|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
FabFilter's comment on AAX DSP
Can anyone parse this in terms of the AAX vs AAX DSP issue? What's between the lines here? Simply unwilling to take on the task or truly impossible?
Quote:
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FabFilter's comment on AAX DSP
What happened:
Quote:
Quote:
As long as they continue to improve their plug-ins, CPU footprint will presumably decrease. FabFilter Plug-ins are pretty effin' great, and I don't think lack of DSP is a dealbreaker for many FabFilter customers.
__________________
Pro Tools HD 12.4, Pro Tools "Vanilla" 12.4, Artist Transport, 2x Artist Mix Studio Blue: RME UCX, Win7 Pro, i7 960, 16GB || Studio Green: RME Babyface, Win10, i7 7700HQ, 16GB |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: FabFilter's comment on AAX DSP
Obviously willing or they would not have researched it.
What FF's I have work great in 11. Not impossible but not going to happen. Seems to be a pretty clear description above. The combo of Native and DSP is a win win for single card users.
__________________
(Help us Help You)<<<click here Profile-System Tracks: https://www.n1m.com/datatunesdetroit Apple Music https://music.apple.com/us/search?term=DatatunesDetroit |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: FabFilter's comment on AAX DSP
That comment was 11 months ago.
I wonder if his thoughts have changed knowing that 11,000 HDX systems have now been sold? Either way, it's a pretty hard dig on Avid's choices with regard to chips, infrastructure of HDX. I translated it to, we're happy servicing the HUGE native market and aren't interested in making headway into high end post or music. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FabFilter's comment on AAX DSP
There are plenty of options for people that need AAX DSP plug-ins. For what Fab Filter charges for their plug-ins there are lots of AAX DSP ( and they sound better too) options that cost far less than the FAB Filter plug-ins.
I have demo'd FAb Filter McDSP & Softube blow FF away. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: FabFilter's comment on AAX DSP
That Saturn plugin looks really cool. Oh well, hopefully Sound Toys gets into the AAX DSP market. FLUX has some good DSP plugins.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Re: FabFilter's comment on AAX DSP
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
~ tom thomas Formerly hobotom Pro Tools Ultimate 2024 HDX Hybrid HD Omni and 192 I/Os Windows 10 Intel Hexcore i7 All Samsung Pro SSDs Ampex MM1200 2" 24 trk tape Outboard: UREI, Eventide, Lexicon, Yamaha, TC Electronics, Orban, ART, EchoAudio, Dolby, Hughes, API, Neve, Audio Arts, BBE, Aphex, Berringer, MOTU, dbx, Allison, etc. Plug-ins: Too many to talk about. www.metrostudios.com |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: FabFilter's comment on AAX DSP
Quote:
__________________
Sam |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FabFilter's comment on AAX DSP
I love the Pro-Q, best UI I have seen for an EQ and it sounds great IMO.
Timeless is VERY deep, a nice addition to Echoboy and H-Delay.
__________________
http://www.merlinsound.de |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Re: FabFilter's comment on AAX DSP
I'd wager that every "high end" post and music house is incorporating native plugins to some degree. How DSP number-crunching makes anything high end is beyond me. FF works fine as they are and, given the task involved in transcoding, they're content leaving them that way. As am I.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Added FabFilter's Pro-DS De-Esser | jeffro | AAX Plug-ins | 0 | 10-05-2012 09:30 AM |
Fabfilter's Volcano compatible with M-Powered??? | realitypoint | Pro Tools M-Powered (Win) | 1 | 07-23-2007 07:21 PM |
Comment my mix please! | jeronimo | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 13 | 03-20-2002 10:05 AM |
Can somebody comment on my PC? please | Bjorn Arnason | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 6 | 05-31-2000 07:48 AM |
Any Comment ? | Ian Greaves | General Discussion | 0 | 03-15-2000 09:42 AM |