|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Carbon vs Apollo latency with autotune
Hello all,
If recording a single channel, does the carbon offer reduced latency when tracking with autotune vs the Apollo? This would be my sole reason for getting the carbon as will likely use an external preamp. Has anyone who has used both for this application noticed a difference latency wise? Is it markedly reduced? Will usually record with autotune, a reverb, and compressor insert through console for monitoring purposes only. Thanks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Carbon vs Apollo latency with autotune
My Autotune Hybrid has 1,7 ms in DSP-mode (Carbon).
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Carbon vs Apollo latency with autotune
Thanks for replying. Is that at 48khz?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Carbon vs Apollo latency with autotune
Yes.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Carbon vs Apollo latency with autotune
As far as I can tell Autotune Hybrid (which is the only AAX DSP version available) was never updated for ARM. So you would need to tun it on either an Intel Mac or in Rosetta mode.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Carbon vs Apollo latency with autotune
No.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Carbon vs Apollo latency with autotune
Auto Tune Hybrid works fine in silicon native with Pro Tools.
Before I got the free upgrade to Pro 10 that was all I was using.. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Carbon vs Apollo latency with autotune
Quote:
Antares tech support have told me repeatedly that it has not been updated for the new Apple chips, so in order to use it don’t you have to use ProTools in Rosetta mode? Or is there something I’m missing? I can’t test it as I still have my Intel machine and haven’t upgraded to silicon yet… |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Carbon vs Apollo latency with autotune
it works fine here on Ventura M1 Macbook, no need for Rosetta.
no idea why Antares are not being clear on this! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Carbon vs Apollo latency with autotune
Quote:
I am completely baffled by this. This is the response I got from Antares on the 4th December after asking them specifically about Hybrid: /// Thank you for reaching out to us! The following plug-ins are officially compatible with Apple Silicon: Auto-Tune Pro 11 Auto-Tune Pro X Auto-Key Auto-Key 2 Auto-Tune Access 10 Auto-Tune EFX+ 10 Auto-Tune Artist Vocal Effects (including Mic Mod and Harmony Engine) Auto-Tune Vocodist Auto-Tune Slice Auto-Tune SoundSoap Auto-Tune Vocal Compressor Auto-Tune Vocal EQ All current Antares Auto-Tune editions, as well as all Vocal Effects, are Apple Silicon Native – compatible on both Apple M1 and M2 machines. Please note Auto-Tune Pro 9 is not officially compatible with Apple Silicon. In the meantime, we recommend opening your DAW with Rosetta by following the steps below: Locate your DAW in the Applications folder Right-Click your DAW and select "Get Info" In the Info Window, check the "Open in Rosetta" box Please let us know if you need further assistance. Best Regards, Antares Support |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Carbon vs Apollo | noah330 | Pro Tools | 35 | 10-04-2023 02:36 PM |
Carbon Ultimate/Autotune Promo | SoundEng1 | Pro Tools | Carbon | 84 | 09-02-2021 09:00 AM |
Any Carbon users who were using UAD Apollo before? | Oblivion777 | Pro Tools | Carbon | 72 | 04-03-2021 04:51 PM |
Strange Apollo Latency | orangepopsongs01 | Pro Tools 2018 | 11 | 06-07-2018 02:14 PM |
latency with new setup ua apollo | drewblue | macOS | 12 | 06-10-2013 06:20 PM |