|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How much better does HD need to be?
Seriously.
You really need more than 192 tracks to make your point? Please complete this sentence: "If I only had 2000 tracks I could....." Offline bounce would be nice, and rock solid VI's, but beyond that, what do we really need? Cheaper control surfaces. Speedier start-up. Automated file backup (not just the session doc) Much larger undo buffer. 32 is too few. Rock solid delay compensation. Record enabled midi tracks always in record. Automated import from other DAWs. Freeze tracks? This is getting silly. Anyone else have any suggestions? Best...H |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How much better does HD need to be?
...mix many movies at once!
__________________
BcA. Tomas Vitha Sound Designer and Mixer 2010 Mac Pro 8-core Westmere, OS X 10.6.6, PT HD 9.0.3, Mbox 2 Pro, C|24 |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: How much better does HD need to be?
Offline bounce would be nice, and rock solid VI's, +1 The Logic all tracks to Audio
Cheaper control surfaces. (3K 24 fader Mute Solo Select, 1 encoder, Meters and 7.1 Monitor) option. hybrid c/24 meets Mix/control Freeze tracks? covered by offline bounce |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How much better does HD need to be?
+1
...and automatic background rendering and freeze And a row of 48 flying faders with scribble, mute, solo and pan.
__________________
Mercy Sound Recording Studios NYC http://www.mercysound.com/ facebook.com/mercysound/ instagram.com/mercysoundstudios/ Next Generation Pro Tools-Realize the only plugins needing to be active are on the track you're currently editing & those affected by it...all others should be quickly, seamlessly and auto background rendered into audio. Now dust off your G5s. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How much better does HD need to be?
Import whatever I want, route whatever I want and never ever again have to even think about voice allocation or track counts .... Awesome
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: How much better does HD need to be?
- offline bounce (just for quick previews, hardware inserts should be auto-bypassed)
- doubled or free voices - auto input and record-mute when bouncing (or a dedicated option in the preferences to choose) - hardware-insert quick-bypass/mute option - more inputs and sends - level-meters beeing expandable up to the whole channel-height - a phase button - full cpu support
__________________
Selling: |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How much better does HD need to be?
The ability to not have to WAIT for ANYTHING.
That's my dream.... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How much better does HD need to be?
OK, 2000 voices it is.
Best...H |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Re: How much better does HD need to be?
...find a use for 2001 tracks?
__________________
Desktop build: PT 2020.5 / Win 11 / i9-11900K @ 5.1GHz / 64GB / 4TB NVMe PCIe 4 / Gigabyte Z590 Vision D / PreSonus 2626 Laptop: PT 2020.5 / Win 11 / i5-12500H / 16GB / 1TB NVMe / Lenovo IdeaPad 5i Pro / U-PHORIA UMC1820 Ancient/Legacy (still works!): PT 5 & 6 / OS9 & OSX / Mac G4 / DIGI 001 Click for audio/video demo Click for resume |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How much better does HD need to be?
- Save/Recall Channels
- More voices (due to the whole RTAS/TDM/RTAS channel thing - RTAS plugs that don't crash!!! TDM is stable why can we have stable RTAS? |
|
|