|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ADC in PTLE - a few questions
So I'm reading up on Auto delay comp, and was wondering if my mixes are sounding less than what they could be....
I'm applying various VST plug ins via an RTAS adapter, and also the DUY everpack plugs, PSP vintage warmer, massey tape head and delay, and some others... Most of my plugs are inserted directly on tracks, some on busses, and others via an aux track receiving an aux send from an audio track. Each of these plugs will have some latency, I'm sure (I'll go about checking it soon enough.) If I do not manually correct these, is the cumulative effect of all the sample latencies causing smeared audio? If it's not noticeably affecting the timing of my tracks should I still worry about it? thanks |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: ADC in PTLE - a few questions
Manually correcting takes almost no time. Just set a time adjuster to the number of seconds you need to add and then option-drag copies to each track. You can create presets for your most common values.
__________________
Bob's room 615 562-4346 Interview Artists are the gatekeepers of truth! - Paul Robeson |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ADC in PTLE - a few questions
The answer is: Possibly. If you're hearing it, it needs to be fixed. If you're not noticing it, I suppose it's not a problem, eh?
CTRL-CLICK on the volume readout of the track (where it says "vol",) and cycle thru till it says "dly." This is the total amount of delay in samples that is being reported to Pro Tools by all plugins you are using on that track. Simply highlight the region(s) in the edit window and press ALT-H and nudge the region(s) forward that amount of samples and you're good (I make a note in the comments section of the number of samples I've nudged a particular track.) Other workflows can be applied for plugins on parallel auxes, but that's the basic gist of it. The only time you'll experience phase smearing is if you're using plugins on multiple mic'd sources (like, say, drum overheads and not on the room mic(s)) or if you're using parallel auxes or hardware inserts. To me and many others, lack of ADC is basically a non-issue. In fact, most engineers I know who use HD prefer to compensate for the delays manually as opposed to relying on the buggy delay compensation built in to HD. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ADC in PTLE - a few questions
Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ADC in PTLE - a few questions
Watch these videos by Peeder:
These will show you how to determine the true latency and how to compensate for it http://www.screencast.com/users/peed...ders/tutorials
__________________
MacPro3ghz, 6GB, 10.7.5, PT10.3.2, Digi002 factory/toolkit2/PTIEP, 11R |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: ADC in PTLE - a few questions
To me, it's less about plug-ins (although it would be good to have) because you can choose from so many "no latency" versions but when patching outboard gear into a mix It's a constant pain to keep things straight. You sometimes have to print the incoming signal and align it to get it right, and every subtle change brings a new problem with it. There are some plug-ins that induce latency that would serve us better if we did not have to be districted by the issue.
__________________
~ tom thomas Formerly hobotom Pro Tools Ultimate 2024 HDX Hybrid HD Omni and 192 I/Os Windows 10 Intel Hexcore i7 All Samsung Pro SSDs Ampex MM1200 2" 24 trk tape Outboard: UREI, Eventide, Lexicon, Yamaha, TC Electronics, Orban, ART, EchoAudio, Dolby, Hughes, API, Neve, Audio Arts, BBE, Aphex, Berringer, MOTU, dbx, Allison, etc. Plug-ins: Too many to talk about. www.metrostudios.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ADC in PTLE - a few questions
SF Audio,
I think it would be worth your time to see how one of your mixes sounds when you have corrected the delay. Some people are more sensitive to it than others and if you have never heard one of your mixes without the correction, you may not know what to listen for (maybe you do). Just to give you an example: I use plug-ins on drum tracks that induce 0 to 81 samples of latency depending on the track. When I record drums, I usually use 10-12 mics each going to their own track. The drum kit won't sound terrible without correction, but it sounds a lot better when I correct for the plug-in latency. Just to be clear, some of the DigiRack plug-ins do create latency so you are not "safe" if you only use them. Also, plug-in latency can be so small that you won't experience "timing" issues but you may very well be getting some phasing. Hope this helps, Greg
__________________
Intel i7 3930K, Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 (rev 1.0), 32 GB Corsair Vengeance 1600 ram, EVGA Nvidea GT 720 TI video card, a Samsung 850 Pro (256 GB) OS drive, 2 Samsung 850 Pro's (512 GB) in externally mounted drive bays for session and sample storage, Win 10 Pro, PT Ultimate (Native)2019.10, HD Omni, HD I/O 16x16 . |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PTLE 7.3 questions. | O_O | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 3 | 06-20-2007 08:10 PM |
Questions about PTLE | lebspec | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 2 | 12-26-2003 03:45 PM |
PTLE Mac -> PTLE Windows conversion questions | jskaroff | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 6 | 07-09-2003 03:36 PM |
PTLE Mac -> PTLE Windows conversion questions | jskaroff | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 1 | 06-19-2003 09:10 AM |
Battery/PTLE questions | guitaramundo | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 0 | 12-12-2002 07:11 PM |