Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Hardware > Pro Tools | Carbon

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-08-2024, 04:40 PM
Ptbright Ptbright is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2024
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 36
Default Carbon vs Apollo latency with autotune

Hello all,

If recording a single channel, does the carbon offer reduced latency when tracking with autotune vs the Apollo? This would be my sole reason for getting the carbon as will likely use an external preamp. Has anyone who has used both for this application noticed a difference latency wise? Is it markedly reduced? Will usually record with autotune, a reverb, and compressor insert through console for monitoring purposes only.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-08-2024, 07:35 PM
WHelbsing WHelbsing is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Germany
Posts: 32
Default Re: Carbon vs Apollo latency with autotune

My Autotune Hybrid has 1,7 ms in DSP-mode (Carbon).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-09-2024, 05:01 AM
Ptbright Ptbright is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2024
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 36
Default Re: Carbon vs Apollo latency with autotune

Quote:
Originally Posted by WHelbsing View Post
My Autotune Hybrid has 1,7 ms in DSP-mode (Carbon).
Thanks for replying. Is that at 48khz?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-09-2024, 12:09 PM
WHelbsing WHelbsing is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Germany
Posts: 32
Default Re: Carbon vs Apollo latency with autotune

Yes.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-09-2024, 02:59 PM
digiot digiot is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: NYC,NY
Posts: 517
Default Re: Carbon vs Apollo latency with autotune

As far as I can tell Autotune Hybrid (which is the only AAX DSP version available) was never updated for ARM. So you would need to tun it on either an Intel Mac or in Rosetta mode.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-10-2024, 02:16 AM
WHelbsing WHelbsing is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Germany
Posts: 32
Default Re: Carbon vs Apollo latency with autotune

No.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-10-2024, 08:26 AM
martthie_08 martthie_08 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 377
Default Re: Carbon vs Apollo latency with autotune

Auto Tune Hybrid works fine in silicon native with Pro Tools.
Before I got the free upgrade to Pro 10 that was all I was using..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-15-2024, 06:23 AM
Kunst Kunst is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: London
Posts: 32
Default Re: Carbon vs Apollo latency with autotune

Quote:
Originally Posted by martthie_08 View Post
Auto Tune Hybrid works fine in silicon native with Pro Tools.
Before I got the free upgrade to Pro 10 that was all I was using..
Hi - how does autotune hybrid work fine in silicon native if it hasn’t been updated for Apple silicon?

Antares tech support have told me repeatedly that it has not been updated for the new Apple chips, so in order to use it don’t you have to use ProTools in Rosetta mode?

Or is there something I’m missing? I can’t test it as I still have my Intel machine and haven’t upgraded to silicon yet…
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-15-2024, 06:55 AM
martthie_08 martthie_08 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 377
Default Re: Carbon vs Apollo latency with autotune

it works fine here on Ventura M1 Macbook, no need for Rosetta.
no idea why Antares are not being clear on this!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-15-2024, 07:04 AM
Kunst Kunst is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: London
Posts: 32
Default Re: Carbon vs Apollo latency with autotune

Quote:
Originally Posted by martthie_08 View Post
it works fine here on Ventura M1 Macbook, no need for Rosetta.
no idea why Antares are not being clear on this!
Thank you for writing back.

I am completely baffled by this.

This is the response I got from Antares on the 4th December after asking them specifically about Hybrid:


///

Thank you for reaching out to us!
The following plug-ins are officially compatible with Apple Silicon:

Auto-Tune Pro 11
Auto-Tune Pro X
Auto-Key
Auto-Key 2
Auto-Tune Access 10
Auto-Tune EFX+ 10
Auto-Tune Artist
Vocal Effects (including Mic Mod and Harmony Engine)
Auto-Tune Vocodist
Auto-Tune Slice
Auto-Tune SoundSoap
Auto-Tune Vocal Compressor
Auto-Tune Vocal EQ

All current Antares Auto-Tune editions, as well as all Vocal Effects, are Apple Silicon Native – compatible on both Apple M1 and M2 machines.

Please note Auto-Tune Pro 9 is not officially compatible with Apple Silicon.

In the meantime, we recommend opening your DAW with Rosetta by following the steps below:

Locate your DAW in the Applications folder
Right-Click your DAW and select "Get Info"
In the Info Window, check the "Open in Rosetta" box
Please let us know if you need further assistance.


Best Regards,
Antares Support
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Carbon vs Apollo noah330 Pro Tools 35 10-04-2023 02:36 PM
Carbon Ultimate/Autotune Promo SoundEng1 Pro Tools | Carbon 84 09-02-2021 09:00 AM
Any Carbon users who were using UAD Apollo before? Oblivion777 Pro Tools | Carbon 72 04-03-2021 04:51 PM
Strange Apollo Latency orangepopsongs01 Pro Tools 2018 11 06-07-2018 02:14 PM
latency with new setup ua apollo drewblue macOS 12 06-10-2013 06:20 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:17 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com