Poor performance explained!

[tomhartman]

Originally Posted by alexthemusicbloke

I think I would rather have a machine which performs consistently than being able to reach the maximum number of plugins under the right circumstances.

The efficiency cores are there for a reason, you use them to run secondary tasks to keep the important processes running smoothly. Avid have gone with the right approach IMO.


Reaper... it's a superb piece of software and I'm a big fan, but it is absolutely not a reliable mixing tool in the same way PT is. Great it can run so many plugins, but I can't get to the end of a complex mix without encountering a mountain of bugs, instabilities and unpredictable behaviour once the session gets big.

Yeah and forget Eucon with it...that program is like a really bad looking erector set. I don't care if it can stand on its head lol