|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
New Macs vs Mac mini vs MacBook Pro
Ok. For post production where I use a San (no internal drives for data storage) is anyone else thinking of which Mac might pair best now that we have to use a thunderbolt chassis? Does this bring the mini and MacBook Pro Into the equation?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: New Macs vs Mac mini vs MacBook Pro
This new MBP seems to work very well with PT11 and ThunderBolt HDN. With 16GB memory and i7 cpu I have not yet experienced any hiccups. And I love this retina display
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Macs vs Mac mini vs MacBook Pro
That's what I'm wondering. Pair that with a big 27" display and Icon and you're in business.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: New Macs vs Mac mini vs MacBook Pro
Yep.
Generally speaking that i7 architecture of Intel's seem to be the major requirement for PT11. As for memory, well... that depends. I'm not a heavy VI user so I could live with less memory, but then again I love Disk Cache and I usually run about 30GB sessions so I would love to be able to double the RAM in this little laptop :) :) :)
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: New Macs vs Mac mini vs MacBook Pro
Jfreak a few comments then a question - agree, the MBPr is absolutely awesome! I would also add that this setup plus a nice 50" HDTV is also wonderful...not always necessary to have all Apple stuff!
As to the question, I also have backup MBP (not retina) with 16 GB RAM. Can I use that one as a "slave" per se to access the RAM if need be? I don't use tons of VI's either but it's nice to know options. Sent from my PT beating heart
__________________
A Rig: MacBook Pro Spring 2013, 2.8Ghz I7, 16GB RAM, OSX Mavericks 10.9.4, PT 11.2, MBox Pro 3, Glyph GT 050 Qx3 1.5 TB drives Thunderbolt-FW400, Presonus Faderport. 10 REMOVED! B Rig:MacBook Pro Spring 11, 2.33 GHz I7, 16GB RAM, OSX Mavericks 10.9.4, PT 11.2, MBox Pro 3, Glyph Portagig 62 portable 1 TB drive Firewired with 400, Presonus Faderport. 10 REMOVED! I am the main songwriter/performer for Midwest Whitetail, Cabela's Deer Nation, Spring Thunder, and Northern Waters Series! |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: New Macs vs Mac mini vs MacBook Pro
If you have two PT11 licenses, then sure, why not. Have two systems running and sync them together. That is how they do the million dollar films in Hollywood studios. There has never been a PT system that can handle a thousand tracks at once, not to mention the processing needed.
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Macs vs Mac mini vs MacBook Pro
You mean SAN as in fiberchannel? Or do you really mean NAS as in Ethernet or are you running iSCSI or what? What exact storage connector comes into the Mac and what protocol (e.g. iSCSI) are you running over that?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Macs vs Mac mini vs MacBook Pro
Hey Darryl,
I'm using a sns evo over cat6 1000gb Ethernet. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Macs vs Mac mini vs MacBook Pro
OK, more really a NAS then, and no harder fiberchannel connectivity issues to think through. And as long as you are not doing things like using two separate Ethernet connections all the Macs should be OK with this.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trying to use Mbox Mini (III Gen) with PT 10.3.2 on my MacBook Pro | jjtarnow | macOS | 7 | 06-28-2013 04:29 AM |
New Macs introduced! New Imac, Mac Mini, 13" Retina Macbook Pro | nst7 | Pro Tools 10 | 22 | 10-25-2012 10:49 AM |
MacBook and MBox 2 mini | fikafer | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 6 | 08-20-2008 09:36 AM |
MBox Mini + 7.4 on MacBook | TCLguy1 | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 0 | 02-28-2008 06:48 PM |
MBox 2 Mini on a MacBook Pro | sunburst79 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 5 | 02-24-2007 05:15 PM |