Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Post Production > Post - Surround - Video
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-31-2010, 07:33 AM
tabmanmatt tabmanmatt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 23
Default regarding harddrives....

Hey everybody,

Right now my studio is using outboard SCSI drives connected directly to our Mac G5. These are our primary recording drives. I was wondering what other people are using these days. We are thinking(because obviously SCSIs are on the out) of starting to use Firewire. Have Firewires become fast enough to handle large Pro Tools sessions? Even sessions with video? We do a lot of sweetening to picture.

I know a lot of people just add another drive internally. But we need to have multiple drives, for backup, safety(peace of mind) purposes. Let me know what ya'll are using and what might be a good option going forward. Thanks!

--Matt
__________________
5th Floor Recording Co.
Milwaukee WI
www.5thfloorrecording.com

[email protected]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-31-2010, 07:51 AM
Gohanto Gohanto is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 48
Default Re: regarding harddrives....

You might find this helpful...
http://www.glyphtech.com/support/trackcount.php
Tests with several drives and several connection types.

And it's generally recommended that even if your hard drive is fast enough, you should still have your video files on a seperate hard drive from your audio.
__________________
Good sound starts in the script, not in post-production.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-31-2010, 09:21 AM
Roy Pahlman Roy Pahlman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca.
Posts: 169
Default Re: regarding harddrives....

Definitely different drives for your video and audio. I have had firewire bus problems with a G5 and large sessions. I would recommend Sata drives. I have had no problems with large track counts with these drives. I suspect the G5 firewire bus was my problem with errors. my 2 cents
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-31-2010, 09:22 AM
ggegan ggegan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Culver City, CA
Posts: 389
Default Re: regarding harddrives....

Firewire 400 and 800 drives with speeds of at least 7200 RPM are qualified for Pro Tools recording with some restrictions on the number of channels that can be recorded simultaneously.

Read the following Digidesign drive spec page:

http://www.digidesign.com/index.cfm?...4&itemid=23132

Look into eSATA and fiber drives. The speed is nearly as fast as internal SATA drives. I don't believe they have been tested by Digidesign, so they say they don't support them, but I know facilities that use them without any issues.

Here is an article that shows the speed difference between eSATA and Firewire 800:

http://macperformanceguide.com/Stora...-Firewire.html
__________________
Gary Gegan
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-01-2010, 07:40 PM
mikevarela mikevarela is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 571
Default Re: regarding harddrives....

wonder if eSATA might work, that way you could still stay external but maintain internal speeds.

Also, a company called DROBO makes a simple to use raid enclosure that uses a technology called iSCSI - i think over Ethernet. it's supposed to be really fast.

In any case, you're not going to realize speeds like you would internally due to added bus architecture. each stage adds latency.

SCSI worked great because you could run 10,00 rpm drives.

You could also, if you have a mac pro, raid 0 two drives internally as a record volume, then backup immediately that data once you're done.
__________________
NuanceTone.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-01-2010, 08:03 PM
EarHole EarHole is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 876
Default Re: regarding harddrives....

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikevarela View Post
wonder if eSATA might work, that way you could still stay external but maintain internal speeds.

Also, a company called DROBO makes a simple to use raid enclosure that uses a technology called iSCSI - i think over Ethernet. it's supposed to be really fast.

In any case, you're not going to realize speeds like you would internally due to added bus architecture. each stage adds latency.

SCSI worked great because you could run 10,00 rpm drives.

You could also, if you have a mac pro, raid 0 two drives internally as a record volume, then backup immediately that data once you're done.

Beware the Drobo.... I had a good friend loose 4 TB's off files and when he called the tech support that he paid extra for... after two weeks of un-returned emails and calls, they shrugged their shoulders and said nothing.

He had all of the files backed up but still, going down like that on a new system is bogus.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-01-2010, 10:34 PM
reichman's Avatar
reichman reichman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: New York
Posts: 2,412
Default Re: regarding harddrives....

I'm very fond of MacGurus' systems: www.macgurus.com

I use their eSATA tower and it has worked well with Pro Tools. The difference between it and FW800 is noticeable.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-02-2010, 07:40 AM
kd_special kd_special is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 357
Default Re: regarding harddrives....

We use firewire drives only at our work as of PT 6. We run video off them too. If you want ultimate stability I suggest Lacie drives. They only cost a little more than a regular no Name PC extrenal firewaire drive but they work much much better. We use LAcie only now after the early years of testing with some PC external drives etc.

I run video off the same drive as my sessions and I usually dont have much of a problem. But some of our mix rooms have internal video drives to run video off of.

If you are going to build your own firewire drives be sure to make sure the external case uses an oxford chip. Or you will be in for a world of unstability.

kd
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-02-2010, 07:46 AM
infiniteloop infiniteloop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 436
Default Re: regarding harddrives....

Heh. LaCie drives have the worst rep i've ever known. No-one in London trusts them any more. I have two dead ones sitting under my desk. The power electrionics are terrible.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-05-2010, 04:52 AM
Postman Postman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: where land meets sky
Posts: 2,375
Default Re: regarding harddrives....

Quote:
Heh. LaCie drives have the worst rep i've ever known. No-one in London trusts them any more. I have two dead ones sitting under my desk. The power electrionics are terrible
My experience with LaCie has been superb. The three I own were bought in 2003 and 2004, two of those get daily use and continue to be reliable. People have also griped about Western Digital too, and my very first firewire drive is a WD 80g that I bought in 2002. It still works perfectly too. All drive makers have had problems from time to time. I'll never forgive IBM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mac Pro 2.8 .. How many harddrives? boogiemotel Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 5 12-02-2008 12:24 PM
harddrives lackofcolor310 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 4 06-08-2007 02:30 PM
Harddrives variation 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 0 01-17-2006 01:05 AM
V10 with firewire harddrives Helgonet Post - Surround - Video 6 06-08-2005 04:51 AM
New wd harddrives MR808 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 5 10-31-2003 10:17 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:52 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com