|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools Clock vs. Interface Clocks
Quote:
When there is more than one clock in a signal chain/system, the only thing that needs to be done is to choose one of those clocks for clocking the entire signal chain/system. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools Clock vs. Interface Clocks
With a dedicated clock you’re running a tighter system. Interfaces only can go but so far. So you get less jitter and superior crystals with dedicated units. You get what you paid for. Once transferred, the digital playback would be based on the operator’s word clock. It’s similar to translating from one system to the next.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
spinsong.com |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools Clock vs. Interface Clocks
Not necessarily Not necessarily
Quote:
The biggest point of external clocks is having a centralised clock for all your digital gear so they work seamlessly together. The rest, after that, is mostly marketing and very dependant on how each piece of gear deals with clock in the first place. But if you have 3 or less pieces of gear that need clock synchronization, spending money on an external clock is pretty worthless and funds are better spent elsewhere. (Why 3 -- because you can adequately send from one gear to 2 word clock inputs with minimal signal strength degradation or reflections using just BNC T connectors and 75ohm terminators. After 3, you need to consider cable length and distribution amplifiers.)
__________________
Pro Tools Ult 2024.3.1, HDX 2, MTRX/SPQ, RME BBF Pro + MADIface Pro • S1 x 2, Fire Max11 x 2, Dock, iPad Air5 • Mac Mini 14,12, 12 core, macOS 13.6.6 • RAM 32GB, SSD 4TB, GPU 19 core • QNAP TVS-872XT 148TB TB3 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools Clock vs. Interface Clocks
Quote:
(I spent time in a research group that developed exotic low phase noise precision oscillators, the marketing ******** in audio and especially idiot audiophile land just gets up my nose). It is nice to see when folks do pull out a Miller analyzer or similar and actually measure phase noise… there are still products that get released with phase noise problems, including where a better external clock might not help. Some “audiophile” external DACs for example show phase noise in ways that makes me suspect they just don’t have competent engineering teams and just never bothered looking at this during development. It’s hard to have a well funded engineering team who can do all this, it’s easy to slap something that works into a fancy looking expensive box and make up some hyped claims for it. Last edited by Darryl Ramm; 07-03-2022 at 02:22 PM. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools Clock vs. Interface Clocks
Hello,
This is a different topic but it fits the thread's titlle, so I guess the knowledge involved here should also be able to answer my question ! I'm a fairly advanced PT user and problem solver but this is something new... My old PT 10, which is still perfect for recording and mixing music, doesn't open properly OMF or AAF files from modern softwares like Premiere and Resolve. As I have a more modern Mac Pro 5.1 for editing and color grading, I solved the problem by buying a PT 12-2018 license for that "modern world" computer, so I can mix to film. At first, I had a small Ego-Sys U2A (old but still worth more than an Mbox, apparently) going into my monitor controller's analog inputs. Then I needed the converter for something else and decided to run a light-pipe from the optical output of the computer to the digital input of the controller. I did wonder about an eventual clocking issue but, as the software ran smooth and sounded okay (for films), I didn't question it very long. Soon I have to record a voice over so, instead of switching to the old system (they share the same screens), I thought about connecting the ADAT output of an Amek DMCL to the optical intput of the computer and record directly into my movie mixing session. Now I'm really wondering what's going to happen, clockwise... Fundamentally, my question is : is it okay to have PT clocked by the computer or should I really use an interface ?
__________________
Pro Tools 10 HD3 - Apple Mac Pro 1.1 - Mac OS 10.9 - Digidesign 192 Black Lion mod - Apogee AD-8000 + AMBUS HD
Euphonix MC Mix - Audient Centro - APS Coax - Avantone Mixcube - Acoustic Energy AE22 passive - Neuman KH310 Pro Tools 12-2018 - Apple Mac Pro 5.1 - Mac OS 10.13 - EGO-SYS WaveTerminal U2A Pro Tools 12.6 - Apple Macbook Pro 2015 - Mac OS 10.11 - RME Fireface 802 Last edited by mups; 12-30-2022 at 01:53 PM. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools Clock vs. Interface Clocks
Quote:
So think of it as the sample rate running at the same speed when using multiple digital devices, like additional A/D/A converters. Within the studio. If you are just using a single interface, then you should run it off the internal. There have been tests that have shown the noise/jitter is worse even using a "high end Master Clock". If you plan to run the Apollo with a Ferrofish for example, you could even run the WC out to it and still be fine. However, when you get into daisy chaining, I think that is when a master clock is going to be something to consider if you are running multiple external digital gear. Not ever device is going to be superior in its output, at least they weren't 20 years ago. I would say you could daisy chain a few devices, but I would prefer a T splitter off the first device to DC. Single interface, not necessary. Multiple devices after say 3, it would benefit you.
