|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Increasing length of session makes Pro Tools lag?
Hi! Been an avid lurker on these forums for some time, and this is my first post and question.
I am working on a track that has a lot of MIDI/VI's, over 25 or more including drums. Also I have around 5 tracks that are Mono Audio tracks. I started out building up each section of the song, about 4 in total. Yesterday I went to arrange it properly and structure the song, so it starts with an intro, then verse parts and chorus parts etc.. The thing is: I had no lag issues before I started copying sections and making the session longer. When each section had just one instance (one verse part, one chorus part), everything was playing smoothly, but as soon as I duplicated them (two verse parts and three chorus parts), my session became laggy, audio crackles constantly, and theres a delay when pressing play. Does anyone here have any experience with this problem? Why is session length more taxing on my computer than number of VI's? Because I didn't add any new instruments when I started structuring the song, I just duplicated midi data. And is there any way to mitigate these performance issues? I have 16 Gbs of RAM, an intel i7 5820 @4.2 Ghz, latest Windows 10 update, running latest Pro Tools I think, 2021.6. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Length of MIDI notes makes no sense | SOY | Pro Tools 11 | 5 | 03-06-2018 01:21 PM |
Session Length Pro Tools First 12.8 | vabascal | Pro Tools | Intro Discussion | 1 | 08-17-2017 11:28 AM |
Session File size increasing 50mb and crashing | cunninghamaudio | macOS | 0 | 02-28-2017 05:30 PM |
11.2.1.203 - Session save copy makes new files | Farmer Dave | Pro Tools 11 | 9 | 08-19-2014 03:15 PM |
Increasing performance by increasing internal mem | elv1s1sal1ve | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 2 | 06-18-2006 09:23 AM |