Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > Pro Tools 10

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-05-2012, 09:24 PM
gluck777 gluck777 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: nc
Posts: 5
Default Thinking of trying protools 10... questions

My current studio setup is a 32 ch mixer and Cubase 6.I have never used pro tools and would consider buying it.I Tried the pt10 demo...but from what i am hearing and reading concerning the input monitoring issue.I would not be able to input monitor correctly thru my console without having the latency issues...Are there any versions of pro tools that work and monitor well with a console, windows 7, lynx converters?

Thanks in Advance

P.S.I dont really hear a major difference in daws.I think pro tools 10 is good sounding software.IMO...AT THIS TIME.. 2012... any 32 bit poor monitoring DAW is not superior to everything else.I see alot of industry standard fan boy quotes going on here...BUT a realistic industry standard DAW should sound good,monitor well and perform just as well with other interfaces....I Tried the demo and was seriously about to buy it... BUT..I discovered this monitoring problem. If the only way to get this feature is pay 1500-3k whatever more for a toolkit or hd...just for a button that nearly every other daw besides Pro Tools has...I won't buy it...I'm Not Bashing really because I would buy it if they fixed this and offered 64 bit version.I guess avid can decide...if they want to be industry standard or substandard...its been this way since pt9 right?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-06-2012, 04:09 AM
musicman691 musicman691 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: The Sopranos State (NJ)
Posts: 19,136
Default Re: Thinking of trying protools 10... questions

There's this: http://www.tritonedigital.com/index....hk=1&Itemid=20

which does what you want. However if you don't want to go that route with PT then there's always alternative daws. Seeing as how you're on a Windoze machine I'd suggest you take a look at Sonar X1. I have an ancient Winbox that runs the older Sonar 8.3.1 and does pretty much everything you want. Reason I didn't go for the newer version? I'd need a new computer and I'm not buying another Winbox. Macs for me now and Sonar doesn't run native on a Mac.

Sonar - number of tracks only limited by your computer's power, works with pretty much interface you want, no latency compensation limits issues (limits that PT has), and is 64 bit and has been for years. And I think it's cheaper than PT.
__________________
Jack
See profile for system details
iMac dead & retired as of 11/4/17

QAPLA!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-06-2012, 05:49 AM
CME CME is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ardmore OK
Posts: 3,207
Default

And what part are you wanting to be 64-bit? Yes the pro tools app is 32-bit and can only address 4GB of ram. So if you use VI's I understand the complaint.

However you mention using an outboard mixer, so I'm guessing you're more of an audio only guy. And since version 9 pro tools has had a 64-bit float mix engine. And pro tools 10 can now use 32-bit float files and have 32-bit float pathways. Which is equal to any other DAW out there.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Dell T5810. Harrison Mixbus 32C. Haven't used PT since 2015 and never been happier.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-06-2012, 11:53 AM
gluck777 gluck777 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: nc
Posts: 5
Default Re: Thinking of trying protools 10... questions

Yeah my 64 bit complaint was memory access related.I am serious I nearly pulled the trigger on pt10.If I'm reading all the complaints threads correctly, Even if i had pt10, a control 24, and my lynx converters, no avid interfaces. I could monitor with lowish latency, but not equal the zero latency and tape style monitoring required of a pro recording environment...Again not bashing but seriously disappointed...I know how to export wav files so transfer from any daw is really not an issue for me...I was expecting the "industry standard" to do most everything the 500 competition will.It REALLY surprises me that it will not..Does mutetone on a mac(don't see a mutone for pc) give the same result as zero latency tape style monitoring??

P.S.Nearly Every DAW in existance already has these features...CUBASE 6 IS BOTH 64 Bit memory access and Direct monitoring tape style.. I'm Interested in pro tools and still would be, but ONLY IF I COULD USE IT WITH ZERO LATENCY W rec console lynx ect

I'm running I7 16g w7 Cubase 6(64 bit)@64 buffer

Last edited by gluck777; 07-06-2012 at 11:55 AM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-06-2012, 12:05 PM
TOM@METRO's Avatar
TOM@METRO TOM@METRO is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 17,626
Default Re: Thinking of trying protools 10... questions

If you are truly looking for a "full on pro DAW", I would suggest HD TDM, or HDX. These will offer "pro" latency specs. And full compatibility with world-class studios.
__________________
~ tom thomas

Formerly hobotom

Pro Tools Ultimate 2024 HDX Hybrid
HD Omni and 192 I/Os
Windows 10
Intel Hexcore i7
All Samsung Pro SSDs
Ampex MM1200 2" 24 trk tape
Outboard: UREI, Eventide, Lexicon, Yamaha, TC Electronics, Orban, ART, EchoAudio, Dolby, Hughes, API, Neve, Audio Arts, BBE, Aphex, Berringer, MOTU, dbx, Allison, etc.
Plug-ins: Too many to talk about.

www.metrostudios.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-06-2012, 12:13 PM
jasonthurley's Avatar
jasonthurley jasonthurley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New York NY
Posts: 1,451
Default Re: Thinking of trying protools 10... questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOM@METRO View Post
If you are truly looking for a "full on pro DAW", I would suggest HD TDM, or HDX. These will offer "pro" latency specs. And full compatibility with world-class studios.
+1

Also your refer to Zero Latency recording... but that does not allow you to use any plugins while recording... like a nice verb for the vocalist to hear some room when recording... to do this.. even in Cubase, you have to turn off low latency monitoring or the effect is delayed behind the "low latency" recording (dry) signal....

