|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Re: MacBook Pro M1 MAX - Pro Tools Performance?
For example, like... many users have reported that Kontakt crashes PT while trying to load first library, so for those users Kontakt VI track count is zero.
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MacBook Pro M1 MAX - Pro Tools Performance?
Quote:
My bad if I didn't directly say that. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Re: MacBook Pro M1 MAX - Pro Tools Performance?
But I did. Currently it is software that is limiting mixing possibilities and performance, not hardware.
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MacBook Pro M1 MAX - Pro Tools Performance?
Quote:
To quote Fargo "If I am getting bank interest, I want complete security. Heck, FDIC. I don't see nothing like that here." |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Re: MacBook Pro M1 MAX - Pro Tools Performance?
Why do you need PRO/MAX hardware to confirm that certain plugins behave badly or do not work at all?
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MacBook Pro M1 MAX - Pro Tools Performance?
Quote:
MBP M1 MAX with Pro Tools for mixing, what is the CPU % lost by running under Rosetta 2 vs native? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MacBook Pro M1 MAX - Pro Tools Performance?
If you've got a session you want me to try, I can compare:
Mac Pro 7.1 16-core 48GB on 10.15.7 with 16" MBP M1 Max 10/32 with 64GB on 12.0.1 I have RME Babyface and Avid Carbon. PT Std and PT Ultimate So far in my PT tests, they both run about the same, but something (probably Monterey) fouls up the Avid Complete Bundle plugins, and I've had to take them all out. I'm using PT 2021.10 on both but can try 2021.3 or .7 if you prefer. You can't calculate the loss of Rosetta vs Native for PT, because you can only run under Rosetta on M1. And you can only run as Intel native on Intel. Logic (which is of course native on the M1 Max) runs about the same number of channels at minimum buffer size on both platforms. Dominic |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Re: MacBook Pro M1 MAX - Pro Tools Performance?
Quote:
My point was if you need badly behaving plugin, or one that crashes PT entirely, your system's real world performance sucks in mixing.
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Re: MacBook Pro M1 MAX - Pro Tools Performance?
Do you have native build of PT software and required plugins? That is the real question, performance on Rosetta vs Native.
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MacBook Pro M1 MAX - Pro Tools Performance?
As you say (and I've edited my post) - no one knows. It isn't possible to compare.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Macbook Pro 13" vs. iMac Pro |*Pro Tools Performance | Meads | macOS | 0 | 11-14-2019 11:51 AM |
MacBook Pro i9 throttling and performance | Guitarman002 | macOS | 42 | 02-01-2019 11:20 AM |
Macbook 12" + Pro Tools 11. What performance can I expect? | tobbenos | macOS | 4 | 07-15-2017 04:21 PM |
Performance of Macbook (Pro) | rmccam | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 0 | 07-19-2007 10:05 AM |
macbook performance | Bologma | Pro Tools M-Powered (Mac) | 12 | 04-16-2007 09:16 AM |