|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Performance difference between Native and HDX
I currently have ProTools HD 10.2 with a Native card and an Omni and HD unit. I have had good luck and performance. Recently I have been running enough tracks, with Rtas plug-ins, sends, and automation that I am running up against the Native CPU limit.
What I am curious for those who have switched from native to HDX. Are there any additional pro tools functions (non plug-in DSP) that are processed through the HDX card that are not processed as part of the Native card such that a person would see an improvement going to HDX from Native? PC: Windows 7 Professional 64-bit / ASUS P6X58-E WS / Intel Xeon W3680 @ 3.33 GHz / 24GB RAM MEM [4GBx3 CRUCIAL_CT3KIT51272BA1339 ECC Non-Buffered; 2 kits] / Gigabyte nVidia GTX 470 1280MB / 128GB M4 SSD System Drive / 128GB M4 SSD active session drive / 1 OCZ 60GB SSD Page file / multiple HDD for storage |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Performance difference on Macbook Pro | lampmusic | Pro Tools 11 | 3 | 08-05-2013 03:55 AM |
Performance difference? | adflaker | macOS | 2 | 01-14-2012 06:59 AM |
Has anyone noticed a performance difference with PT 8? | postprosound | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 0 | 12-21-2008 11:37 AM |
Much performance difference between PCI and PCI-X? | PhilBuckle | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 10 | 01-27-2006 03:44 PM |
16 VS 24 Bit. Performance Difference? | a2zproductions | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 10 | 06-07-2001 11:36 AM |