Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #171  
Old 12-09-2007, 01:31 PM
Petander Petander is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 297
Default Re: Performance hit in PT 7.4

Bump. Rant from a pro tunesmith to come:



So, I just write songs but every now and then my tracks are being used in the final product, made on "real PT" in real studios. Just Like my Atari Falcon / Cubase audio tracks were used at that time around 15 years ago or so. I like to finish my stuff. I transfered Roland HD portastudio multitracker stuff from my place to pro PT as well, many times.



( Now, those "DAW:S" were fun to work on despite all the hassle that was involved. I had to make this little introduction so my point may get through a little better. Iīm not alone on this. )




I wonder what this PTLE 7.4 update does in terms of people "updating" their DAW:s?



I no longer think of getting a Quad or Octo, it looks like by staying on PTLE7.1 my two year old, reliable and fast clocked Dualcore can do nearly the same on 7.1 as a Quad does on 7.4.




PTLE 7.4 is a teaser. Now itīs cool to "make beats" on Pro Tools, right?




Now, donīt get me wrong, 7.4 has worked very well for me. I have worked long days for a couple of weeks now, PTLE 7.4 runs smooth, is very responsive, all my plugs work. EA is very nice if you need it. I have pushed 7.4 to the max all the time and it wonīt crash... unless I try to open large sessions made on an earlier PTLE version. I think I rebooted once last week, all new stuff on 7.4. Today I realised that many of my old sessions wonīt even open in 7.4, they were already maxed on this computer, at least close.


Of course I noticed the need for larger buffers but it was somehow tolerable, I had no 002R here now and MBox2 buffer is huge anyway but I can live with it when overdubbing or mixing.



So, no 7.4 reliability issues here , the opposite. I like 7.4 and it really runs for days in a row here, just like any 7xx has done on this setup. My computer just became hopelessly obsolete. I understand this is part of the game but somehow this jump looks too big. At first it didnīt look that bad... but to get back to old sessions... oh man. A no go for me on 7.4.



No problems though. I use removable system drives and Ghost anyway , easy to use an earlier PTLE I like. But my 003 purchase just got delayed and I think Iīm not the only one.



If EA is doing all this downgrading, how about a master switch, sort of? Beat maker kids ( no pun ) use EA for sure but we old farts like to record audio that is being performed well in the first place. I sure would like to try EA on some of my finished, large 7.3 whatever sessions but as you see, as we all know... they wonīt even open on this resource hog.


Well, end of the rant here. I donīt really know why I posted this, probably the bad taste in my mouth.
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------

- i7 520 @ 3.6 GHz / P6T / XP32 / PTLE 8.01 . PT9 on Snow .
- PTLE8 on a macbook.

- And a bunch of miscellaneous obsolete hardware from the past. Like Mix ++++ 64 i/o with Control/24


I`m In The Band: www.ozofficial.com
My guitars are in tune : http://www.truetemperament.com/site/index.php
Reply With Quote
  #172  
Old 12-21-2007, 04:35 AM
Shan's Avatar
Shan Shan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 13,582
Default Re: Performance hit in PT 7.4

Looks like we have a fix for the greyed out processor selection with multi-core AMD's.

Since I moved back to 7.3.1, I wont be able to check this out until the weekend. Santa came early.

Shane
__________________
Pro Tools Power User Editing

Give your plug-ins a facelift...and skin 'em!
__________________

"Music should be performed by the musician, not by the engineer."

Michael Wagener 25th July 2005, 02:59 PM

__________________

Pro Tools|HD Native 9.0.1 | Pro Tools|HDX 10.2 | Studio One | REAPER 4.22 | HD OMNI | HoboMac Pro 2.26Ghz Quad-Core | W7 Ultimate 64-bit
Reply With Quote
  #173  
Old 12-21-2007, 09:26 AM
spkguitar's Avatar
spkguitar spkguitar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 18,161
Default Re: Performance hit in PT 7.4

Confirmed!

Processor selection is fixed


And we got our color opacity settings back!
__________________
My Website: Pro Tools "Newbie" Help

Studio rig: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R, Intel i7 920, 6GB Patriot DDR3, NVidia 8600GS, LG GGW-H20L BD-RE, Sony CRX195E1 CD-RW, 2x WD Caviar black 640GB (os swap), 1x WD caviar 320GB (sessions), 1x Maxtor 120GB (sessions), 1x Seagate 1TB (samples/loops), Profire2626, Command8, PT12 on OSX

Mobile Rig: 2015 MacBook Pro Retina, Apollo Twin, PT12
Reply With Quote
  #174  
Old 12-21-2007, 12:55 PM
Petander Petander is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 297
Default Re: Performance hit in PT 7.4

Excellent.
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------

- i7 520 @ 3.6 GHz / P6T / XP32 / PTLE 8.01 . PT9 on Snow .
- PTLE8 on a macbook.

- And a bunch of miscellaneous obsolete hardware from the past. Like Mix ++++ 64 i/o with Control/24


I`m In The Band: www.ozofficial.com
My guitars are in tune : http://www.truetemperament.com/site/index.php
Reply With Quote
  #175  
Old 12-21-2007, 05:09 PM
sunburst79 sunburst79 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio USA
Posts: 12,763
Default Re: Performance hit in PT 7.4

Excellent!

