|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Finding fizz and removing it with EQ
Be aware that your fizz may change frequency depending on what note you are playing.
__________________
HP Z2 Xeon 6 Core, Blackmagic Decklink HD Extreme 3D Win10, PT ver.. Latest |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Finding fizz and removing it with EQ
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Finding fizz and removing it with EQ
I had a similar problem in the studio at the weekend, and I don't have the expansion pack (so no parametric EQ). There was a remarkably simple solution...I used the tone control on my guitar :) Seriously, I normally leave it at full (and I've not touched a tone control on any of my guitars, ever), but just rolling it back a bit removed all the fizz and nastiness.
In a similar vein...you could try putting your EQ before the amp instead of after. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Finding fizz and removing it with EQ
Quote:
oh by the way, my guitar doesn't have a tone control! |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Finding fizz and removing it with EQ
There will ALWAYS be fizz in any heavy guitar tone, thats just a fact. Now whether or not its in an annoying frequency is another thing, or whether its audible under normal situations to average listeners is another thing.
There is fizz in the guitar sound of every metal band I've ever heard, and I'm talking commercial releases. Soulfly, Meshuggah, Lamb Of God, Devil Driver, Cannibal Corpse, Slayer, Machine Head, Slipknot, Mudvayne, WhiteChapel, Job For A Cowboy, Korn, In Flames, Killswitch Engage.... and on and on..... but the fizz is so lost in the mix, its either not noticeable or completely inaudible to most people in most situations. But listen to the raw guitar tracks, and you will hear it, its not overpowering, but it is there. The annoying fizz, IF it is pronounced, can usually be dialed out with a Peaking EQ with a tight Q and dropped, usually around 3k to 7k sometimes higher, sometimes lower, in my experience. I prefer a Peaking filter to a notch filter because the notch bandwith is usually too tight and it will eliminate a certain freq. but with that freq. gone, you will now hear the nearby freqs. much more clearly and then you have to notch those out. Really, you should not be having that much fizz. If you do, as I said before, the GAIN is the first thing to check. You will always have some fizz. This is not a problem because once in the mix, it will be inaudible. You may hear a really distorted tone that sounds like it has no fizz, but with careful listening and a trained ear, you will be able to hear it. Another thing you can do is place a chorus after the amp with a really low setting, this adds width to the sound and because of the dispersal, its much harder to hear the fizz. Another thing is using a De-Esser plugin. BUT, above all - revisit your Gain and treble settings. If you find you are having to really boost the treble to get the sound you want, it would probably be more advantageous to instead CUT some bass and mid, which will allow the treble to be more clearly heard without tons of dB of gain in the highs. When the 11R first came out all we had was the G-EQ, so it was very difficult to get the sound right, but with the P-EQ its very easy to make precise cuts and boosts. Maybe you can post a sample of your rig and let use hear what you are talking about, and even better, post the rig setting so we can hear it on our rigs and suggest changes.
__________________
Brian Windows 11 Pro | macOS 12 Pro Tools 2022 benonistudio.com Youtube Channel - benonistudio Plugin Deals @benonistudio |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Finding fizz and removing it with EQ
Quote:
I was actually done with the topic so I saw your reply way too late, sorry. and about the fizz, I guess I'm sort of figuring out how to cut out disturbing frequencies and I too actually noticed there is always fizz in the sound, even in the commercial records just as you said. I think I'm now more accurate with parametric EQ than before, so I think I'm getting better results. I'll put here a test record which is only 20 secs long, so you can listen to and give me further advices(if you care to ) http://soundcloud.com/dnbilgili/4-1 [gp6 drums ] |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Finding fizz and removing it with EQ
Would be fun to hear the track "undefizzed".
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Finding fizz and removing it with EQ
oh, you're right but looks like I lost the session file so I can't really let you A/B it. I'll see if I can make another short record with fizz in it and without.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Finding fizz and removing it with EQ
I have had extensive use of my 11 rack now for nearly 2 years and I have come to the conclusion that what makes the difference between it sounding fantastic and sounding horrible (with that typical modelling sounding crispyness) is dependent on how the true Z is manually set.
For my guitar (time machine '56 Strat) it sounds best at the lowest setting. On auto (which defaults to 1M, highest setting without any stompbox models) it sounds bright and plasticky to me. The lowest setting results in slightly less gain from the amp models, but considerably less harsh top end - more vintagey to my ears, which is what I'm after. I even prefer it when using high-gain amp models (although I'm not an afficionado on high-gain/modern sounds). The tips mentioned in this thread are very useful, especially the LP filter trick, but try experimenting with the True Z. It makes a lot of difference, especially if you are after a classic kind of guitar tone from the 11 rack.
__________________
MojoBat Productions |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The fizz that wasn't really there | Deny | Eleven Rack | 2 | 08-13-2011 02:58 PM |
Weird fizz making sound when Re-Amping | JustGoWithIt | Eleven Rack | 6 | 08-03-2011 07:11 AM |
11r Standalone XLR Noise/fizz, hum | fly_with_v | Eleven Rack | 4 | 12-13-2010 10:04 AM |
getting rid of fizz/noise | SloeGin | Eleven Rack | 3 | 11-14-2010 02:00 AM |
fault finding by removing plug-ins... | AdamPT8 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 4 | 05-17-2010 11:03 AM |