|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
PT9 Stock Plugins
My introduction to composing and recording music was Cubase 1 on a Pentium 4 with 256 MB RAM, then on to PT LE 6. I have never worked on an analog console, never patched outboard gear, or used hardware comps, eq's etc. Someone like me does not know what I'm missing because I never worked in an analog environment. I do, however, know how to select and record the appropriate sounds, then use stock plugs (if necessary) to get as close as possible to the sound I've heard on my favorite old records.
Questions: Do engineers buy the 3rd party hardware fx plugins simply because of familiarity, and they sound just like the hardware the engineer used? Or are they that superior to stock plugins, even though it is all a digital environment? The point of this post is not to suggest that hardware or software is better, and I totally understand using great outboard gear for recording. However, once it is ITB, is it necessary for example to spend so much on a Waves API comp when all I need to do is control transients. Also, this is not an affordable issue, but rather "necessity" considering how far stock plugins have come over the years. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT9 Stock Plugins
In most cases, 3rd party plugins have a specific sound or features that people want for their specific song or style. Especially in the case of vintage models. An API compressor plugin will sound very different from the stock Digi plugins.
In many cases, many 3rd party plugs are superior than stock plugins. But even top mixers will still sometimes use the stock plugins if if fits what they're doing at the moment. Don't feel that you have to buy a bunch of 3rd party plugs right now, but also realize it's not just people's imagination that 3rd party plugs sound different or better. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT9 Stock Plugins
Part of your premise is true... familiar is often equated to good. It is the reason that most producers in most applications requiring a Fender bass, or a Les Paul or a Stratocaster. Not because those instruments are better, but because they are familiar.
nst7 summed up the other reasons...
__________________
| Logic Pro 9 | Reason 6.5 | Pro Tools 10 | MOTU UltraLite mk3 | RME ADI-2 | Summit Audio 2BA-221 x 2 | MOTU 8pre x 2 | | Mac Pro (4,1) 2.26gHz Xeon x 2 16gB OS X 10.7.4 | Macbook Pro (8,2) 2.2gHz i7 Quad 16gB OS X 10.7.4 | |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT9 Stock Plugins
The only way to really get a proper answer that question is to hear the difference for yourself. There are certain pieces of gear that do certain things exceptionally well. That's why that gear has been ported to the software realm, as it were. If you need a lot of brightening, but need to keep it satiny smooth, that's what Neve EQ does. You can't push the high end hard with the stock EQ, or most 3rd party ones, for that matter; it gets harsh and weird. If you need more air and openness on top without it sounding all that much brighter, that's what Pultec EQ does, like nothing else. If you need to level out bass guitar or vocals in a way that's warm and fat and silky with little noticeable pumping, that's what the LA-2A does, like nothing else. If you want EQ that's tight, punchy, and clear from bottom to top, that's what API does, like nothing else. If you want a detailed, shimmery reverb on real acoustic piano, don't reach for D-verb; you need a good convolution type or else Lexicon or something fairly expensive.
I use the stock plugs mostly for utility work, like notching out a nasty ring from a bad room, flattening out a spike, and putting a touch of ambience on things. The only exception for me is the gate. I love the stock gate with its fully customizable sidechain EQs and the look-ahead feature. Pretty hard to beat that, IMO.
__________________
David J. Finnamore PT 2024.6 Ultimate | Clarett+ 8Pre | macOS 14.5 on a MacBook Pro M1 Max PT 2024.6 | Saffire Pro 40 | Win10 latest, HP Z440 64GB |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT9 Stock Plugins
Thanks, these are all great answers. daeron80 the examples really helped too. I guess if a bunch of pros are finding the sound and familiarity in, for example Waves or McDSP plugins, then that does say a lot.
Is it safe to say that if every memory of outboard fx gear was erased (how they sound and what they do), and we started over with the more expensive 3rd party and PT Stock, engineers would still chose 3rd party because the sound and what they do? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT9 Stock Plugins
Quote:
Some swear by the thousands of dollars worth of plugins they have... while some grammy winning engineers/producers stick with dverb and EQIII. It's not to say that the stock plugs are good or bad... they just don't have any particular character. 3rd party plugs are often emulated and designed to have a characteristic sound that some people like and some people don't. It's like picking any other piece of gear, really. Some swear by a $300 microphone, some swear by a $3000 microphone. It's easy to get lost in the vast options available, but in the end it just comes down to what you like and how you use it.
__________________
D a n t h e I n c r e d i b l e S o u n d M a n "Svetlana" v1 - 4.2GHz i7, 16GB RAM, OSX 10.7.4 Liquid Saffire 56 - PT10.2 - BFD2, VCC, Duende Native, Play 3.0 _C U R R E N T-D V E R B-S C O R E:515 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT9 Stock Plugins
Some brands have demos, either fully functional for a few days, or somewhat crippled, like a gentle noise-burst every 30 seconds or something. Worth trying them out and see what you like.
__________________
David J. Finnamore PT 2024.6 Ultimate | Clarett+ 8Pre | macOS 14.5 on a MacBook Pro M1 Max PT 2024.6 | Saffire Pro 40 | Win10 latest, HP Z440 64GB |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: PT9 Stock Plugins
I like that Massy lets you demo fully optional plugs. You just can't save set-ups.
__________________
Park The Transfer Lab at Video Park Analog tape to Pro Tools transfers, 1/4"-2" http://www.videopark.com MacPro 6 core 3.33 GHz, OS 10.12.1, 8 GB RAM, PT12.6.1, Focusrite Saffire Pro 40, PreSonus DigiMax, MC Control V3.5, dual displays, Neumann U-47, Tab V76 mic pre, RCA 44BX and 77DX, MacBook Pro 9,1, 2.3 Mhz, i7, CBS Labs Audimax and Volumax. Ampex 440B half-track and four-track, 351 tube full-track mono, MM-1100 16-track. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT9 Stock Plugins
Quote:
Good idea. This will at least let me know what other sounds are out there. I must admit I shy away from demos because I don't like having to clean up afterward. My demo - purchase ratio is horrible. But it would be a cool experiment regarding this thread. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT9 Stock Plugins
My advice would be to try the Massey stuff. Also you can find the Digi/BF optional plugs on ebay and the DUC really affordably and most of them are pretty good in their own right. The Pultec bundle, the Classic Compressor Bundle etc are all good alternative plugs in my opinion. Big fan of Slightly Rude Compressor.
For cleaning up tracks a lot of folks do use the EQIII and DynamicsIII plugs. They are great when you not looking for a character plug. Demo Demo Demo.
__________________
Scott Formerly Hobo Wan Kenobi Core 2 Specs Page ASUS P6T6 Revolution | i7 930 | 12GB OCZ DDR3 1600 7-7-7-20 | PTLE 10 | CPTK | 003 | Presonus D8 | 11Rack | Alesis AI3 | Presonus HP60 | Mercury + Studio Classics | Sound Toys | MasseyPack | Axiom61 | MAudio Keystation Pro 88 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Certain stock plugins do not show up in Pro Tools 11 | ilovemusic | Windows | 3 | 10-25-2014 06:44 PM |
PT 10 Stock Plugins Missing | ukno.dino | Windows | 2 | 01-02-2012 03:52 PM |
Solution for anyone missing PT 10 stock plugins. | mkd1973 | Windows | 0 | 01-02-2012 06:51 AM |
Pro Tools 10 Stock Plugins Missing | ukno.dino | Pro Tools 10 | 0 | 12-23-2011 12:59 PM |
Stock Plugins vs. Waves Gold | trans333 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 11 | 05-18-2005 04:42 PM |