|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pro Tools 9 Hardware Insert Delay Compensation with Lynx AES16e and Aurora 16
If anyone is interested, I was able able to run the tests and determine the round trip latency of Pro Tools 9 with the AES16e card and an Aurora 16. Here are my results.
If anyone might have anything to add, or refute, please let me know. I am certainly no scientist or math major. Otherwise, I will be plugging these numbers into the Hardware Insert Delay settings of the IO section to compensate appropriately for the delay incurred by the Lynx hardware when using external Hardware Effects (Hardware Inserts). At 44.1k - 29 Samples - 0.66ms At 48k - 29 Samples - 0.60ms At 88.2k - 22 Samples - 0.25ms At 96k - 22 Samples - 0.23ms * These figures were computed by following the instructions in the Pro Tools User Guide (Page 963) * The number of Samples divided by the Sample Rate = Milliseconds Example: At 44.1k - 29 Samples divided by 44.1 = .66ms |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Switching from HD Native to Lynx AES16e ? | jacko | macOS | 0 | 01-10-2013 02:22 PM |
lynx aes16e and aurora? | Alexmc1988 | macOS | 0 | 04-27-2011 08:22 AM |
can't get lynx aes16e to work with more than two converters on pro tools 9 | brett_ooo | macOS | 1 | 02-23-2011 04:27 PM |
PT9 / LYNX AES16e - Loud noise when changing outputs | geelo | Pro Tools 9 | 0 | 01-16-2011 12:05 PM |
Hardware insert delay question - Aurora | freedomof81 | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 4 | 01-26-2010 11:10 PM |