|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
UAD test results Part II
Running 1.07 vst2rtas 3.6 uad LE6.4 OSX.3.5
Im starting to test this setup with buffer settings 1024 minimuim and 85 % cpu Man Im still hitting some walls here in 48K 24 bit But over all the system just felt more stable I had at least 26 delay comps and had my 2 x uad 's at 50 % - 60 % before errors still would like to see the 2 cards working more but If i used no delay comps I got 75 % so I will try a session using One delay comp on a buss where all non Uad tracks will be fed Ill report back Im sure Im not the only who noticed performance is increasing |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: UAD test results Part II
ok I lowered my buffer to 128 as It let me run the session when It wouldnt run at 1024
Ok 21 tracks Delay compensation method was 1 buss with delay comp for all non uad processed tracks 6 delay comps used all together , the other five from uad processed tracks that had less uad plugins than the highest one . pretty cool here's what I got ( I used Bf76 instead of 1176LN I reccomend this for better performance ) naitive - 6 antares tube 1 mic modeller 1 d verb 6 bf76 UAd 1 - 6 pultec pro 1 Precision limiter 2 real verb pro 4 1176 SE 4 EX-1 UAD - 1 meter says 85 % roughly |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: UAD test results Part II
Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: UAD test results Part II
merisblue:
i'll try that and see what happens. i'm having some funny stuff happen with nudging audio tracks to account for UAD latency. can i contact you outside of the DUC about this? i don't get the sense that many folks here are interested in this topic. you can email me - check my profile.
__________________
Asteroids do not concern me. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: UAD test results Part II
I must say screen animation was slow But audio was fine
Though A tip for uad users If you get a freaked out native cpu save press space bar and revert to saved clears it up a lot And I have a single processor g4 and a 001 and I think 002 dual processor g4 / g5 users will have significantly better performance ( obviously DUH ) |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: UAD test results Part II
can you test the real-world latency, too? i mean, set up a vocal track, insert UAD reverb into the vocal track, then sing to the mic and monitor yourself - do you FEEL the monitoring is delayed, or do you FEEL there's no difference compared to monitoring in analog domain?
this information would be most valuable to me. i currently use 256 hardware buffer and can provide monitor mixes with latency being a non-issue. if the uad can be added to the system without introducing too much latency, that'd be a killer.
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: UAD test results Part II
There is no point
you defiantly hear a delay In fact 2 x what your buffer setting is no way around it even with ADC I believe |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: UAD test results Part II
alright, so in my point of view (i do live gigs) the uad is full of crap
seriously... if i didn't have to be able to maintain realtime, i'd probably have already bought one. seems very nice. please post few mixes you have done with it
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: UAD test results Part II
http://duc.digidesign.com/showflat.p...=665805&Forum=,,,,,you were involved in this link
THese plugins are great full of crap I think not For live buy the actual GEAR |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Re: UAD test results Part II
yes, that's what i heard about the early experiences - and what you just stated few posts ago would indicate that the situation has not changed. not that i had high hopes about it, but anyway.
it's nice that you confirmed that uad will not work realtime and cannot be used live, so i don't have to wonder anymore
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
15" Powerbook test results | matts9383 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 8 | 04-10-2010 10:36 PM |
The Test Results are In!!! | dougied | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 3 | 03-03-2008 09:05 PM |
results of my davec test. | macr0w | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 2 | 03-14-2004 08:51 AM |
Why am I getting bad results on davec test? | Matt Whritenour | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 6 | 08-26-2003 06:31 AM |
P 4`s Results on the dave_c test | EDurney | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 6 | 05-23-2002 02:55 AM |