Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Software > Tips & Tricks
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-02-2007, 08:44 AM
gar_lei gar_lei is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 49
Default Compressing the recording signal???

Hello

I want to kow if there is a way to compress the recording signal with plugins just like what the external compressors does?
Cause I have a focusrite preamp that doesn't have inserts, so I wanna see if I could use some plugins to compress the signal before it gets record.

The purpose of the compression is to avoid clipping.

Thanks in advance!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-02-2007, 12:00 PM
jfitz jfitz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 156
Default Re: Compressing the recording signal???

create an aux, and an audio track.

Set the AUX's input to that of the incoming signal from the focusrite
Set the AUX's output to a bus.

Set the AUDIO TRACK'S input to the aforementioned bus
record arm audio track

Insert compressor on AUX track.
(make sure the aux volume is at unity (alt+click on the fader))
__________________
Joe Fitz
Producer / Engineer
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-02-2007, 12:17 PM
mindnoise mindnoise is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany and Tokyo
Posts: 3,094
Default Re: Compressing the recording signal???

Hi,

Sorry, but the question of gar_lei was how to avoid clipping of an analog input signal.
But the method described above is totally unsuitable to avoid that!

The ONLY other way to avoid signal clipping is using a hardware compressor/limiter.
But itīs easy to screw up with a compressor in the recording chain, if youīre not
sure how it will work with the rest of the mix later on.

Why does this does NOT work with plug-ins?
Because the plug-in works on the digitized signal, not the analog input Signal.
What do you think you see when the level meter in ProTools moves?

Once the signal is IN the computer is digitized and therefor no
possibility exits to avoid clipping of an analogue input within the digital domain.

Besides one:
with 24bit recording it si not necessary to record to totally hot levels.
conservative metering with a 1/2 to 3/4 volume level is totally OK!

Itīs also the most common and best way to record the signal as direct as you can.
you can add compression later in your mix.
Most of the times you screw your recordings when using a compressor in the recording chain
with the utmost care.

And finally: you DONīT have to compress all and everything.

...hope this is of some help.

regs
__________________
last: PT11.3.1
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-02-2007, 12:28 PM
gar_lei gar_lei is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 49
Default Re: Compressing the recording signal???

Thank you very much for the replies!

the reason why I wanted some compression, is simply to compress whenever there is a sudden loud part.
So I guess if I really want one, I would have to get a hardware compressor...

By the way, you were saying that there's something special that we have to deal with when we record with compression.
Could you explain that a bit please?


Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-02-2007, 10:13 PM
jfitz jfitz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 156
Default Re: Compressing the recording signal???

He's saying not to overcompress the incoming signal. just use it lightly as a safety net, to avoid clipping.

Also, he's right about my method being useless for avoiding digital clipping, but I'm sure you could find other uses for it.

Check ebay for hardware compressors (I use a dbx 160, that works pretty well, for now), and just place it directly in your signal path
focusrite > Compressor > Interface
__________________
Joe Fitz
Producer / Engineer
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-03-2007, 06:13 AM
gar_lei gar_lei is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 49
Default Re: Compressing the recording signal???

Thanks a lot!

I was looking @ the dbx 160 as well.
I think I might pick up one of those.

THANKS!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-03-2007, 06:16 AM
mindnoise mindnoise is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany and Tokyo
Posts: 3,094
Default Re: Compressing the recording signal???

Hi everybody,

Quote:
Also, he's right about my method being useless for avoiding digital clipping, but I'm sure you could find other uses for it.
Yes, that Bus/AUX thing is the one of the reasons DAW are so great, plenty of creative potential here!


Quote:
By the way, you were saying that there's something special that we have to deal with when we record with compression.
Could you explain that a bit please?
I guess that goes in my direction so:

when using compressors you must be aware, that you not only change the dynamics of a recording
but also the rhythmical feel of it, due to the attack/release settings.

a phrase about comps that goes around here is "to treat a compressor like a loaded gun - carefully, donīt point until you know you hit the target", that of course does not apply this way to sound design.

In the beginnings a "Compressor" was a studio JOB! An Engineer riding the volume controls to avoid
distortion and to take care of the overal volume balance. Usually with classical recordings
he had the notations infront of him and knew in advance when the loud or quiet parts were coming
and adjust the volume accordingly.

The point of this is, that you may have to try perhaps LOTS of compressor settings until you achieve
the optimum recording, to find these settings requires time and usually only very few settings
can be applied to one specific recording, while the others will most likely deteriorate the recording compared to an unprocessed recording.
And if you record some oneīs playing or singing he/she might get tired of repeating the same thing over and over again until you found the correct settings.

So itīs better to just record with conservative levels and apply the treating later on when necessary.

So you still might want to use a brickwall limiter which is way better than record clipping.
the DBX stuff seems to be fine to start with. I have a TL Audio comp, but usually donīt use it
for controlling input signals.

This is not discourage you to do it, though. You can only learn in the process.

regs
__________________
last: PT11.3.1
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-03-2007, 08:56 AM
foxlemieux foxlemieux is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: savannah
Posts: 37
Default Re: Compressing the recording signal???

This was some advice given to me that has yet to fail. Especially if you are recording in 24bit, just turn the mic pre gain down a little lower than you normally would when recording something that could potentially have a loud transient. The noise floor is low enough with 24 bits that normalizing/gaining/compressing/etc after recording doesn't bring too much if any noise into the equation. It's a much cheaper solution as well. There's obviously a limit to how low/how much you can turn up the sound later, but with 24 bits you have way more wiggle room than you might realize. Note that this doesn't work well with 16bit recording. If you are going to buy some external hardware I'd say a limiter would be a better idea than a compressor if you are looking only to control peaking.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-05-2007, 09:04 AM
mcgirr mcgirr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 167
Default Re: Compressing the recording signal???

Ditto.
Limiting should occur on the input of the material. This is done to avoid clipping of the original signal.

Compression is almost exclusively for mix/ master stage.

Peak LIMITING is the solution you are looking for to avoid wasted takes.

Best wishes.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-05-2007, 10:39 AM
EGS's Avatar
EGS EGS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,701
Default Re: Compressing the recording signal???

Quote:
...So itīs better to just record with conservative levels and apply the treating later on when necessary...
I agree with this. If you print an inappropriate use of compression, then you have "painted yourself into a corner". If you insert a compressor plug on the record track, you can monitor the results immediatly without "printing" the compression. To me, this provides speed AND flexibility. My 2 cents.
__________________
Desktop build: PT 2020.5 / Win 11 / i9-11900K @ 5.1GHz / 64GB / 4TB NVMe PCIe 4 / Gigabyte Z590 Vision D / PreSonus 2626
Laptop: PT 2020.5 / Win 11 / i5-12500H / 16GB / 1TB NVMe / Lenovo IdeaPad 5i Pro / U-PHORIA UMC1820
Ancient/Legacy (still works!): PT 5 & 6 / OS9 & OSX / Mac G4 / DIGI 001
Click for audio/video demo
Click for resume
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Recording a Dry Signal Becharax Eleven Rack 18 01-12-2014 12:49 PM
Compressing the input signal [email protected] Pro Tools 9 7 12-16-2012 08:36 AM
Eqing and Compressing while recording in front of the interface? barters81 The Drum Room 8 04-18-2010 10:17 PM
compressing a signal? sheeptuf 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 2 01-19-2007 12:25 PM
Outboard compressing vs. PTLE compressing?????? BigAL603 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 14 04-15-2005 08:30 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:45 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com