Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-30-2005, 07:32 PM
EGS's Avatar
EGS EGS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,701
Default Apogee Rosetta 200, Presonus Digimax, Digi 002R

I am using a 002R with a Presonus Digimax (8 channel mic-pre via optical ADAT lightpipe to 002R) to get 16 simultaneous inputs. I am considering adding an Apogee Rosetta 200 to get all 18 inputs, and to provide a stable, high-end master clock. Apogee wordclock out to Digimax wordclock in, Digimax set to external clock. Apogee SPDIF out to 002R SPDIF in. What is the BEST way to slave the 002R to the Apogee master clock? That is, should I clock the 002R to the SPDIF input from the Apogee directly, or clock the 002R to the ADAT input (which would pass wordclock along the ADAT connection)? It seems to me that clocking to the Apogee SPDIF directly is a "shorter path", but I've heard that SPDIF does not pass clock as well as wordclock embedded in a lightpipe. Thoughts?
__________________
Desktop build: PT 2020.5 / Win 11 / i9-11900K @ 5.1GHz / 64GB / 4TB NVMe PCIe 4 / Gigabyte Z590 Vision D / PreSonus 2626
Laptop: PT 2020.5 / Win 11 / i5-12500H / 16GB / 1TB NVMe / Lenovo IdeaPad 5i Pro / U-PHORIA UMC1820
Ancient/Legacy (still works!): PT 5 & 6 / OS9 & OSX / Mac G4 / DIGI 001
Click for audio/video demo
Click for resume
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-30-2005, 10:52 PM
Scotty_OiArT Scotty_OiArT is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto East
Posts: 156
Default Re: Apogee Rosetta 200, Presonus Digimax, Digi 002R

In my experience both will pass Digital Signals with embedded Clocking information equally well

I suggest clocking off the Apogee Rosetta for it is the most stable, and slaving your digi002R off of the s/pdif input... BNC wordclock via coax cable from the wordclock out on the apogee to the digimax wordclock in. with this you will only need one Optical cable connected to your digi002R (the data outputing from the digimax)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-01-2005, 03:12 AM
gerax gerax is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Modena, Italy
Posts: 1,616
Default Re: Apogee Rosetta 200, Presonus Digimax, Digi 002R

I second this opinion, even though there's a discussion about the stability of clock via Spdif signal in a topic above; IMO, it's best to have the Rosetta act as master and clock everything else straight to it: I guess that the clock going into the Digimax via BNC has to be looped back to the 002 via ADAT, and if the reclocking of the Digimax isn't up to snuff then the whole thing about clocking to an external source becomes pointless; I'd go with a straight SPdif line from Rosetta to 002, using a good quality 75 Ohm SPdif cble (the shorter the better), and WC out via BNC to the Digimax, then ADAT in to the 002R; now I belive there shouldn't be problems with Pro Tools accepting two digital signals from different sources, even if the clock is ste to Spdif/external.
If you could report back your results I'd appreciate it very much, as I'm thinking about getting something similar for my setup (the only exception is that I'm eyeing a PSX100 and I use the ADAT I/O for send return of my digital outboards).

Thanx

L.G.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-01-2005, 07:21 AM
Scotty_OiArT Scotty_OiArT is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto East
Posts: 156
Default Re: Apogee Rosetta 200, Presonus Digimax, Digi 002R

Go Forum Go,

Its nice to see helpful people =)
By the way, Gerax hit a very important point when he mentioned use a high quality 75ohm coax cable for your S/PDIF Cable and BNC Wordclock Cable...

Shorter the better (extra foot or two won't hurt much but keep it as short as possible)

Most of the Users reporting clocking issues via spdif I am going to take a long shot guess (probably wrong) and say they could have been using a cheapo Basic RCA - RCA for their Precious Digital Information

Happy Recording
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-01-2005, 08:11 AM
Greg M Greg M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Alpena, MI
Posts: 1,247
Default Re: Apogee Rosetta 200, Presonus Digimax, Digi 002R

gerax,

The clocking chain described by Scotty is exactly how I have my ISA 430 MKII, Octopre, and 002r set up. The digital card in the ISA 430 MKII is the master clock. The setup is very stable. I've been doing this for over a year with no problems.

