|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sure Beta 52
Can anyone get a good sound from a Beta 52? I've tried a million things and am convinced that either my mic is busted, or its just a terrible kick mic. I get really weak positive half-cycles and normal negative half-cycles. Its been like this since I bought it, so I don't know if it has more potential. I am so upset at myself for saving $15 and going with the 52 instead of the D112.
Aidas [img]images/icons/mad.gif[/img] |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sure Beta 52
Go back to the shop and ask if you can change it over.....
__________________
What's that? - That's the machine that goes "pling". Bastiaan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sure Beta 52
Sounds like you got a bad mic. We use the 52 quite alot, and it sounds good right off the mic preamp, and in most cases never gets eq'd as it sounds so good once the right spot is obtained.
Take the previous posters suggestion and take it back to the point of purchase. It is worth getting one that works properly. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sure Beta 52
Hi
I've been using the B52 in studio and in live music situations for three years now, and I've always got great results: it really captures the kick tone, and doesn't need much EQ since it's own frequency response it's already tailored to the kick drum. Make sure yours isn't working properly, and once you'll have it fixed you won't miss the D112 at all. L.G. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SSL BEta | sw rec | AAX Plug-ins | 6 | 03-14-2014 03:20 PM |
Avid Audio beta program--Win 7 and Pro Tools beta testers wanted! | Betaman | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 0 | 09-04-2009 10:54 AM |
Avid Audio beta program--Win 7 and Pro Tools beta testers wanted! | Betaman | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Win) | 0 | 09-04-2009 09:57 AM |
PT 6.2LE Beta ? :) | Rock_Artist | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 4 | 10-03-2003 10:10 AM |