|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Actual performance specs of the new PPC 970 (G5)
From:
http://www.macbidouille.com/niouzcon...ate=2003-05-05 The first benchmarks were done during March 2003 on a preview model running at 1.4 GHz. OS was an alpha version 7B5 and 7B8 of Panther, optimised for 64 bits processor, but the applications tested were only using 32 bits. Photoshop : PPC 970 mono 1.4 is 87% faster than a Dual 1.42 GHz Final Cut Pro : PPC 970 mono 1.4 is 112% faster than a Dual 1.42 GHz Alias|Wavefront Maya Render : PPC 970 mono 1.4 is 254% faster than a Dual 1.42 GHz The Altivec shows a 80% increase of performances with the 970. This is not due to the chip itself, but to the high speed access between processor and central memory. The Mach 64 motherboard is highly optimised for the use of DDR-SDRAM. - There is no performance loss when the PPC 970 executes some 32 bits apps. - The motherboard optimization almost allows dual processors to reach double performance. In fact it's about 90% efficiency gained with the second processor, compared to 50% for the G4.
__________________
Park The Transfer Lab at Video Park Analog tape to Pro Tools transfers, 1/4"-2" http://www.videopark.com MacPro 6 core 3.33 GHz, OS 10.12.1, 8 GB RAM, PT12.6.1, Focusrite Saffire Pro 40, PreSonus DigiMax, MC Control V3.5, dual displays, Neumann U-47, Tab V76 mic pre, RCA 44BX and 77DX, MacBook Pro 9,1, 2.3 Mhz, i7, CBS Labs Audimax and Volumax. Ampex 440B half-track and four-track, 351 tube full-track mono, MM-1100 16-track. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Actual performance specs of the new PPC 970 (G5)
le' Sick!
i guess that they will have to re-code apps a bit to take advantage of the 64bit's. I wonder if that is a huge task? The new question is......... Is Digi working on it yet? Lets hope so......
__________________
www.LiveFromDarylsHouse.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Actual performance specs of the new PPC 970 (G5)
Wow! Thats pretty good performance. Any word on the price yet? [img]images/icons/tongue.gif[/img]
__________________
Audio Engineer/Musician/Producer |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Recording Slower than actual Performance | teddy57 | macOS | 2 | 07-07-2011 07:38 PM |
Need some actual help please... | The Tao Of Chris | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 2 | 05-24-2011 02:50 PM |
Pro Tools HD 8 with UAD 1 Cards actual performance? | STL Audio | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 5 | 07-29-2010 01:13 AM |
Optimum System Performance Specs | Keith Moore | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 0 | 03-14-2006 12:49 PM |
Help with System Specs and Performance/ 002 | powerjoe | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 7 | 12-11-2004 06:54 PM |