|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
PC audio & midi: better together or separate?
I'm a Mac/PT TDM user about to build a PC rig to run GigaStudio and Acid. I'll be feeding the PC MTC from the Pro Tools/Mac rig, then recording the Giga-Acid outputs back into the Pro Tools/Mac rig.
Regarding the PC setup - I've heard conflicting reports as to whether it's better to have audio and midi integrated on the same soundcard or whether it's better to keep audio and midi separate on different cards or interfaces. Each camp claims it's method offers tighter sync and less latency. Being a PC/Wintel newbie I was hoping someone here might have some thoughts on the subject. Anyone??? Thanks in advance, Maxx |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Separate drive for audio/pro tools | Chrystal | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 12 | 02-26-2009 06:00 PM |
Specs for a separate audio drive | johnmahler | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 0 | 09-03-2007 11:24 AM |
Separate drive or partition for audio? | bytemonster | Storage Subsystems | 3 | 10-07-2002 08:48 PM |
MIDI window separate from audio | Compression Records | MIDI | 85 | 08-24-2002 02:39 AM |
PC audio & midi: better together or separate? | maxx | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 0 | 08-21-2001 03:13 AM |