|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools sticky performance.
Quote:
Do I need to remove the settings folders too? I noticed that there is the Avid folder, AND the digidesign folder. Do I need to remove the plugs from both folders? Also, when I put them back, I just drag and drop them in the correct spots, and that's it? |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools sticky performance.
Quote:
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools sticky performance.
Oh, crap, you sure did.. Thanks again, Darryl.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools sticky performance.
Ok, so tried it, and everything ran much more smooth. No issues during recording 8 tracks simultaneously either. SCRATCH THAT, there are issues even like this.
Now, I tried switching the resolution for more real estate (next size up), and then I got the lagging meters during record, BUT, only when zoomed in on the edit window. If I zoomed out mega far in the edit window, then it didn't happen. Now, another thing I noticed was the read out of "Requires High Perf GPU" in activity monitor said "No" for Pro Tools, which I would've figured Pro Tools needed the high performance GPU. Is that normal? Also, I remember coming across some threads back in November when I got this talking about disabling App Nap. Should this be done, or does it matter? I know the only way to do so is through Terminal. Any way, these are my findings so far. Last edited by Thenewexhibit; 02-14-2015 at 01:41 PM. Reason: New Conclusion |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools sticky performance.
app nap won't affect Pro Tools as it is in the foreground and busy and just will not nap. The only things disabling app nap is useful for are background processes that are not doing much but still need to have low response latency... Like the EUCON software.
I would pursue plugin troubleshooting. Put third party plugs back in batches and see what happens. Take your time. Since some of these plugins are also instantiated when you put them back in the folder you should try disabling them from Pro Tools and see if they cause problems just being installed or if they need to be active. Ideally just remove those plugins from the insert. Those denormalization problems that cause cpu burn/spikes with some plugins won't happen for a plugin in the folder but not used in an insert. And of course it may not be a plugin that is really bad, it might be done thing else wrong that just needs s little CPU load to trip up. You do have GPU switching in the energy settings in the System preferences disabled right? I don't have a similar Mac here, maybe Chris could check what his Mac shows for Pro Tools GPU usage (link to instructions in one of my earlier posts). |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools sticky performance.
Quote:
Thanks again. I will start some more testing. I do have Automatic Graphics switching unchecked, however, I didn't realize that after I did the PRAM, that it put it back. I tested both ways, but no difference. Same kind of performance. I look at the activity monitor too, and the energy level of pro tools will be around the 70's area, ex. 70.3. Is this considered high? The energy level graph that reads left to right (blue color) goes pretty high when doing this stuff, and when I quit pro tools, just shoots back down pretty low. Is this normal? Also, I turned my cache up to 5 GB. Doesn't seem to change anything. It shows in the system usage window in PT that memory is at 41% (in orange), and Disk Cache is at 4% (in green). Seem normal? The session is only 1.36 GB, and was much lower before I started doing tests (i.e. Recording more audio etc.). Also, how do I post images on here? Computer illiterate over here.. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools sticky performance.
There we go. This shows the usage of PT when it was open (where it was before I quit) and after I quit PT. As you can see, the blue graph goes considerably down when that's closed. Normal?
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools sticky performance.
Ah yes, but I am not sure why you are looking at this.
Time to focus on plugins... |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools sticky performance.
Ok, so did another test.
I can replicate the sticky graphics depending on how zoomed in I am in the edit window. These tests were done with the the plugins folder removed, removing all the 3rd party plugs, and this test was also performed when closing all the plugs, wether active or not, that were in the session. It was also performed while adding just stock digi eq, and stock trim plugin. Sometimes across all channels, sometimes just on the 8 tracks that were recording simultaneously in all 5 first inserts, sometimes with no plugins instantiated anywhere. I did these tests by grouping my 8 channels and doing rapid fader movements in groups, or by holding control and doing single faders. Sometimes slow movements too, wether grouped, or using control to do just single faders. No change in these cases. Also, this stuff would be somewhat responsive (still not completely smooth) UNTIL the cursor played over the fader that I had my mouse clicked on and moving. After it moved past that fader I was moving, it went back to being considerably more smooth, but not what at least I expect. Once again, this was done with all 3rd party plugins removed, and with no plugins in the inserts, and sometimes with. No difference. Also ran into a 6106 error again. CPU problems. Am I missing anything in terms of testing my plugins? Thanks in advance, Darryl, and the rest of you. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools sticky performance.
Quote:
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pro Tools VIs and low latency performance - STICKY PLEASE! | alfaholic | Pro Tools 10 | 18 | 06-08-2012 12:03 PM |
11 r and Pro tools 9 Sticky | Grey | Eleven Rack | 0 | 11-22-2010 12:41 PM |
Pro-Tools on Mac iChatRoom - Sticky Req | KingFish | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 02-23-2009 03:12 PM |
Petition - Make PT Performance A Sticky - Plz Read | davec | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 29 | 12-02-2005 08:32 PM |
Petition - Make PT Performance A Sticky - Plz Read | davec | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 0 | 11-30-2005 03:21 PM |