|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
omni/native latency vs mbox pro latency
Hi everyone.
I currently have the Mbox Pro wich has almost zero monitoring latency while tracking through the mixer. I might get a deal on omni/native but have concerns regarding the latency on this system. I wonder if native has lower latency than the direct monitoring of the mbox, or if it also has the possebillity of direct monitoring ? Iv grown accustomed to the direct monitoring of mbox pro and leave the buffer size at 1024. It would be bad if the latency is not better or atleast equal to the mbox pro direct monitoring. Also i will have to track beside the omni because of my small room so im wondering if the fan noise is still a problem. Third, might this be a bad time getting the omni/native combo ? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Still can't get Low Latency Monitoring With My HD Native Omni! | mmk | Pro Tools HDX & HD Native Systems (Mac) | 8 | 04-10-2020 01:19 PM |
HD Native latency | stevegalante | Pro Tools HDX & HD Native Systems (Mac) | 6 | 03-17-2014 11:49 PM |
PT HD Native & HDX / latency? | kirkbross | Pro Tools HDX & HD Native Systems (Mac) | 13 | 08-24-2013 09:48 AM |
HD NATIVE vs HD TDM latency | James Drake | Pro Tools 10 | 20 | 06-19-2012 04:27 PM |
HD Native latency | CamM | Pro Tools HDX & HD Native Systems (Mac) | 2 | 11-30-2010 07:02 PM |