|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Does Boom Realy suck this bad?
Quote:
Videos here... http://airvirtualinstruments.blogspo...nd-tricks.html http://airvirtualinstruments.blogspo...e-she-was.html http://airvirtualinstruments.blogspo...o-to-midi.html
__________________
I work with amazing people who do incredible things. Founder of the Expert Sites. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Does Boom Realy suck this bad?
Hey RussUK, Thanks for all of your work and dedication to the Air Blog!
I don't mean to bag on Boom, cause like I said, I LOVE the way it sounds...and no matter what, it'll stay in my Tool Box...but you've got to understand me when I cry like a baby about not having individual outputs on this Beautiful VI. I simply desire to use it as a Main Staple in my productions, but to be completely honest, I think I'm just gonna sample it and make my own custom patches to use in Structure (Full Version) cause I'm so used to individual outputs since I'm a Reason User and Structure User. I do really like your trick about panning those mono tracks Right and Left and then Print Two Tracks at once...and I recommend to everyone to watch RussUK's Video's for Tips and Tricks... and on a final note, if I may make a request to Digi and AIR,...If you do make an update to Boom (and I do Love Expand!2, very much), then could you make the individual outputs the main priority, even before adding new Kits, or the ability to use your own samples. Thank You Kindly. Electric Nick
__________________
Asus P8P67 Pro 3.1 / Intel i7 2600K / GSkill 2x4GB 1600 / Win 7 Pro 64bit / PTLE 8.0.5 / Digi 002R / Reason 6 / Akai MPK61 / KRK V8's / Rane TTM56 / Technics 1200 mk5 / and Stacks of Wax! |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Does Boom Realy suck this bad?
It's 2009 and having to jump through hoops to get Individual tracks is a huge over sight!!
I've been trying to get a few clients into using Boom but the first thing they always want is to add a Plug to the kick or a synced Delay to a hand clap. I've been Directed to Izotopes iDrum in other posts but haven't jumped on board I know you can load your own samples but don't know about individual outs!!!
__________________
The Greatest Risk in Life is Doing Nothing |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Does Boom Realy suck this bad?
Quote:
__________________
I work with amazing people who do incredible things. Founder of the Expert Sites. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Does Boom Realy suck this bad?
Russ I watched your video and all it did was prove my point that this tool needs improvement. I love Pt just as much as you or anyone else on this forum, but isn't this a place where we can be honest. This tool in it's current state has many limitations that it really should not have in 2009 PT 8.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Does Boom Realy suck this bad?
I need to hear things in real time Not Printed!!!
I can't wait to Print then reprint when they change a groove then reprint when they want to use another kick sample Sometimes the effects are part of the groove and need to be heard as it's created You have to admit boom would be a whole lot more useful if it had individual outs!!!!! it is what it is It should be called Fizzle not boom!!!!!
__________________
The Greatest Risk in Life is Doing Nothing |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Does Boom Realy suck this bad?
Quote:
If the question is now 'could Boom be improved' the answer is of course yes, as I've said a million times so could my iPhone, Mac, kettle, watch etc. ad infinity. If you haven't got time (wow what a stressful life!) to print a track, then instantiate it twice. Should you have to do this? Perhaps not. Sh*t happens, get over it.
__________________
I work with amazing people who do incredible things. Founder of the Expert Sites. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Does Boom Realy suck this bad?
Russ... Don't take it personal or get your feelings hurt. Just get with the times . The tool is a toy not comparable with ultrabeat or Redrum and I hate logic. All I'm asking for is a tool I can actually use with a decent work flow... don't get your nickers in a bunch.
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Does Boom Realy suck this bad?
I respect both opinions reguarding Boom. I don't think it's as bad as the original poster thinks it is, and I'm not as positive to it as RussUK.
Some more samples per kit, fx and individual outputs and I'll be happy. Maby this should be posted on the apreciation page, but I have to give RussUK credit for being a positive person looking for solutions rather than being a negative person looking for limitations like many of us other posters here do. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Does Boom Realy suck this bad?
Quote:
Get with the times listen here http://airvirtualinstruments.blogspo...hind-blog.html and then you'll realise that some of us have been with the times for several decades, as someone who paid several thousand pounds for a 2 track editor and a thousand pounds for a drum machine, I just count my blessing that I can now make money out of FREE gear. I suggest that as you've recently joined the community you do a few searches on this question alone and see the exhaustive discussions that have already taken place. Search is your friend and will help you avoid circular conversations and re-inventing thread wheels.
__________________
I work with amazing people who do incredible things. Founder of the Expert Sites. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
any other realy happy pro tools le user | darkdream | General Discussion | 7 | 07-16-2010 08:46 PM |
Realy usefull feature. PLEASE!!!! | Ppaudio | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 1 | 10-18-2006 07:09 AM |
HD realy that good? | fabpab | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 21 | 04-08-2005 09:51 PM |
HD? realy that good? | fabpab | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 2 | 04-02-2005 04:47 AM |
001, Magma, Firewire - does it realy work? | melodious thunk | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 4 | 02-05-2001 07:32 AM |