Greg
__________________
Intel i7 3930K, Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 (rev 1.0), 32 GB Corsair Vengeance 1600 ram, EVGA Nvidea GT 720 TI video card, a Samsung 850 Pro (256 GB) OS drive, 2 Samsung 850 Pro's (512 GB) in externally mounted drive bays for session and sample storage, Win 10 Pro, PT Ultimate (Native)2019.10, HD Omni, HD I/O 16x16 .
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-01-2005, 08:33 AM
gerax gerax is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Modena, Italy
Posts: 1,616
Default Re: Apogee Rosetta 200, Presonus Digimax, Digi 002R

Great to know, thanx for the info.

I have the ISA428 and the Octopre, and though I almost never use them to record with Pro Tools (I have them racked in my mobile rig for location recording gigs with the Mackie SDR2496) it could be useful should the necessity arise to set them up in my studio. Only thing is that the ISA428 has the digital card with ADAT out and WC, I may figure out a way to hook everything up.
Currently I have my outboard FX units hooked up via Spdif and ADAT (Lexicon MPX1 and Eventide Eclipse), but since I plan to get another pair of FX (like TC M3000 and PCM91) I could have them fed via an ADAT to AES converter and WC everything to the Rosetta 200/PSX100 hooking Spdif to the 002R. I guess it should work OK.

Cheers

L.G.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-01-2005, 10:01 AM
RolandK RolandK is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Portland, OR USA
Posts: 245
Default Re: Apogee Rosetta 200, Presonus Digimax, Digi 002R

I have a similar setup with the same configuration- 001, Rosetta AD as master clock, BNC going to Digimax LT. Works great, made a noticeable improvement.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-01-2005, 01:09 PM
EGS's Avatar
EGS EGS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,701
Default Re: Apogee Rosetta 200, Presonus Digimax, Digi 002R

RolandK and others,

Glad it's working for you, and I'm looking forward to getting my Apogee!!! So, back to my original question. The Apogee is to be the master clock for all 3 devices:

1) Apogee wordclock out to Digimax wordclock in (Digimax set to EXT clock), and then Digimax lightpipe connected to 002R.
2) Apogee SPDIF out to 002R SPDIF in, thus sending 2 more audio inputs to the 002R.

WHICH of these 2 digital inputs arriving to the 002R carries the BEST clock to the 002R, and therefore is the one I should use to slave the 002R to? SPDIF or ADAT optical? Some say SPDIF is not a stable carrier of clock, since it is an unbalanced, consumer-grade signal. Some say the Digimax might destabilize the clock as it throughputs the clock along. Which is best and why?

Thanx for all the comments and help!!

Gary
__________________
Desktop build: PT 2020.5 / Win 11 / i9-11900K @ 5.1GHz / 64GB / 4TB NVMe PCIe 4 / Gigabyte Z590 Vision D / PreSonus 2626
Laptop: PT 2020.5 / Win 11 / i5-12500H / 16GB / 1TB NVMe / Lenovo IdeaPad 5i Pro / U-PHORIA UMC1820
Ancient/Legacy (still works!): PT 5 & 6 / OS9 & OSX / Mac G4 / DIGI 001
Click for audio/video demo
Click for resume
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-01-2005, 02:11 PM
RolandK RolandK is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Portland, OR USA
Posts: 245
Default Re: Apogee Rosetta 200, Presonus Digimax, Digi 002R

I'm not a hardcore expert on this stuff, but IMHO:

The Apogee is the better clock. At least start out with it as master. I've never had a single problem with my setup and never heard of any problems with the s/pdf in general before today. I doubt the balanced vs. unbalanced cable is much of an issue. My Rosetta is right above the 001 and the s/pdf cable is only 18" long. If we were talking long distances, then maybe.

Get some good quality s/pdf and bnc cables (as short as possible), hook it all up in the different configurations and see which works best for you. I still think the Apogee as master will work great and you will be very happy with it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Protools hd + Apogee ad-16x + presonus digimax fs Juanlo Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 5 07-10-2008 07:16 PM
Digi 002R and Presonus DigiMAX FS gmusic 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 4 11-27-2007 02:54 AM
Digi 002R W/Apogee Rosetta sync bluesna 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 5 08-02-2005 08:40 AM
Apogee Rosetta 800 as front end to Digi 002r firebro 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 3 10-08-2003 07:39 PM
Some Questions Concerning an Apogee Rosetta , Lucid AD Converters , presonus digimax dwdrummer 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 13 11-03-2002 10:47 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:58 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com