__________________
Mac Pro 5,1. 3.46 12 core, 128 gigs ram, 580 GPU flashed Apple EMI, 3 monitors PT Ult 2023.6, OSX 10.14.6, 3 card PCI-e expansion with 3.2 USB Sonnet card. OCTO 8 card, Apollo 8 Quad, UAD quad satellite FW. Almost every plugin |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools Clock vs. Interface Clocks
In future please start a separate thread for your question. Spamming onto the end of other's threads is considered fairly impolite.
Quote:
But if you connect the S/PDIF TOSLINK output on the Amek DMCL to the computer's S/PDIF input you just set the computer S/PDIF In to clock from that S/PDIF input. And while clocking does not make as much difference as companies want to hype, it's still a good idea to clock computer internal interfaces off remote clock sources like the Amek DMCL. It's just typically a lot nicer electrical and thermal environment to run a clock in than a computer. But then going further and running an external Word Clock into the Amek DMCL is likely to 1. make no audible difference. 2. actually increase clock phase noise (even if you can't hear it). 3. confirm you as a marketing victim of clock box selling vendors. Last edited by Darryl Ramm; 12-30-2022 at 08:24 PM. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools Clock vs. Interface Clocks
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
For what it's worth, a side note about WC : a long time ago back when we were using stock 192's, I bough an Antelope OCX and hooked it up while my partner was on tour. When he came back, unaware of the gear change he opened a recent session and rapidly asked me what magic I had done to the mix, as it seemed clearer, with more depth, etc... But I hadn't touched it !
__________________
Pro Tools 10 HD3 - Apple Mac Pro 1.1 - Mac OS 10.9 - Digidesign 192 Black Lion mod - Apogee AD-8000 + AMBUS HD
Euphonix MC Mix - Audient Centro - APS Coax - Avantone Mixcube - Acoustic Energy AE22 passive - Neuman KH310 Pro Tools 12-2018 - Apple Mac Pro 5.1 - Mac OS 10.13 - EGO-SYS WaveTerminal U2A Pro Tools 12.6 - Apple Macbook Pro 2015 - Mac OS 10.11 - RME Fireface 802 |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Pro Tools Clock vs. Interface Clocks
Clock is not irrelevant, but as said modern interfaces are equipped with so damn good clocking to begin with, external clock is useless if you only need to clock few devices together.
Rewind two decades and things were different. For example DigiDesign 002R @96k sounds almost as good as DigiDesign 96 @48k and DigiDesign 192 clocked with a superior external clock unveils the sound and makes you think you are monitoring via much more expensive unit. Also already mentioned, but this Apogee Symphony II of mine has so good clock there is absolutely no need for a better one. THE only reason for external clock these days is easier clock distribution, but even then it does not necessarily mean clocking is better. And with Loop Sync even clock distribution became a moot point as the clocking loop keeps the interfaces together and each box has wordclock output for some 3rd party box which needs clocking.
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pro tools 12 with M-Audio 8 Interface Ext Clock | boing1999 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 0 | 10-30-2016 09:09 AM |
Help with choosing a new interface- What is a word clock and what does it do? | rockguitarist1255 | Tips & Tricks | 5 | 09-06-2013 10:06 AM |
Midi Beat Clocks pro tools 7.3.1 | imagoatretard | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 1 | 12-12-2007 11:00 AM |
Digi, now my legay interface does not clock with .. | Alécio Costa | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 5 | 08-30-2007 04:03 PM |
192 interface upgrade? EXT clock unstable? | rtcstudio | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 15 | 02-11-2006 07:51 AM |