Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-03-2009, 07:00 PM
Xollop Xollop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 45
Default Film Sound Designers, How is PT8?

I'm considering upgrading to PTLE8 eventually, but I'm unsure about making the change. It might be an inevitability as PTLE 7.4.2 isn't even starting up properly under the new Snow Leopard regime I'm running.
I primarily use ProTools for sound design, foley, editing mixing etc for Film and Video. Although LE is incredibly limited compared to Logic or SDTK Pro as far as it's ability to work with video or surround sound (unless you fork out a ridiculous amount of money), I still prefer the editing environment and the up-until-recent stability of the software.
Point I'm getting at, how is Protools LE 8 working for those of you that are working with Video and sound design? Better than 7?
thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-04-2009, 12:35 AM
tamasdragon tamasdragon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hungary
Posts: 2,190
Default Re: Film Sound Designers, How is PT8?

Consider that snow leopard is not even supported yet by digidesign.
10.5.8 is qualified by digi.
Tamas Dragon
__________________
my blog:Tamas Dragon
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-04-2009, 07:29 AM
Xollop Xollop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 45
Default Re: Film Sound Designers, How is PT8?

I'm well aware. Doesn't quite address my question.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-04-2009, 08:45 AM
ns10 ns10 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 18
Default Re: Film Sound Designers, How is PT8?

Hi
I recently graduated from a music tech course. Many moons ago I used to work on an AMS Audiofile in post production.
All modern DAW's give one too many options at times but overall we are now in the land of milk and honey.
I used PT8 for my finals, a film project, TV add's and idents. PT8 finally offers a load of decent plugins as part of the package and midi editing is slick. Elastic time offers all sorts of abuse opportunities for fresh sound design ideas.
Get stuck in.
However as mentioned by another user PT doesn't have it's Snow shoes yet so watch out for that.
Have fun
__________________
ns10m
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-04-2009, 08:49 AM
Ian Palmer Ian Palmer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 141
Default Re: Film Sound Designers, How is PT8?

I am in the camp that lets other people test the waters with new software first. I work with 7.3 HD on OSX 10.4.9 as it's perfectly stable. As it's HD it would cost a lost of money to upgrade (all the plugins too etc) so my company plays it safe in not upgrading often. It is good practice to let these systems settle down and all the problems fixed before parting with large amounts of cash. The common mistake people make too is upgrading OS or PT and use it in conjunction with software that isn't supported by Digi, then moan it's not working.
__________________
Ian Palmer
Sound Designer & Dubbing Mixer
@ianpalmersound

Website
IMDB

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-04-2009, 09:02 AM
docbop docbop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 403
Default Re: Film Sound Designers, How is PT8?

You'd probably get more response if you posted it in the Post and Surround area of the DUC.

Why are you even interesting in jumping to SL if you have stable systems. Production environments I've worked in we didn't moved to new systems till we had good reason to and even then only after evaluation on a test system.

People are wanting to jump to SL, but what is the driving reason other than its new. What is SL fixing that makes it so necessary to jump before letting it prove itself. IMO there are some pretty significant architectural changes I want to see how stable they are before moving over.
__________________
Steve B.
----------------------------------------------------------------
If you think you can or if you think you can't, you're right.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-04-2009, 09:03 AM
Xollop Xollop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 45
Default Re: Film Sound Designers, How is PT8?

Thanks NS10, I'm in the same boat, just graduating from MICA with a BFA in Video (Sound specialization).
I'm running a 4 year old MBP with some self upgraded parts (ram, hard-drive etc) and while I keep my computers immaculate, it was showing it's age. The benefit of upgrading to Snow Leopard was worth sacrificing temporary compatibility with Protools as everything else in the system runs better and I use Ableton Live 8 over Protools for music use anyway. I'm not complaining specifically that Digidesign was/is not ready with updates for all there Protools, I was well aware of the possible consequences. Just a simple question about how protools 8 is for film use...
Not to mention if I was running a Protools HD set up I wouldn't be on this forum worrying about LE's lack of video support standard...Protools HD looks like a dream.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-04-2009, 09:34 AM
Xollop Xollop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 45
Default Re: Film Sound Designers, How is PT8?

Docbop, I didn't see those other forums, so thanks for the heads up.

I guess to put this thing at rest, as it could go on indefinitely. YES, the most logical thing to do, in order to not jeopardize ProTools, would have been to stick with Tiger and continue working. The key thing here though, is that in MY case I'm talking about a personal computer, not part of a studio, and I'm certainly getting bugger-all new projects to work on. Again, 1st Gen MBP...mbox2pro, and as Protools is one out of many different video/sound softs I use, I prefer having all of those run better in the mean time. That's it. Had zero intention about this turning into a Snow Leopard thread, I get the feeling that people like to moan about it not working, and moan about the people moaning about it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hybrid Library for Freelance Sound Designers dforshee Post - Surround - Video 5 07-17-2016 12:19 AM
Re-Recording Mixers vs Sound Designers dr sound Post - Surround - Video 3 04-02-2014 09:36 AM
Testers/sound designers for new RTAS synth plugin kv331 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 48 01-07-2005 12:29 PM
question for sound designers for web sites... Felix General Discussion 5 05-14-2002 07:14 AM
Sound For Film ReniuR Tips & Tricks 1 06-27-2001 12:16 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:50 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com