|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Low Latency Monitoring in Studio
Quote:
__________________
Mac Mini M1 | Mac OS 12.6.1 Monterey | Avid Carbon + 2x Carbon Pre | Pro Tools Studio 2024.3 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Low Latency Monitoring in Studio
The dual buffer operation has never been written up cleanly by Avid. It really needed a good white paper as well as clear mention in the Pro Tools reference Guide. There are some DUC posts, articles and videos floating around, but not one authoritative clear document. Which is a pity, and super-weird, they could have made more of it and could have avoided a lot of confusion. If it was up to me I sure would be explaining core important stuff like this in documentation and also maybe putting hints in the UI what is happening instead of wasting resources making stuff like Pro Tools First, Avid Link, and other junk.
You will have to search the forums, as I mentioned a lot of discussion in the past around a decade ago. Google search will find it all with a site:duc.avid.com qualifier. Best posts were by likely by user "Bharath", a super helpful Avid Engineering manager before he bailed and joined Apple. Start here. https://duc.avid.com/showthread.php?t=362981 |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Low Latency Monitoring in Studio
Thank you so much Darryl!
__________________
Mac Mini M1 | Mac OS 12.6.1 Monterey | Avid Carbon + 2x Carbon Pre | Pro Tools Studio 2024.3 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Low Latency Monitoring in Studio
The best thing about this feature is that I don't really think about it. Just set your record buffer as low as you can and forget low latency monitoring, if you have a decent computer. We should be concentrating on making quality audio and not this sort of thing.
__________________
Mac Mini M1 16 GB OS 12.7.4 PT 2024.3.1 |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Low Latency Monitoring in Studio
Quote:
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Low Latency Monitoring in Studio
Quote:
If they can deal with the high latency you can just have them monitor through PT. I find that's fine for guitars and amp sims, but not for vocals, unless the vocalist is not picky and okay with the weird comb filtering that gets a lot worse after 2ms. At 64 buffer you're looking at 4-5ms with Lynx at 48kHz. Fine for guitars and drums, but really bad for vocal tracking. I use a hybrid approach with LLM enabled and persistent sends used for FX and also for amp sims. Here's what I mean - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSanfXdpNyI |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Low Latency Monitoring in Studio
Although I guess this only matters if you are running close to the limit on your system?
__________________
Mac Mini M1 16 GB OS 12.7.4 PT 2024.3.1 |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Low Latency Monitoring in Studio
Quote:
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Monitoring through headphones with Apollo 8 - when selecting Low Latency Monitoring | Mick335 | Pro Tools 12 | 2 | 04-10-2018 08:34 AM |
9.0.3 Low Latency Monitoring | 440Hz | macOS | 3 | 07-21-2011 07:19 PM |
lowest latency without "low latency monitoring" ? | music project | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 6 | 05-11-2010 08:40 AM |
Latency Monitoring | sweetbabysims | Virtual Instruments | 1 | 11-21-2007 01:22 PM |
low latency monitoring in 7.3?? | avamark | Tips & Tricks | 4 | 12-23-2006 02:12 PM |