View Single Post
  #3  
Old 06-23-2012, 12:34 AM
Shan's Avatar
Shan Shan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 13,583
Default Re: Performance difference between Native and HDX

Quote:
Originally Posted by MADIrouting View Post

Are there any additional pro tools functions (non plug-in DSP) that are processed through the HDX card that are not processed as part of the Native card such that a person would see an improvement going to HDX from Native?
The mix engine, surround engine, voices, HEAT, ADC and DSP plug-ins all use the chips on the card. The mix engine and ADC don't even use 1% of the CPU in native, so you wont see any improvement there at all. You'll see the most noticeable improvement when using plug-ins. Run as many DSP plug-ins as you can in HDX first, and offload to native only if you start running out of DSP power. If you track through plug-ins, use DSP plug-ins so you don't have to worry about buffer settings when using native plug-ins. If you start to run out of DSP for tracking, then offload some of your previously recorded finished tracks to native by using the DSP to Native button in the plug-in window. Save the DSP for tracking. Though possible, it's best to avoid mixing DSP and Native plug-ins on the same track. Keep them separate and try to use DSP only.

Hope that helps.

Shane
__________________
Pro Tools Power User Editing

Give your plug-ins a facelift...and skin 'em!
__________________

"Music should be performed by the musician, not by the engineer."

Michael Wagener 25th July 2005, 02:59 PM

__________________

Pro Tools|HD Native 9.0.1 | Pro Tools|HDX 10.2 | Studio One | REAPER 4.22 | HD OMNI | HoboMac Pro 2.26Ghz Quad-Core | W7 Ultimate 64-bit
Reply With Quote