The ONLY way to be able to do something like this in near Zero latency is to have external farm rendering... Ex is a TDM, HDX or even Native setup (these cards do the rendering of data externally from your CPU)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-06-2012, 12:19 PM
spenner spenner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow
Posts: 1,202
Default Re: Thinking of trying protools 10... questions

What Tom said.

And contrary to the first post, PT Native is not industry standard. That tagline refers to pro audio/post facilities using PT HD. From a Native standpoint, as you are displaying with the lack of input monitoring rant, there is absolutely no technical/feature reason to leave Cubase 6 for PT10. It comes down to personal workflow preference of what you want to use.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-06-2012, 12:33 PM
jasonthurley's Avatar
jasonthurley jasonthurley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New York NY
Posts: 1,451
Default Re: Thinking of trying protools 10... questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by spenner View Post
What Tom said.

PT Native is not industry standard. That tagline refers to pro audio/post facilities using PT HD. From a Native standpoint, as you are displaying with the lack of input monitoring rant, there is absolutely no technical/feature reason to leave Cubase 6 for PT10.
PT Native is PT software (Industry Standard) with a card that does some of the things a true TDM/HDX system can do, and you dont need a native card to open a PT session on a different type system so I dont know where the "Native is not standard" is coming from or what the point of that statement is. It does offer some lower monitoring option (lower hardware buffer) while recording with plugins (like I said monitoring a vocal verb while recording the dry vocal signal so the singer gets to hear themselves with some verb or compression and or gates as plug-ins (not being recorded but inserted for listening) on the drums/percussion).... Native does offer lower latency times while tracking...

However TDM and HDX systems are really what you want... not sure if they even make a farm render card for Cubase or any other of the DAW's on the market.

The bottom line is If you cannot afford a true (Low Latency) Pro Tools rig, than maybe another DAW is better for you... Pro Tools have more user options and configuration options than any other DAW out there and they keep adding more/new features.

The 32 bit mode is irrelevant unless your using a lot of RTAS/VST/VI and in that case you aren't going to have low latency monitoring even at 64 bit. Sure when PT goes 64 bit you will be able to have more VI/RTAS/VST's running and probably be able to run them at a lower latency/buffer setting, but the power is in the farm rendering cards.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-06-2012, 12:59 PM
spenner spenner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow
Posts: 1,202
Default Re: Thinking of trying protools 10... questions

It is not about what PT Native can do but rather about what pro facilities use. I have not once seen PT Native as the main rig in any pro facility I've used in the last 12 years. PT Native is a great DAW that I use daily... There are also other awesome DAWs like Cubase 6. However, the tagline "industry standard" refers to PT HD, plain and simple.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-06-2012, 01:16 PM
gluck777 gluck777 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: nc
Posts: 5
Default Re: Thinking of trying protools 10... questions

Man I Have No problem Staying with Cubase ...Only asking VERY LEGIT QUESTIONS and also COMPLAINTS...My purpose for posting was to find out if there was any recent native version of pro tools that will do what..I can currently do with NO latencey, With almost EVERY other DAW IN 2012... I ABSOLUTLEY do not care who may think I'm a professional or not based on the software i choose...cornered market 1988 days are gone... No DAW will give u an ear.What u can hear and learn more every day will make u a pro way faster than the time u spend crowing about Gear...So lets kill the gear snob bs OK


Another Reason I was considering the switch was Avid being a U.S. based company

I Hope if they fix these simple issues instead of trying to sell standard features as upgrades.Its really not 1990 anymore guys
A friend has won multiple grammys using freakin da-38s... please stop the pt industry standard jokefest... again not the purpose of my post

Last edited by gluck777; 07-06-2012 at 01:21 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Seriously thinking of getting 11rack for my studio, but I have a few questions first. Lachrae Eleven Rack 14 11-13-2013 08:48 AM
Thinking of moving to Pro Tools. I have Questions.. TheEdster75 Windows 5 04-17-2012 10:06 PM
thinking of upgrading to TDM ...a few questions shynomi Pro Tools TDM Systems (Win) 4 12-06-2004 07:51 AM
Thinking of buying a Mac/PT 002...some questions for you emmanuelle2 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 7 01-28-2003 10:37 PM
Thinking about an Mbox, couple of questions first... trackfive 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 1 03-12-2002 08:42 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:58 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com