|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Interfaces considered a "step up" from the Avid I|O?
Quote:
I do have a load of Dante converters- MTRX, Ferrofish Pulse 16DX, Focusrite A16R (x2), Red 16 Line, X2P. On paper (ie the published specification) MTRX is at the top, then the A16R/Red16 Line, then Ferrofish. Broadly speaking the quality is related to the cost- better stuff costs more... not a surprise. But in practice they all sound great- it really depends on what you are doing. If I am doing a lot of acoustic recording then I tend to use the MTRX's converters. But if I am out on location I take a Focusrite X2P. The Red 16 Line and Ferrofish largely record synths or non-acoustic instruments. No one has ever come back and said 'this sounds sh*t'. Personally I factor in connectivity, channel count, use and price before converter quality, because converter quality is broadly *very good* across the board. Even the prosumer stuff sounds good enough to release with now. I am not saying there isn't a difference, there is, but it isn't as marked as it used to be. The Red 16 Line wins on a lot of points because it is Thunderbolt and Digilink, so you have choice. It has 32 channels of Dante (I do wish it was 64 but never mind). It has an additional 16 channels over ADAT if you need it. Plus a great desktop app for routing signals. The MTRX is better across the board (conversion, channel count) but an MTRX with 16 IO and Dante is £10k vs £3k, so it should be better. But it doesn't have native thunderbolt. An DAD AX64 is better across the board than the Red16 Line but it will also be about the same cost and it doesn't do Digilink. (Actually I wonder how an AX64 + Rednet HD32R would work?)
__________________
James Richmond https://www.jamesrichmond.com 2019 Mac Pro, 2022 Mac Studio Ultra Avid S6, HDX2, MTRX II, MTRX, DAD AX64, AX32, Focusrite Rednet PCIER, Trinnov MC8 Pro. Studio: https://www.voltperoctave.com | Music: https://www.euclideancircuits.com Latest Article: Auto-Bounce for Logic Pro Affiliate Links: Auto-Bounce by Tom Salta Dreamhost Web Hosting |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Interfaces considered a "step up" from the Avid I|O?
Quote:
__________________
James Richmond https://www.jamesrichmond.com 2019 Mac Pro, 2022 Mac Studio Ultra Avid S6, HDX2, MTRX II, MTRX, DAD AX64, AX32, Focusrite Rednet PCIER, Trinnov MC8 Pro. Studio: https://www.voltperoctave.com | Music: https://www.euclideancircuits.com Latest Article: Auto-Bounce for Logic Pro Affiliate Links: Auto-Bounce by Tom Salta Dreamhost Web Hosting |
#33
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Interfaces considered a "step up" from the Avid I|O?
... but commented anyway
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Interfaces considered a "step up" from the Avid I|O?
No, I didn't comment on comparing the HDIO against the Red16Line.
__________________
James Richmond https://www.jamesrichmond.com 2019 Mac Pro, 2022 Mac Studio Ultra Avid S6, HDX2, MTRX II, MTRX, DAD AX64, AX32, Focusrite Rednet PCIER, Trinnov MC8 Pro. Studio: https://www.voltperoctave.com | Music: https://www.euclideancircuits.com Latest Article: Auto-Bounce for Logic Pro Affiliate Links: Auto-Bounce by Tom Salta Dreamhost Web Hosting |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Interfaces considered a "step up" from the Avid I|O?
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Interfaces considered a "step up" from the Avid I|O?
__________________
James Richmond https://www.jamesrichmond.com 2019 Mac Pro, 2022 Mac Studio Ultra Avid S6, HDX2, MTRX II, MTRX, DAD AX64, AX32, Focusrite Rednet PCIER, Trinnov MC8 Pro. Studio: https://www.voltperoctave.com | Music: https://www.euclideancircuits.com Latest Article: Auto-Bounce for Logic Pro Affiliate Links: Auto-Bounce by Tom Salta Dreamhost Web Hosting |
#37
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Interfaces considered a "step up" from the Avid I|O?
More great info is coming in. Thanks again!
|
#38
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Interfaces considered a "step up" from the Avid I|O?
I've been talking to a couple people today -- all of them are happy having gotten rid of their HD Native Thunderbolt boxes and prefer their new interfaces. Seems that I need to get rid of my (hard to justify) fears of connecting an interface directly to the computer. That stems from the old days when drivers were often a mess and latency was an issue. Avid's hardware made those fears go away. Today, the playing field is level, and you're all even suggesting that the advantage is now in the other court.
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Interfaces considered a "step up" from the Avid I|O?
RME USB (and OK Thunderbolt) driver/software quality is one of the attractions to me of their stuff and now I'm probably a RME addict, as is their flexibility with stuff like Totalmix and support for MADI... it was not audio quality that sold me on their gear... but yes it sounds great.
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Interfaces considered a "step up" from the Avid I|O?
Quote:
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Installing from - "Setup.exe Application" or "Avid Pro Tools Windows installer"? | ihate100bees | Windows | 1 | 05-08-2021 08:35 AM |
Pro Tools 11 hangs up at "loading midi engine" step for 10 minutes | kevinjrowe | macOS | 0 | 08-23-2014 12:25 PM |
Triggering "step-thru" loops with Roland TD-4, SPD-S, and mac possible? | robo456 | The Drum Room | 2 | 10-06-2012 10:43 AM |
"Step phaser" effect on Eleven Rack? | julyen | Eleven Rack | 3 | 08-18-2011 10:24 AM |
NCT AudioFile2--->step 1. Then "coreflood" hack | aka21stCentury | General Discussion | 2 | 04-14-2011 06:24 PM |