Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-22-2003, 11:23 AM
Park Seward's Avatar
Park Seward Park Seward is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Grants Pass, OR
Posts: 4,284
Default Actual performance specs of the new PPC 970 (G5)

From:
http://www.macbidouille.com/niouzcon...ate=2003-05-05

The first benchmarks were done during March 2003 on a preview model running at 1.4 GHz. OS was an alpha version 7B5 and 7B8 of Panther, optimised for 64 bits processor, but the applications tested were only using 32 bits.

Photoshop : PPC 970 mono 1.4 is 87% faster than a Dual 1.42 GHz
Final Cut Pro : PPC 970 mono 1.4 is 112% faster than a Dual 1.42 GHz
Alias|Wavefront Maya Render : PPC 970 mono 1.4 is 254% faster than a Dual 1.42 GHz

The Altivec shows a 80% increase of performances with the 970. This is not due to the chip itself, but to the high speed access between processor and central memory. The Mach 64 motherboard is highly optimised for the use of DDR-SDRAM.
- There is no performance loss when the PPC 970 executes some 32 bits apps.
- The motherboard optimization almost allows dual processors to reach double performance. In fact it's about 90% efficiency gained with the second processor, compared to 50% for the G4.
__________________
Park
The Transfer Lab at Video Park
Analog tape to Pro Tools transfers, 1/4"-2"
http://www.videopark.com
MacPro 6 core 3.33 GHz, OS 10.12.1, 8 GB RAM, PT12.6.1, Focusrite Saffire Pro 40, PreSonus DigiMax, MC Control V3.5, dual displays,
Neumann U-47, Tab V76 mic pre, RCA 44BX and 77DX, MacBook Pro 9,1, 2.3 Mhz, i7, CBS Labs Audimax and Volumax.
Ampex 440B half-track and four-track, 351 tube full-track mono, MM-1100 16-track.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-22-2003, 11:42 AM
PMoshay PMoshay is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: NY / CT
Posts: 629
Default Re: Actual performance specs of the new PPC 970 (G5)

le' Sick!
i guess that they will have to re-code apps a bit to take advantage of the 64bit's. I wonder if that is a huge task?
The new question is.........
Is Digi working on it yet?
Lets hope so......
__________________
www.LiveFromDarylsHouse.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-23-2003, 02:26 AM
vonbleak101 vonbleak101 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,256
Default Re: Actual performance specs of the new PPC 970 (G5)

Wow! Thats pretty good performance. Any word on the price yet? [img]images/icons/tongue.gif[/img]
__________________
Audio Engineer/Musician/Producer
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Recording Slower than actual Performance teddy57 macOS 2 07-07-2011 07:38 PM
Need some actual help please... The Tao Of Chris 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 2 05-24-2011 02:50 PM
Pro Tools HD 8 with UAD 1 Cards actual performance? STL Audio Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 5 07-29-2010 01:13 AM
Optimum System Performance Specs Keith Moore Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 0 03-14-2006 12:49 PM
Help with System Specs and Performance/ 002 powerjoe 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 7 12-11-2004 06:54 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:59 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com