|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Performance hit in PT 7.4
Quote:
Quote:
brandy [/QUOTE] Dude, He doesnt WORK for digidesign. Demanding stuff and being rude?? I don't know WHY on EARTH he comes here and takes abuse from people he is trying to HELP. Seriously. I Hope that SHAWN tells all of you ingrates where to "put the help files". -Justin
__________________
5198 Studios |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Performance hit in PT 7.4
Relax guy’s...
Brandy has been a troll from day one... I have yet to see a useful post from the guy, it’s all classic troll stuff... if you react & get wound up, the troll wins... N |
#33
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Performance hit in PT 7.4
Quote:
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Performance hit in PT 7.4
Hi
To be honest I would prefer to stay with the point in question, i would say that your the rude one. I would not call anybody Dude nor would I refer to somebody as an ingrate.So dont try yo be sombody your not. I will also be the first to admit that Shawn is probabally right, since working some more with this update I would say I jumped too quick. So my friend stop getting you knickers in a twist.Were all adults here. Please note my forum name and if you want my real name Ill give you that too. Brandy |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Performance hit in PT 7.4
Quote:
filosofem
__________________
Aaron Mulqueen - 001 HD Native |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Performance hit in PT 7.4
Quote:
Shane
__________________
Pro Tools Power User Editing Give your plug-ins a facelift...and skin 'em! __________________ "Music should be performed by the musician, not by the engineer." Michael Wagener 25th July 2005, 02:59 PM __________________ Pro Tools|HD Native 9.0.1 | Pro Tools|HDX 10.2 | Studio One | REAPER 4.22 | HD OMNI | HoboMac Pro 2.26Ghz Quad-Core | W7 Ultimate 64-bit |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Performance hit in PT 7.4
thanks DIGI!
__________________
dual opteron 280,4gb ram, win xp sp2,digi002, pt le 7.0 |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Performance hit in PT 7.4
Quote:
ingrate n. ungrateful person. If the shoe fits. To demand things from someone who has no obligation to help you seems ungrateful to me. So, troll feeding over. Cheers, Good luck with the help docs.
__________________
5198 Studios |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Performance hit in PT 7.4
Quote:
If I am ever pulled up on it I tell people I am being Ironic N |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Performance hit in PT 7.4
Wow...this thread has grown a bit...
Preface: Only OS X, one machine Tiger, one Leopard. No bootcamp, no XP. Only reason for posting is people were poking into figuring if the issues were Intel or AMD..and I figure providing Mac feedback would help, if only a little, as I am all Intel Mac. I finally got to run my Mac Pro + Tiger + 7.4 today. 99% cpu, 4 processors, 32 sample buffer. Loaded in several audio tracks using my 002, 44.1k/24. Runs a bit smoother for me, but I can make it produce a "held off interrupts for too long" thing consistently. But, IMO, that is a firewire thing (Digi- please? a PCIe solution for LE is desperately needed). RTAS via Leopard and 7.4 is touch n go to say the least. Leopard is unsupported (yet..), so I do not expect anything. Yes, I completely forgot I was even running Leopard, installed, and complained...duh! On my Mac Pro, 32 samples, Absynth 4 was killin, other Arturia and NI were doin great as well. BFD was spittin, even tho no CPU loading was showing in the Digi SYstem Usage. Maybe 30-40% peaks here and there. All internal SATA's, so I am guessing it is simply BFD and PT still not completely happy with each other...or, that plus firewire I/O, 32 sampel buffer, etc. Pop it up to 64 samples, and all was fine. I can work wth BFD at a lower buffer setting now than before; decent size session, BFD + Ivory + another VI, and 128 buffer is fine. 512 was min before. Once Leopard is supported, we'll see what happens. Logic got a pretty good boost!
__________________
nikki k Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines. On the other hand, you have different fingers. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mac Pro Performance | master-fader | macOS | 0 | 11-21-2011 02:08 PM |
PT9 Performance? | Chingy | Pro Tools 9 | 4 | 11-09-2010 03:20 PM |
More RAM = no better performance?!? | fly-deluxe | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 10 | 01-09-2004 06:14 PM |
OSX vs OS9 performance | Stage | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 8 | 05-23-2003 06:58 PM |
about HD performance | 8e design | Storage Subsystems | 1 | 07-28-2002 10:08 PM |