11:04 AM |
No Instrument Insert on Instrument tracks | Bazbo | Virtual Instruments | 4 | 03-01-2007 06:00 AM |