Hats off to Digi and the timing is a gift!

I'm happy for all the AMD users.
__________________
Scott

Formerly Hobo Wan Kenobi

Core 2 Specs Page

ASUS P6T6 Revolution | i7 930 | 12GB OCZ DDR3 1600 7-7-7-20 | PTLE 10 | CPTK | 003 | Presonus D8 | 11Rack | Alesis AI3 | Presonus HP60 | Mercury + Studio Classics | Sound Toys | MasseyPack | Axiom61 | MAudio Keystation Pro 88
Reply With Quote
  #176  
Old 12-21-2007, 05:14 PM
filosofem filosofem is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Christchurch NZ
Posts: 11,864
Default Re: Performance hit in PT 7.4

Thanks sunburst!






filosofem
__________________
Aaron Mulqueen - 001 HD Native
Reply With Quote
  #177  
Old 12-22-2007, 08:24 AM
Petander Petander is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 297
Default Re: Performance hit in PT 7.4

It looks like I can use smaller buffers now.


With this cs2 update my dualcore wants a "larger" buffer first , when opening a large recent 7.4 session. After I visit 1024 or so, I can settle down with 128 in many cases. It used to be at least 256 in these recent 7.4 sessions of mine, usually 512 which is a pain for overdubs.


I have only used Mbox2 with this update by now and Mbox2 generally needs larger buffers than a 002R which I also use.



Looks good, thanks. Maybe dualcoreīs arenīt that obsolete after all.
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------

- i7 520 @ 3.6 GHz / P6T / XP32 / PTLE 8.01 . PT9 on Snow .
- PTLE8 on a macbook.

- And a bunch of miscellaneous obsolete hardware from the past. Like Mix ++++ 64 i/o with Control/24


I`m In The Band: www.ozofficial.com
My guitars are in tune : http://www.truetemperament.com/site/index.php
Reply With Quote
  #178  
Old 12-22-2007, 10:12 AM
RonB RonB is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 30
Default Re: Performance hit in PT 7.4

Quote:
It looks like I can use smaller buffers now.


With this cs2 update my dualcore wants a "larger" buffer first , when opening a large recent 7.4 session. After I visit 1024 or so, I can settle down with 128 in many cases. It used to be at least 256 in these recent 7.4 sessions of mine, usually 512 which is a pain for overdubs.


I have only used Mbox2 with this update by now and Mbox2 generally needs larger buffers than a 002R which I also use.



Looks good, thanks. Maybe dualcoreīs arenīt that obsolete after all.
You might want to check into upgrading your cpu to a AMD 64 X2 4800 socket939. You can find them on ebay OEM.
Easy swap of the chips no flashing the bios needed. If you've never done this before you can find the instructions with pictures at the AMD website.
I did from a 3800 X2 like yours and everything is working great ,other than the dreaded intermittent white noise busrts after ugrading to 7.4
If you do I recommend using ArticSilver 5 thermal compound to protect your cpu.


Peace
Reply With Quote
  #179  
Old 12-22-2007, 11:25 AM
Petander Petander is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 297
Default Re: Performance hit in PT 7.4

Quote:


You might want to check into upgrading your cpu to a AMD 64 X2 4800 socket939. You can find them on ebay OEM.
Easy swap of the chips no flashing the bios needed. If you've never done this before you can find the instructions with pictures at the AMD website.
I did from a 3800 X2 like yours and everything is working great ,other than the dreaded intermittent white noise busrts after ugrading to 7.4
If you do I recommend using ArticSilver 5 thermal compound to protect your cpu.


Peace

Thanks a lot but my system is ridiculously stable, has been for two years ever since I built this one. Iīve been running this CPU OC:d from 2G ( nominal for a 3800) to 2,5G all this time with the boxed fan. 2,5 is the standard 4800 clock I suppose and no matter how good overclocker 4800 is, I wouldnīt gain much in this case.


It will be an "octopussycore" for me when I need more oomph. This recent system of mine will be a spare in our recording place, with no tweaks or changes. PTLE can run for weeks without closing - not to mention booting- on this one, I work almost every day on this and I never shut down or close PTLE or the computer. Not unless I do a ghost and an update like today.


But thanks anyway.
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------

- i7 520 @ 3.6 GHz / P6T / XP32 / PTLE 8.01 . PT9 on Snow .
- PTLE8 on a macbook.

- And a bunch of miscellaneous obsolete hardware from the past. Like Mix ++++ 64 i/o with Control/24


I`m In The Band: www.ozofficial.com
My guitars are in tune : http://www.truetemperament.com/site/index.php
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mac Pro Performance master-fader macOS 0 11-21-2011 02:08 PM
PT9 Performance? Chingy Pro Tools 9 4 11-09-2010 03:20 PM
More RAM = no better performance?!? fly-deluxe 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 10 01-09-2004 06:14 PM
OSX vs OS9 performance Stage 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 8 05-23-2003 06:58 PM
about HD performance 8e design Storage Subsystems 1 07-28-2002 10:08 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:46 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com